Single net partner

The web page that you're trying to access requires you to log in. Please log in above with your AMOS user ID and password. You will be automatically redirected back ... Please login with your Franklin Pierce credentials. Username: Password: Single Net Lease. Single net leases are the least common type of net lease. In a single net lease, the tenant is responsible for paying all or a portion of the property taxes on the property in addition to the pre-established rental rate. While this financial responsibility shifts from the landlord to the tenant, most landlords still prefer the ... My Francis Single Sign-On: Please login with your JICS credentials. ex. abc001 . Username: Password: You have reached this page because you are trying to access one of the following software applications: Hoonuit (Atomic Learning), Campus Labs, Canvas, Cognos, Engage, Google, HigherOne Cashnet, NetPartner, Pyramid Health. Online Dating at Match.com. Every year, hundreds of thousands of people find love on Match.com. Match.com pioneered the Internet dating industry, launching in 1995 and today serves millions of singles in 24 countries.Match.com continues to redefine the way single men and single women meet, flirt, date and fall in love, proving time and again that you can make love happen through online dating ... Net Partner is an auxiliary program that creates a Web portal for your students to see information and interact with PowerFAIDS. Net Partner allows students to log onto a password-protected page to access their financial aid information online anytime and from any computer. Net Partner is economical and can be implemented quickly and easily. If you’re a single dad or mom, this low-pressure atmosphere may be all right at first, but it’s not the most effective way to find a new partner and build a serious relationship. For that, you’re better off choosing a more mature dating ground where a single person much invest in the dating process in order to send messages online. Loading Net Partner ... A private online dating community for people seeking ABF/ANR lifestyles. Our main goal is to help single Western men to find their soul mate in Ukraine. We provide the Dating Service both to single Western men and Single Ukraine Women, who would like to find a partner for having a romance or a serious relationship, and possibly building a strong family based on love, respect and mutual understanding.

Solo Polyamory

2014.06.19 23:54 aggiesez Solo Polyamory

Practicing polyamory with a strong focus on personal autonomy and limited life entanglement. Solo poly people are open to honest, nonexclusive relationships (from strictly casual to deep and long lasting), but generally we do not live with a partner, share finances, or have other common benchmarks of "primary-style" relationships.
[link]


2013.08.17 08:36 Veeir LobosJr

The Dark Souls Twitch streamer LobosJR.
[link]


2014.01.07 20:22 blogad4 Steam Giveaways

Feeling generous? Have an unclaimed Steam key? Want to reap that glorious karma from gluttonous gamers? steam_giveaway is the place for you! Here, users (givers) announce giveaways that other users (takers) can enter in to win Steam game codes.
[link]


2020.09.21 22:15 kayakero TEXT CHEMISTRY REDDIT: REVIEW & DISCOUNT

TEXT CHEMISTRY REDDIT: REVIEW & DISCOUNT
You kind frantically, pouring out your heart and soul into a text. Filled with emotion and excitement, you take a deep breath and hit “Send.” Several lengthy moments pass, it feels like a lifetime and then, “Buzz…. buzzzzz…!!” He finally replied!
You swipe shortly and open the response and see…, “K.” Your heart drops into your belly as you are hit with a startling realization. He is no longer into you.
If you have ever experienced a scene like this, then right here is something you want to hear. A new ground-breaking program referred to as “Text Chemistry by Amy North Review” is designed to prevent you from enduring this variety of heartache ever again.
Armed with this secret weapon, you can enter the world of relationships with an inevitable outcome. You will attract the man of your goals and convince him that you are his one and only.
Click here to access Text Chemistry
https://preview.redd.it/cjub7fzi4ko51.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=555c1db3aaacbf7d7012fe50f9d4079428a8bc92

Text Chemistry Reddit - What Is Text Chemistry?

Created and developed via a successful relationship counselor and author, Text Chemistry is the courting answer you’ve been longing for. In our digital age, texting and messaging makes up a massive portion of how we speak with potential love interests.
You can also assume that this capability it is harder to clutch and keep a man’s attention. Not so with this tried and real guide to hooking any man you desire. These secrets and techniques unlock the potential to harness the mind of your man and fill it with you.
By making use of a few simple techniques, you’ll have him head-over-heels obsessed. Once below your spell, he won’t be able to assist but to assume of you. Thoughts and images of you will infiltrate his focus in every waking moment.
Fantasies of you will plague his dreams, night time after night. As if under the impact of a psychological cocktail, you’ll have him drunk on the very idea of you.
Text Chemistry has helped thousands of ladies to land the catch of their dreams. The excellent part is that you don’t want to be a super-model, or bursting with charisma, in order for this method to work for you. Thick or thin, tall or short, stunning or plain. With these tools in your arsenal, all else ceases to matter.
GET Text Chemistry HERE!!!
Who Is Amy North?
As a professional professional counselor and famend author, Amy North has developed a unique skillset. Using her aptitude in each of these areas, she extensively studied the science at the back of relationships.
Her focus has been on dating, and assisting people discover fulfillment and happiness in their partner. A proper expert in her field, Amy has turn out to be known international for her role in assisting others form healthful relationships.
True to her nature, she took all of her study and journey and boiled it down. The result is the Text Chemistry course. This effective collection combines years of expert background with a ardour for relationships.
The results are astounding, and her work speaks for itself. Amy’s character and expertise illuminates each sentence, reflecting a belief that any lady can experience the relationship of a lifetime.
What Will You Learn From Text Chemistry Pdf?
Found inside the pages of Text Chemistry are a number of hidden gems. It is a whole guide to redefining your relationships at any stage you can imagine. You will research the basics of how to teach guys to text you lower back swiftly and consistently.
Furthermore, you’ll be taught a texting strategy that will draw him in and hold his attention. This will preserve his mind on you, and you alone, successfully making you a one-woman show taking part in on repeat.
Have you lost your ex and choose him back? Send the specially developed “Satellite Text” to fill him with concern and regret. In no time, he will be begging for another threat with you! By using preexisting “hard-wired” stipulations of a man’s brain, you’ll take back manipulate and keep him trying more.
https://preview.redd.it/grnk99as4ko51.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6d8de2e2d4431ee6ead75a08df10bec14a0e9b9
Visit official website here
What about the long-term relationship that has fallen off the tracks? Try the “Game On” and “Super Nova” approaches to re-ignite the flames. Make your man feel, as soon as again, the same ardour that helped your relationship to blossom in the first place.
Another insight of the software is how to make him miss you and recapture his each thought. This can be especially beneficial during an prolonged period of time apart. By the time you are in every other’s arms again, he won’t be in a position to keep his fingers off of you! Time spent apart will be an extension of playful foreplay that sends his wish for you off the charts.
For the ultimate game-changer, examine how to fill his mind with subliminal recommendations for that long sought-after diamond ring. Drop refined hints that will make him choose to settle down and family-up in a heartbeat!
Text Chemistry Pros and Cons
Pros
  • The program is very convenient to follow. Special attention has been given to make this path short, sweet, and to the point. All books and videos are extremely good organized and genuinely convey the vital messages.
  • Bonuses! For a limited time, the full software is accompanied by three FREE bonuses. Phone Game, Why Men Leave, and Quality Men on Tinder are commonly sold one at a time for $29.99 each. However, for those fortunate enough to order soon, they are blanketed with the entire application for less than $50!
  • You have nothing to lose! Amy North is so positive these methods will work, that she is inclined to refund you if they don’t. Simply send an electronic mail within 60 days of your buy and receive a full refund, no questions asked!
  • It covers the entire relationship spectrum, no matter what your contemporary situation or relationship status. Text Chemistry has the equipment you need to rejuvenate your love lifestyles and produce real consequences for any woman.
  • Quick and easy ordering. In a be counted of “clicks,” you will have access to the whole program. Everything you need in the palm of your hand, literally!
Cons
  • No quantity of specialized texting can substitute a one-on-one dialogue. These are the best equipment to jumpstart your relationship, so don’t expect it to stand in for face-to-face interactions
  • It can be perceived as “toying” with a man’s emotions, so it is essential to wield this knowledge carefully. Any superb effects of the software may be undone if your love hobby feels he has been “played.”
  • Online purchase only. Those barring access to the net are out of luck.

Text Chemistry Reddit: Does Text Chemistry Work?

Innumerable reviews and testimonials swear through the results of the Text Chemistry system. Real women, simply like you, are benefiting from the guide Amy has furnished time and time again. Every. Single. Day.
This universal strategy has united women from all backgrounds and existence with one common result. Happier and extra fulfilling relationships with their men. No depend what your story, or what struggle you are facing, this information has the ability to trade your life. Literally forever.
The man that you have been waiting for may want to be just round the corner. Don’t let him get in his own way, robbing you each of the happiness you are meant to experience. You can use this application to guide your man into a meaningful, dedicated relationship that will bring pleasure for years to come.
Get Text Chemistry HERE!!!

Conclusion

If you’re fed up with a cycle of “flare-up” romances, here one day and long past the next, don’t settle! Start your journey towards your very own “happily ever after” proper now!
With this program as your lantern, mild up the darkness that surrounds so many relationships. Cut through all the pain, heartache, and pitfalls that so many girls have endured.
Don’t allow your self to continue to observe the same detrimental patterns guy after guy. Instead, believe the intuition of Amy and begin living like the queen that you are. You recognize that you deserve this, and soon adequate he will know it too!
GET Text Chemistry HERE!!!
-----------------------
Disclosure: if you purchase Text Chemistry I may receive a compensation. This has NO extra cost to you.
submitted by kayakero to reviewsforyou [link] [comments]


2020.09.21 21:21 dadoonan Green Party Message for International Day of Peace: Support UN Call for Global Ceasefire, Repeal Authorization for Use of Military Force Act


https://preview.redd.it/9ldpti47xjo51.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ab3d50ff4e901345c5333853361e9b823e5757ef
The Green Party observes the 39th anniversary of the United Nations International Day of Peace on September 21 by affirming support for the UN General Assembly Resolution 36/37 to “commit to peace above all difference.” The 1981 Resolution established the International Day of Peace with unanimous support.
Green Party leaders condemn the perpetual state of war launched, with bitter irony, on the 19th anniversary of the Day of Peace Resolution with the passage of the post-9/11 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). Green Leaders also emphasized the party’s demand for the repeal of the AUMF, which has even greater urgency with the global crises of COVID-19 and climate disruption.
Green Party of the United States www.gp.org
For Immediate Release: Monday, September 21, 2020
Contact: Michael O’Neil, Communications Manager, [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]), 202-804-2758 Holly Hart, Co-chair, Media Committee, [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]), 202-804-2758 Craig Seeman, Co-chair, Media Committee, [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]), 202-804-2758
Howie Hawkins, Green Party Presidential Nominee:
“It is shameful that in May the US was the sole UN Security Council veto of the proposed global ceasefire in order to cooperate to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a far greater threat to Americans than any force the US is fighting in its endless wars. The US ruling class would rather make war than heal the sick. So the US leads the world in deaths from COVID-19 at home and deaths in its foreign wars abroad. Those are terrible facts to recognize on the UN’s International Day of Peace."
Angela Walker, Green Party Nominee for Vice-President:
"If the United States is to change its status in the world from one of aggression and domination to one of peace and cooperation, we must repeal the Authorization for Use of Force Act."
Madelyn Hoffman, Green Party Candidate for US Senate (NJ), and Co-Chair of the Green Party’s Peace Action Committee (GPAX):
“The ramifications of war and preparation for war echo in every corner of human society in our country and abroad with devastating effects. It is time to end the horrible atrocities and unacceptable costs inflicted on humanity by the perpetuation of endless war.”
Lisa Savage, Green Party Candidate US Senate (ME):
“Our nation has become a military empire exporting violence and weaponry around the world while imposing austerity at home to pay for it. I call for an immediate end to US wars of aggression, occupations, and military bases in other people's countries. Let's bring the war dollars home and take care of our own urgent needs during this pandemic: Medicare for All universal single-payer improved and expanded health care, and a demilitarized Green New Deal to address the climate emergency that is our biggest security threat. As global citizens, let's not fight each other for resources but instead cooperate with one another to develop a response to the immediate threat of the COVID-19 virus.”
This year’s Peace Day theme is “Shaping Peace Together,” with the emphasis on working together globally to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this year, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called for an immediate global ceasefire, saying, “End the sickness of war and fight the disease that is ravaging our world. . . That is what our human family needs . . .” His call for “solidarity across borders” is consistent with the Green Party’s belief that peace, environmental responsibility and health are intimately connected. Anyone who now denies we are one interdependent human species across borders on mother earth is not in tune to the unprecedented moment we share today.
According to the GPAX World Peace Action platform: “Despite the United Nations call for a global ceasefire during the Covid-19 world-wide pandemic, our government has instead deployed 20,000 troops to Europe to encircle Russia, and has sent warships to threaten Venezuela, Iran, and China. … Further, our country’s interventions in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East have left us mired in endless wars that have weakened our country’s economic vitality and decreased opportunities for our children.”
The Green Party’s Peace Action Committee has issued a Peace Pledge which they encourage all candidates for state and local office to sign.
“We have the opportunity while being forced to adapt to a pandemic to reflect on the very real opportunities to end our unsustainable way of life,” said Susan Lamont of the Green Party of California. “Let’s use this opportunity to rethink the ways in which we interact as people and as nations.” She added that the Green party of California platform “advocates a fundamental change in the way we socialize our citizens, structure our institutions, and relate to the planet and its people.” On this 2020 International Day of Peace, we remind people loudly and clearly that “peace is not just the absence of violence, it is a willingness to resolve conflict in a constructive manner with a spirit of good will and respect.” http://www.cagreens.org/platform/peace-non-violence

For more information
UN General Assembly Resolution 36/37, General Assembly - Thirty-sixth Session, UN.org, 1981
170 signatories endorse UN ceasefire appeal during COVID crisis UN News, UN News, June 24, 2020
Secretary-General’s Appeal for Global Ceasefire, UN.org, March 23, 2020
Secretary-General reiterates Appeal for Global Ceasefire, Warns ‘Worst Is Yet to Come’ as COVID-19 Threatens Conflict Zones, UN.org, April 3, 2020
H.R. 2829 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Clarification Act, congress.org, May 17, 2019
Green Party Platform: Foreign Policy - Peace and Disarmament
Green Party Peace Action Committee Peace Pledge
The Green Party’s World Peace Platform
Green Party of the United States www.gp.org 202-319-7191
Newsroom Twitter: @GreenPartyUS Green Party Platform Green New Deal Green candidate database and campaign information Facebook page YouTube Green Pages: The official publication of record of the Green Party of the United States Green Papers
submitted by dadoonan to GreenParty [link] [comments]


2020.09.21 20:06 OatmealGaruma Over correcting beginners might do more harm than good.

I'm working on research for my master's thesis (trying to do a study on judo tangentially related to this topic) but I came across a study that confirms something I've anecdotally observed and that I wanted to share here. You can read the study for yourself if you'd like (see below), but basically, they compared different groups of beginners trying to learn o soto gari. One group received feedback on their performance every time, one group received feedback when their throw would have scored a yuko or less, and one group received feedback when their throw would have scored a wazari or less.
To summarize the findings of the study: the more feedback a group received, the more difficulty they appeared to have learning the technique. Particularly at retention (a test done some time after most of the practice is completed, in this case 24 hours after the last practice.) The (proposed) reasons? When you receive too much feedback on a skill you don't yet understand you 1. Become overwhelmed with the amount of information you're being given, and can't apply it, and 2. Don't develop your own internal error recognition and correction mechanisms. You don't learn to identify a good or bad throw on your own, and so struggle to self correct.
This might be something that is intuitively obvious to a lot of people, but I've seen my fair share of high ranks that get partnered with a new guy and then take a time out to lecture him on every single thing he could improve after every single attempt. It might be better to let people "get some reps in" before jumping in with the corrections. Help them out if they're way off, but if they've got something pretty good going, maybe leave them with their own thoughts for a minute.

Source: de Souza Lopes1ABCD, C., Ishii2D, T., & Vieira1AC, M. M. (2018). Effects of the bandwidth knowledge of performance in the acquisition of a judo motor skill.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marcio_Vieira7/publication/335490187_Effects_of_the_bandwidth_knowledge_of_performance_in_the_acquisition_of_a_judo_motor_skill/links/5d7d2f3ca6fdcc2f0f6fb2aa/Effects-of-the-bandwidth-knowledge-of-performance-in-the-acquisition-of-a-judo-motor-skill.pdf
Just a heads up the English isn't incredible here, so it can be a little difficult to parse what they're saying at times. Also, it seems to me that there's an error with Figure 2, it seems to me that the display for the NBG and the WBG is swapped, based on what the text is saying.
submitted by OatmealGaruma to judo [link] [comments]


2020.09.21 15:26 Kitchencabinet121 Determining a Kitchen Remodeling Budget

It is very essential to establish a budget for any residence enhancement task, and kitchen makeover is no exception.
A word of caution: I spent numerous hours investigating kitchen remodeling cost as well as budgeting on the net to collect data for this short article. I encountered a pair sites that provided square footage prices for kitchen improvement. Although I commiserate with their effort to find a simple method to find out redesigning prices, this kind of recommendations is not based actually. Renovation jobs in general are so specific to the conditions of the building as well as tastes of the homeowner that no square video rates will ever be sensible. I likewise ran into lots of websites that did not give you any actual information concerning establishing a spending plan yet generally analyzed Hanley Wood's Remodeling Cost vs. Value record which is published every year. You are far better off going to the Cost vs. Value record online as well as reviewing the outcomes on your own.
Like anything else in this globe a kitchen remodel is mosting likely to cost more than you assumed it would certainly and the skies is the limit on what it can set you back depending on your tastes. There are multiple elements that go into figuring out a renovating budget plan.
There are numerous places on-line you can go to help you establish a fundamental budget plan number to begin with. My individual suggestion is Remodeling Magazine's Cost vs. Value Report which is launched by region as well as major city each year. The actually wonderful aspect of this report is that it gives a summary of the "ordinary" task to make sure that you can determine if your kitchen remodel is going to drop over or listed below the benchmark. I additionally find their average pricing to be an accurate reflection of the prices for our business, so by recommending to clients prior to I even consult with them that they examine this record they are most likely to develop a practical spending plan we can work within to give them a wonderful kitchen.
Personalized Hutch constructed with Semi-Custom Cabinets
While Remodeling Magazine's record is extremely handy, it is still an extremely one size fits all method to developing a budget plan. Keep checking out if you would certainly such as to try to refine your numbers a little bit.
Venture out a pad and also paper and also take down a few notes about each element as you experience this listing:
Variable 1 Home Value- Consider not only what you assume your home is worth, however likewise the value of comparable homes in your neighborhood that currently have updates. My favorite website to inspect residence values is zillow.com, merely enter your address as well as you obtain an interactive map with house worths and also other information provided exactly on the map. Remember of which homes are of similar dimension to yours, have actually been purchased much more recently, however have a higher value, then peek in their windows to see what the house appears like. Ok, seriously, I was only joking. If you do not know them maybe it's time to meet the next-door neighbors and request for a quick tour.
Element 2 Wow! - This has every little thing to do with your goals and also motivations. Document each inspirational aspect which is necessary to you in a kitchen remodel. Here are some feasible examples: Kitchen is falling apart. You love to cook as well as the layout doesn't fit you. You enjoy to amuse and intend to open up the kitchen as an area to gather. You want a kitchen that wows your guests. You are preparing yourself to market your home and also the kitchen is a sticking point with purchasers ... Now that you have your list, assess which motivations are crucial as well as relist them in inspirational order. Imagining your budget beginning in "the center" bear in mind of which elements could move the budget up or down ... i.e. wanting to redesign to urge a sale may relocate the budget down, renovating to wow visitor might max it out ... and so on
. Variable 3 Did someone state AGA? - List any kind of "needs to riches" for a kitchen remodel to be worth it to you. Feasible examples: granite counters, an island with an added sink, a 2nd dish washer, a business quality gas range, and so on
. Factor 4 Longevity- Determine to the most effective of your capability the length of time you intend on having the home.
Aspect 5 Size Matters- Determine what percentage of your house your kitchen incorporates. A tasting of over 100 contemporary house floorplans of 1000 to 3000 square foot homes exposed the ordinary kitchen square video footage to be 7% of the home's square video. If your kitchen is larger or smaller sized than this standard you might require to increase or reduce your budget accordingly.
Variable 6 Layout- if you already understand you're mosting likely to desire the sink moved, an island sink included, an indoor wall relocated as well as an outside door added, then you require to add cash to your budget plan well beyond what a basic facelift would certainly set you back.
Difficult design: the ornamental column conceals an audio covered drainpipe pipeline
Aspect 7 Funding- Determine the maximum amount of money you could manage to invest. If you are funding your task you can determine what a loan provider will likely lend you. Lenders wish to see a financial obligation to income ratio( DTI) of.36 or less. Your DTI is developed by taking all your monthly financial debt obligations (charge card repayments, vehicle financings, home mortgage, and so on) as well as splitting by your month-to-month earnings. To identify your optimum safe regular monthly financial debt multiply.36 times your month-to-month earnings. Now deduct your existing month-to-month financial obligation from this number and you have a monthly budget plan maximum. Below's a link to a calculator that will do the mathematics for you: home mortgage calculator
Putting all of it Together
The key to determining your spending plan is locating the portion of your residence's worth you should make use of as a budget standard. While researching this article I stumbled upon recommendations to utilize portions ranging from 10% to 25% of residence worth. For a kitchen remodel of any kind of substance that includes brand-new flooring, devices, cabinets, sink/faucet, lights and bringing electrical up to code I find anything less than 15% to be a really uncertain number. I suppose on a million dollar residence 10% would be a practical budget plan, yet on a 200k house a 20k budget is marginal at ideal for a complete blown kitchen remodel.
If resale worth is essential to you it is wise to keept the price of your kitchen restoration job within 20% of the current value of your residence. Remaining within this range insures that a majority of the brand-new kitchen's cost is recovered in enhanced home worth promptly, as well as the remaining cost must be recouped within 5 years as your house appreciates.
Ok, let's run through an instance. Bear in mind, there is no exact formula right here. We are merely doing our best to be as educated as possible as well as make a sensible decision regarding just how much to spend on our kitchen remodel.
For our example allow's use my home. It's a 50's cape cod with a modest square video of 1500.
Element 1 value: Zillow offers me an approximated worth of $167,500, nevertheless, I notice zillow hasn't yet upgraded as well as accounted for the single family members houses which were just recently integrated in the area behind us with a starting rate of $270k. Zillow likewise has our square video footage noted at under 1200. Appears like the previous proprietor did a little remodeling without an authorization. I'm going to base my budget plan on a cost of 180k which is similar to other homes in your area that coincide dimension.
Element 2 Goals: My partner and I enjoy to captivate guests. To make a kitchen remodel beneficial for us we need to shed an interior wall surface to open up the kitchen as well as dining space to the living room. I'm mosting likely to add 1% to allocate this.
Variable 3 Must Haves: As a former chef 2 needs to haves for me are a new stove and an actually wonderful gas array(no natural gas service below), preferably a business range changed for residence usage (genuine business ranges don't have insulation around the oven, vital for residence safety and security). I'm mosting likely to include one more 1% to my spending plan to make sure there is enough money to get me my range and propane installment.
📷
Factor 4 Longevity: We intend to remain in our residence a minimum of 4 years. Generally of thumb it takes 5 years for many renovating to value and redeem all of its price. Given that we will likely be right here a minimum of 5 years I'm not mosting likely to penalize the budget, however since there is a great chance we'll relocate right around 5 years I'm not mosting likely to boost it like I would certainly if we were staying a lot longer.
Element 5 Size of Kitchen: Our kitchen has to do with 140SquareFeet(SF). That's over 9% of the SF of your house, 2% above standard. Certainly this kitchen is going to require some additional product as well as cabinets. I'm going to up the budget 1% for this, I hope it's enough.
Aspect 6 Layout: We are mosting likely to change the design of our kitchen quite extensively. We currently have a cooktop peninsula. The variety is going to go on a differnet wall and also the dishwasher will certainly transfer to the peninsula, though we could ditch the peninsula, relocate the fridge and include an island instead. Concerning the only point that will not move is the sink. I'm mosting likely to add an additional 1% to my budget plan, again hoping $1800 (1% of our 180k value) suffices to cover the electric and plumbing changes.
For my base I'm going to make use of 20%. As I discussed in the past, there are going to be people that will suggest with me on that particular, but going lower typically does not leave you with convenient spending plan numbers for full blown kitchen remodels. I'm adding 4% based on my elements detailed above. I adjusted my zillow.com estimated house value to 180k based on the equivalent square footage as well as value of other homes around me. This provides me a functioning spending plan of 24% x 180k= $43,200 When I compare this to the Cost Vs. Value report I see that in the Middle Atlantic Region a Major Kitchen Renovation is $59, 098. It looks like my spending plan could be bit low, specifically given that I truly would such as granite countertops and the Cost Vs. Value specs call for laminate tops. On the other hand my kitchen is dramatically smaller sized than their 200SF standard, so I believe I'll select my budget plan number and also see what my professional can do for me in that budget plan.
Cabinets and Remodeling Depot in Tampa – One of the competent Bathroom Remodeling,Kitchen Remodeling Firm,the cabinet store ,kitchen cabinet outlet ,Laminate Counter Tops Tampa FL,kitchen faucets with sprayer Tampa FL,bathroom shower faucets Valrico FL,engineered wood flooring cost Tampa FL,modern bathroom vanities firm in Tampa and Valrico FL area.
submitted by Kitchencabinet121 to u/Kitchencabinet121 [link] [comments]


2020.09.21 14:26 realmag777 WOOT - WooCommerce Products Tables

WOOT - WooCommerce Products Tables

WOOT – WooCommerce Products Tables
WooCommerce allows creating commercial websites that are high in quality and rich in functionality. Because it is so easy to operate and manage, it is the best platform for online store creation. It provides the most powerful functionality on the market, helping to sell physical or virtual products.

Silent dialogue with the customer

The store owner's initial task is to decide on the format of product presentation for users, and this task is solved using numerous WordPress themes. Placement of products and their features in the store is like a silent dialogue with the customer, showing its advantages and benefits. The better is the website visitor’s perception of the presented information, the more probability of product purchase and store profit.
Product tables are an undeniable advantage to the customer, allowing the most accessible and structured product presentation method. Product tables help the customer cover all the product characteristics at a glance, reducing the perception time to a minimum. The website visitor will not have to search through numerous website pages, which may cause him to forget why he came to the website in the first place, losing his focus of perception from his set goal or intended purpose of the store.

Solution

WOOT - WooCommerce Products Tables easily keep the customer’s attention without tiresome unnecessary actions. All the products and filters are on the same page, and with the AJAX technology, the customer can find what he is looking for instantly. The customer can compare the found products on this very page using the “Compare Products” feature and decide on product purchase.

Fully manageable functional

WOOT is extensible and rich in functionality plugin for woocommerce, which shows the products on the website in the form of tables with custom columns and has the most potent built-in filtering mechanism for products, such as price, category, attributes, metadata, etc. Because it has a modern architecture and only uses pure JavaScript code, it has excellent extensibility, which is proven by extensions such as “Compare Products”, “Favourites," and "Attachments." Today, not a single plugin for displaying products in the form of a table can brag of such rich functionality.
Front view (default skin)
Not to get ahead of ourselves, but the installation of product tables is possible right after the plugin installation with just a simple [woot] shortcode, which will expand the product table with pre-configured settings and the basic set of columns. Using the fantastic agility in configuration, you can configure the table columns as you wish, using the "columns" attribute of the shortcode: [woot columns=”id,title,price,pa_color,pa_size,products_cat,compare,add_to_cart”], keys for which are located in the “Settings” tab below:
Shortcode possible keys
It will be best to create the table using the plugin at the control panel:
Control panel

https://preview.redd.it/lp7zcurmuho51.png?width=1794&format=png&auto=webp&s=26753a32044769006ae596c5088b9b4b9960e903
The created table at the administrator's control panel is managed easier and can be inserted using a shortcode [woot id=1], where 1 is the table ID. At the first tab of table setting, you can add columns, give them a title, or change their order, set their options. Each column has its fine settings, depending on the column type:
https://preview.redd.it/xtcbd0epuho51.png?width=1791&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ab158f076494766d87fd36aebdb588d15c96e96
At the second tab of shortcode settings, you can connect your products' metadata to the display:
https://preview.redd.it/krrd62vquho51.png?width=1792&format=png&auto=webp&s=154bc275c677aa58ede14d324f95bcdad93436e0
The third tab offers a filter design. With a mouse, you can create a powerful AJAX filter, giving your customers the opportunity of finding what they are looking for without unnecessary movements and the on same time staing on the same page. All the filter elements have their settings depending on their type:
Filter constructor
The fourth tab offers a powerful mechanism, "Predefinition." This mechanism determines which products will be reflected by the table, for example – only best-sellers, or the newest ones, or according to a specific category or attribute simultaneously, or only from one author on the website, if your store is a platform. “Predefinition” works well with the filtering mechanism, understanding each other with ease.
Predefinition rules
The fifth tab allows you to customize the view of your table using the CSS. But keep in mind that WOOT contains built-in skins, and you can create your unique skins.
Custom CSS
The sixth tab contains many fine settings for product tables such as the number of products displayed per page, default sorting, print button, “Load more” button - which allows avoiding classic pagination, set up a compact size for mobile devices, sorting, shopping cart, and many more other settings.
Options
WOOT - WooCommerce Active Products Tables - there is a reason for the “Active” word in the title since except for the main shortcode [woot], it also provides a whole army of shortcodes which make your store more alive, active, and “sociable” for your visitor. For example, shortcode [woot_single] will open all the product’s characteristics. If you need to insert such a shortcode into the article on the website, you can do it with the [woot_single_btn] shortcode-button, helping your customer learn the product in detail. If someone needs to compare the products, there is a [woot_compare] shortcode. It will help the customer decide on the product selection and make a purchase without delay.
Compare products

Spreading your products throughout other websites

WOOT has a unique ability to spread your products on partner websites, whose website engines may not even be WordPress or even the average HTML site. Look here, please! Your store’s products can be seen anywhere and even support the referral program.

100% compatibility with WPML

Today, the world has become relatively compact and small, and that is why your website must be easy to understand for multi-lingual users of your website. The easier it is for the world to understand you, the more sales you will get. It is why the WOOT is entirely compatible with WPML and has the “Vocabulary” support mechanism, allowing to translate all the product tables to every language possible without any limitations. Create multi-lingual tables without restrictions on your desires!

Conclusion

WOOT opportunities are nearly limitless, and that is why this plugin is so unique on the market. With this plugin, you can enrich your website’s content, making it more interesting. It will make your visitors more loyal, which will lead to purchases on your website. The first purchase in the store, using this plugin, entirely recoups the investment of such a professional trading tool as “WOOT - WooCommerce Active Products Tables,” which points to its immediate recoupment. In other words, there is absolutely no risk, especially with the free version of the plugin, which will help you find new marketing opportunities in your business and significantly increase your profits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f1wyApG68Y
submitted by realmag777 to u/realmag777 [link] [comments]


2020.09.20 22:11 virtualpostmail Why You Need A Business Address

If you’re an online-only business or you don’t have a brick-and-mortar establishment, listing a real physical address for your business could be extremely useful.
While you might want to use a home address as a business address it doesn’t look professional and exposes your personal information to the public.
That’s why a lot of thought should go into what kind of business address you’re going to have. Don’t worry, you can learn all the options you have for a business address below. Read on for more.

What is a Business Address?

Here’s our definition, it is a separate address to use for your business operations and it can also be where your company can be contacted and receive communication.

The Biggest Problems a Business Address Fixes

Now, why should you use a business address? We won’t keep you guessing. Using a separate physical address as your business address (instead of your home) can make your company look more legitimate and encourage others to do business with you.
A physical business address that’s not the same as your residence can boost your credibility and professionalism and build trust with your customers, suppliers and partners. Here are more reasons you might want a separate business address below.

You Own an LLC or Corporation

If you have a LLC or corporation your mail needs to go to a physical street address in the same state as where your business was formed.
LLCs and corporations must also have a registered agent that maintains regular business hours and can receive official mail from the state. You can act as your own registered agent, but you lose a level of privacy because registered agent information, including their address, is publicly available.

You Run a Remote Business

If you’re running a remote business or even a digital nomad who’s always on the go and can work anywhere in the world, then maintaining a physical address could be difficult.
Even if you do keep an address, accessing your mail could be difficult when you’re trekking cross-country, or living in an entirely different hemisphere.

You’re Relocating or Expanding Your Remote Business

With moving homes or moving a business it’s easy for something to slip through the cracks when updating your change of address.
Getting a separate physical address helps you deal with those problems and provides it as your business correspondence address, and you can be sure of continuity of service.
If you’re expanding into a new region or state, then a business address there can also be very helpful for local presence. Note that you’ll need a registered agent in a new state.

Protecting Your Privacy

If you use your home address for your business, it will be made publicly available. You may prefer that clients, customers, and vendors don’t know your home address.
Having a separate business address will keep your personal information confidential in the following areas:
As a result, it allows for you to remain anonymous because you are able to use the business address on any public facing documentation. You can learn How to Maintain Privacy Protection with Your Home Address for Your Business.

Maintaining Your Business Image

Using your home address for your business can imply that your business is not legitimate, which can be detrimental when trying to attract clients, customers, and investors.
The image of you operating out of your dining room or from your sofa would make your organization appear unprofessional.
A separate business address will afford you:
Overall, a separate business address will instill trust and support your credibility to others.

How to Get a Business Address

Choosing a business address is based on your needs and what suits your business. The options will be discussed below.

Virtual Mailbox

Virtual mailbox services give you a street address to receive postal mail. The unopened envelopes are scanned and images of your mail are uploaded to your virtual mailbox for easy and fast access. Then, you decide whether to have the mail opened and scanned, mail forwarded, or destroyed.
A virtual mailbox also includes:
A virtual mailbox is an excellent choice for a more sophisticated way of managing mail and packages remotely especially useful if you are home-based business and digital nomad because you’ll have a fixed price regardless of mail volume. For more information you can read The Ultimate Guide to a Virtual Mailbox.

PO Box

A PO Box is a locked physical mailbox located in a post office. It keeps your home address private while offering confidentiality for your mail. This is a simple solution for business owners who don’t want their home address made public.
Here are some other advantages of having a PO Box:
If you have basic needs you might be able to use a PO Box for mail. However, PO Boxes do have disadvantages, such as:
You will also need to visit your PO Box to pick up mail to avoid overfilling it, or have it forwarded to another address, which having your mail forwarded to you from a PO Box is very costly and adds up!
It will often be more convenient for you to choose another address option, rather than maintaining several addresses for different types of correspondence, but it’ll depend on your reasons to get a PO Box like your mail volume. If a PO Box is the best fit for your needs you can learn the 3 steps to rent a PO Box.

Private Mailbox

Private mailboxes are located in malls, plazas, or retail centers, for example, the Postal Annex, PostNet or UPS Store. Private mailboxes can receive mail and parcels from any carrier, including FedEx, UPS, and USPS, which is the advantage over PO Boxes because they receive deliveries from USPS only.
Other benefits of having a private mailbox include:
The biggest downfall of a private mailbox is that you must physically travel to the location to pick up mail and packages.

Virtual Office

A virtual office or business center is a great choice when you want a professional image, but don’t want to manage an office.
It provides the benefits of a real physical address with the added bonus of office services. People like it because you get these benefits without actually taking on a long lease or hiring office staff yourself. It provides a mailing address plus phone answering, meeting room, and videoconferencing facilities. It can give the impression of a larger business, even if your company is quite small.
However, it can be a costly option and it’s best to compare what you need.

Coworking Spaces

If you’re a member of a coworking space, see if you can use the address as your business address. Check what the rules are on receiving mail to the coworking space and any services they offer like mail forwarding.
Coworking spaces provide all the same services and amenities of a traditional office but are much more flexible. You usually don’t need to sign a long term lease and some can even be rented by the hour. The common provisions of coworking spaces are Wi-Fi, meeting rooms and a printer. Most will also provide coffee and snacks to hungry workers.
Coworking spaces might also provide kitchens, hot-desks, conference rooms and more. They also give solo workers a chance to engage in a community. Many entrepreneurs, freelancers, start-up owners, and consultants find it a lonely life. Coworking spaces can offer collaboration and fellowship, even if it’s for different businesses.
WARNING
Depending on the type of business, a co-working office may not be the most secure place for files. You’ll also need to transport physical files everyday, which can cause lost or forgotten files.
Even if you do not carry around physical paper files, but you keep your clients computer files on a cloud server, most cloud offices do not provide wired access to the internet, but instead only offer WiFi. This can be a serious disadvantage if you need secure access, as wireless internet is the first place that hackers look to access secure files on computers and to gain access to their passwords and security protocols.
Along with compromised security, the privacy of your work and conversations are at a higher risk of being compromised. You'll be in open areas and if you do not pay for a meeting room you'll often have conversations in the common area for others to hear.

Commercial Offices

Commercial offices are often found in office buildings, shopping malls, and other buildings and are available for rent or sale.
The commercial office option is the traditional way of having a physical business address. It gives a place for customers to visit and a workplace for your employees. Thus if these are essential requirements for your business then it’s best to choose a commercial office.
Whether you decide to rent or buy an office space will depend on many variables, including your financial state, business growth, and tax considerations. It will be a heavy investment and the most expensive option out of this list so that is important to consider your operational and financial position.

Conclusion

After evaluating and comparing all the options available, a virtual mailbox is likely the best solution. Given the cost and services of choice, this is probably the best value for anyone who doesn’t need a physical office space and is working remotely.
A virtual mailbox gives all the benefits of a professional office address without leasing an office, which is cost-effective and allows your home address to remain private.
Get a virtual mailbox today and benefit from a professional business image and peace of mind knowing your personal information will remain private.
submitted by virtualpostmail to u/virtualpostmail [link] [comments]


2020.09.20 17:17 AceTheBot u/MvKal found the post

What do you think of this essay that estimates the factors involved in female mating preferences?
Part I
Few questions are as important as the following: what selection pressures are humans facing, and are they eugenic or dysgenic? In other words, are we evolving or devolving? Of central importance to this question is the practice of human reproduction: children are produced when a man fucks a woman. The genes that lead to fucking, therefore, are the genes that are being selected for. So what genes are these? Who gets laid?
It does not suffice to use anecdotes. Sure, they may be correct at the end of the day, but on the other hand they may not be. Therefore let us approach this topic scientifically; no dudebro philosophy about game and muscles and whatever else here. Besides, men are hardly unified on what they think their anecdotes signify: one hopeful man will say it’s all about game, while another pessimistic man will say it’s the face, yet another will say muscles, and another money, et cetera ad infinitum.
Let us phrase the question scientifically: what factors explain what proportion of that variance in male romantic success? This question implies that the club scene will not be analyzed. Women may choose differently for one night stands than they will for a reproductive partner, and most children are intended or at least with a monogamous partner in the age of birth control and abortion.
Looking into the scientific literature on this question is quite frustrating. Frankly, it’s quite bad and I have only been able to unearth a few studies that offer only hesitant, partial answers. Yet the available evidence does allow a few important facts to be clear, and with sufficient reasoning other facts can be inferred. Probably the best study relevant to the question was one published in 2017 that asked women to rate men based on a photo and one of three descriptions of three traits each that were intended to be highly desirable, desirable, or less desirable. The women gave ratings for physical attractiveness, behavioral desirability, and dating desirability. It was found using multiple linear regression analysis (MLR) that sr2 was 0.55 for physical attractiveness and .20 for personality rating on the average. This means those two ratings alone accounted for 75% of the variance in dating desirability scores and that physical attractiveness accounted for 55% of that variance by itself, or in other words it accounted for 55% of the variance after factoring out its covariance with personality score and so on for the personality score. One interesting thing to note is that they also asked the same thing to the mothers of the women and found that physical attractiveness accounts for about 33% of the variance and personality accounts for about 40% of the variance in regards to how much the mothers desires their daughter to date the given man. This means that in traditional days, it can be inferred, at least according to this study, that reputation mattered much more than looks.
And let me comment on the word I used in the last sentence: reputation. That is precisely what the women and mothers were rating. This is, in essence, a component of social status and not direct behavior or “game” ability, and this is further evidenced by the fact that the men were described using reputation words - “trustworthy”, not “interesting”, mature, not “easy to get along with”. They were described in ways that their community as a whole would think of them, not in ways that are specifically meant to bring to mind the way the man will treat the woman. So being generous, we can say that direct behavior might account for the missing variance and maybe a small part of the reputation variance, meaning it might be as high as 30% but no higher. On the other hand, it could still be conceivably as low as 0% based on this single study.
What do other studies show? One type of attraction study seems to indicate that attraction has little to do with direct behavior, or in other words the personality that the woman experiences. These studies typically simulate dating in a controlled fashion and ask the participants the degree to which they would like to go on another date with whoever they met. One study published in 1966 found “The correlation between liking of the date and evaluation of the date's physical attractiveness is .78 for male subjects and .69 for female subjects” (4). The subjects’ looks were rapidly rated by four random raters, meaning that it is unlikely that the ratings were inflated or deflated by personality. R2 for women, then, is about 0.5, which means that about 50% of the variance in female desire to see the male date again can be explained by the male’s physicality alone. This is obviously in line with the findings of the 2017 study, meaning that this result has been replicated half a century later. The 1966 study also gave personality tests to the subjects: masculinity correlated with the female wanting to see the male again at r = 0.12, extroversion at r = 0.10, good manners at r = .12, and “self-acceptance” (confidence) at r = .14. In other words, variance in being a super-wacky extrovert, having good manners, acting “masculine”, and being confident account for essentially none of the variance in if the male is wanted by the female again. The study concluded that out of the metrics they scored, only physical attraviness predicted the women wanting to see the men again.
Another study from 2009 essentially replicated this finding (6). This study had the participants fill out tests to measure personality and then had them participate in a speed-dating event where each male met ten females and vice versa. Physique was pre-rated by each researcher with high reliability (intercorrelation = 0.86). These pre-rated scores correlated at r=0.88 (r2 = 0.77) with the extent to which the female wanted to see the male again after the date. Men were allowed to seduce, display IDGAF and abundance attitudes, and generally mog for five minutes. Still, “interest in sport activities” (r = 0.48, r2 = 0.23), which probably covaries with the physique pre-ratings (as I will explain), and physique were the only predictive variables. Big 5 traits correlated at most at r = 0.26 but were not statistically significant (p < 5%). One interesting thing to note is that the sample consisted of college students with an average age of 19; Interest in sportsball might have functioned as a serious reflector of status since women generally cannot gauge status based on jobs and money when it comes to 19 year old college students yet. Fresh out of high school, they were likely still influenced by propaganda that designates the sportsball players as high-status and popular.
As far as I have found, these studies are the cream of the crop when it comes to those which attempt to estimate the factors that predict male romantic success. Despite the field being quite barren, conclusions can still be drawn considering all of the studies have more than adequate statistical power and each agrees with one another. Physical attractiveness matters the most: each study estimates its predictive power at at least half the variance. Status matters, but less than physique. Direct behavior, or personality, explains little to none of the variance. This does not mean that a 5/10 trainwreck, anxious autist couldn’t get more girls if he somehow improved his social skills, but it indicates that game doesn’t work or is at least extremely rare within the samples. It does show that more natural differences in personality traits, ranging from extroversion to confidence, matter very little. Given that much of game consists of essentially telling guys to be more extroverted and confident, these studies suggest that that aspect of game is bogus.
Based on these results, I predict that if I were to run my ideal experiment and find how much variance physique, direct behavior, and status explain, I would see about 60%, 5%, and 35% respectively. Let us then apply the knowledge of this educated estimation on a number of hypothetical cases. Case 1: a man who is 5’8” with a 50th percentile face and a typical, skinnyfat body shape. He is somewhat introverted and has a few close friends, and is in university. He comes to me for my sage-like wisdom and asks, “O, wise one, what shall acquireth me the womb?” There are only two questions to ask him: “are you autistic?” and “do you have social anxiety?”. When he answers no to both, I give him my knowledge: “do thou worketh out and build thy muscle, and go on and gaineth thou status. Then the womb shall be for thee.” If his direct behavior is not an absolute trainwreck, if he is not a terrible autist, then no amount of confidence-game will help him. He already has sufficient confidence: if he didn’t, the variance in direct behavior would explain more of the variance in romantic success because a large number of men would be capitalizing off this easy “biohack”. Women don’t like him because he’s an overall 4/10 physically and has no status because he has few friends, no fame, and no money. Approaching 100 random women will most likely net 99 to 100 rejections by his looks alone. The ugly girls that go on one date with him will friendzone him when they find out he doesn’t like sports and he has 2 friends. And so Case 1 goes on, gets ripped, and makes some more friends and some notoriety and finally he finds a woman. Case 2: a 6’2” man who has been working out for a year and has something to show for it, with an average to above average face, approaches and says, trembling, “What do I do? I have been following the advice you gave Case 1 for a year and still I have no girlfriend.” I ask my questions, and he responds, “I-I have a lot of confidence issues and a lot of social anxiety with women.” He makes no eye contact and his voice is monotone. I tell him, “you are the one who is so rare that you do not even register in the variance in direct behavior in my studies of wisdom. You need to cure your autism, learn to make eye contact and stop turning off girls who would otherwise be into you by physically trembling when you approach them.” Later that night, he bangs 3 girls from the club because he took Xannies to control his shaking and MDMA to cure his autism. Finally, case three: the ghost of Elliot Rodger comes up from hell and asks me why no girls wanted him. I say to him: “You are physically a 4/10. You are an extreme malet who is half asian AND you have no status and who knows how autistic you were in your interaction with people. Surprisingly, despite constant propaganda telling them to race-mix, the innate urge against it is so strong that 90-95% of women date within their race, and if they do race-mix, you better know it’s a rich white male or at least a ripped black gangster with a BBC. It’s not a skinny, manlet happa. She can find a white manlet if that’s her thing.” He proclaims “Blackpilled Again!” as he descends back into hell.
Part II
I am going to justify the obvious: female physical preferences are dysgenic. You already knew this if your IQ is above 120, but nowhere have I seen this formally argued for. In fact, it is rather common for people on the forums I frequent to imply that selecting for muscles is eugenic. They are quite wrong. “By the age of 19, 80% of US males and 75% of women have lost their virginity, and 87% of college students have had sex. But this number appears to be much lower at elite colleges. Only 56% of Princeton undergraduates have had intercourse. At Harvard 59% of the undergraduates are non-virgins, and at MIT, only a slight majority, 51%, have had intercourse. Further, only 65% of MIT graduate students have had sex.” (17)
It has been clear since at least The Bell Curve that IQ is being selected against. The proposed causes for this phenomenon range from welfare checks to those with higher IQs acting more responsible. One overlooked cause is female mate preference: women care greatly about their partners physicality, and their physical preferences select against IQ and Need-For-Cognition (NFC). This is not to some great benefit in some other trait: outside of their preferences against the obese and the horrifically diseased, female physical preferences are stuck in 9000 BC. In other words, the trait they are selecting for is strength. Health is neutral or selected against, and intellect is certainly selected against due to the outdated, innate preferences of women.
In order to analyze the dysgenic effect of female physical preference, it would be helpful to know what exactly they are selecting for. One study indicates that above height and facial attractiveness, women appreciate large muscles (16). However, it is not necessary to derive a predictive model for physical attractiveness in men which assigns a percent of the variance explained to each trait, nor is it likely possible considering the current level of data. The reason why it is not necessary is because studies have already shown what factors women find physically attractive, and each can be shown to be dysgenic to some extent. These other factors are height and facial masculinity.
Having large muscles negatively correlated with intelligence and intellectual attitude. Having a higher NFC, or tendency to think deeply, strongly predicts spending less time in the gym compared to those with low to average NFC (8). Furthermore, time spent in the gym negatively correlates moderately with IQ (r ~ -0.30). Although some research indicates that muscle strength is linked to a longer life, this is likely flawed data due to obese subjects and the fact that most of it is collected on elderly people. Of course stronger elderly people are healthier, but why are they stronger? It is because they have not degenerated as much due to their genes. Even if it were to be accepted that strength correlates with health, the net effect of selecting for strong over nonobese, average men is still dysgenic because it selects against IQ. Furthermore, high IQ men that are selected against due to outdated female preferences are likely as healthy or healthier than resistance trainers because IQ is associated with longevity in itself (19), despite the fact that men with higher IQs exercise less. Next is the face. Facial attractiveness in men is associated with “perceived health” but not with real measures of health and virility (20). It is largely thought that women are attracted to faces of higher Testosterone men -- there is a negative or neutral correlation of testosterone with immune response (12,14). Testosterone is also negatively associated with longevity (21). Finally, there is no association between IQ and facial attractiveness on the genetic level according to twin data (11).
As for height: women like taller men and taller men are less healthy (18). A taller man in 9000 BC, however, is more likely to beat an equally healthy manlet in a fight. In 2020, the manlet will just pull a gun and the taller man will die.
As I previously wrote, physicality seems to explain more than half of the variance in male romantic success. Not only is physical attractiveness largely irrelevant to fitness in 2020, it is actually at least slightly unfit given its negative correlation with intelligence and need for cognition. Many healthy men are getting cheated out of children because in the eyes of women they are 4/10s, when in the reality of 2020 they are no less fit than an “attractive” man. Despite their face and their stature, they will probably live healthily to a ripe old age and they are likely to actually have a higher IQ than an “attractive” man. The solution is to enact what made Europe great from the beginning: enforced monogamy. Make average looking women settle for average looking men again. This model is both historically standard and has the benefit of not selecting against high IQ children like the fornication model of 2020 does.
Part III
I won’t say much on status and its dysgenic effects other than surveyed women say they actively prefer dumber guys than they could otherwise get. More specifically, when offered a choice between a 99th percentile IQ and a 90th percentile IQ man, they choose the latter (22). With other traits, such as kindness, they pick 99th percentile: as much as they can get.
The reason for this is probably mostly found in anti-intelligence propaganda like the nonexistent archetype of the “nerd”. Regardless, the only thing that saves high IQ men is money, but they’re often old if they get enough of it at all, and end up with a settled down 30 year old fresh off the cock carousel. IQ goes down every year, and women are to blame, at least in part. They choose every day to reproduce with dumber men due to their superior physique or status instead of reproducing with otherwise average high IQ men. This effect is dysgenic and female preference should be disregarded insofar as is required to correct the direction of our evolution.
Sources: https://oligarchicalneoformalism.blogspot.com/2020/02/part-i-few-questions-are-as-important.html
TLDR: Read it lazy. Or at least read paragraph 10 :)
submitted by AceTheBot to ATBandATGcommunity [link] [comments]


2020.09.20 17:13 AceTheBot A person posted this to r/AskTeenGirls back in March

What do you think of this essay that estimates the factors involved in female mating preferences?
Part I
Few questions are as important as the following: what selection pressures are humans facing, and are they eugenic or dysgenic? In other words, are we evolving or devolving? Of central importance to this question is the practice of human reproduction: children are produced when a man fucks a woman. The genes that lead to fucking, therefore, are the genes that are being selected for. So what genes are these? Who gets laid?
It does not suffice to use anecdotes. Sure, they may be correct at the end of the day, but on the other hand they may not be. Therefore let us approach this topic scientifically; no dudebro philosophy about game and muscles and whatever else here. Besides, men are hardly unified on what they think their anecdotes signify: one hopeful man will say it’s all about game, while another pessimistic man will say it’s the face, yet another will say muscles, and another money, et cetera ad infinitum.
Let us phrase the question scientifically: what factors explain what proportion of that variance in male romantic success? This question implies that the club scene will not be analyzed. Women may choose differently for one night stands than they will for a reproductive partner, and most children are intended or at least with a monogamous partner in the age of birth control and abortion.
Looking into the scientific literature on this question is quite frustrating. Frankly, it’s quite bad and I have only been able to unearth a few studies that offer only hesitant, partial answers. Yet the available evidence does allow a few important facts to be clear, and with sufficient reasoning other facts can be inferred. Probably the best study relevant to the question was one published in 2017 that asked women to rate men based on a photo and one of three descriptions of three traits each that were intended to be highly desirable, desirable, or less desirable. The women gave ratings for physical attractiveness, behavioral desirability, and dating desirability. It was found using multiple linear regression analysis (MLR) that sr2 was 0.55 for physical attractiveness and .20 for personality rating on the average. This means those two ratings alone accounted for 75% of the variance in dating desirability scores and that physical attractiveness accounted for 55% of that variance by itself, or in other words it accounted for 55% of the variance after factoring out its covariance with personality score and so on for the personality score. One interesting thing to note is that they also asked the same thing to the mothers of the women and found that physical attractiveness accounts for about 33% of the variance and personality accounts for about 40% of the variance in regards to how much the mothers desires their daughter to date the given man. This means that in traditional days, it can be inferred, at least according to this study, that reputation mattered much more than looks.
And let me comment on the word I used in the last sentence: reputation. That is precisely what the women and mothers were rating. This is, in essence, a component of social status and not direct behavior or “game” ability, and this is further evidenced by the fact that the men were described using reputation words - “trustworthy”, not “interesting”, mature, not “easy to get along with”. They were described in ways that their community as a whole would think of them, not in ways that are specifically meant to bring to mind the way the man will treat the woman. So being generous, we can say that direct behavior might account for the missing variance and maybe a small part of the reputation variance, meaning it might be as high as 30% but no higher. On the other hand, it could still be conceivably as low as 0% based on this single study.
What do other studies show? One type of attraction study seems to indicate that attraction has little to do with direct behavior, or in other words the personality that the woman experiences. These studies typically simulate dating in a controlled fashion and ask the participants the degree to which they would like to go on another date with whoever they met. One study published in 1966 found “The correlation between liking of the date and evaluation of the date's physical attractiveness is .78 for male subjects and .69 for female subjects” (4). The subjects’ looks were rapidly rated by four random raters, meaning that it is unlikely that the ratings were inflated or deflated by personality. R2 for women, then, is about 0.5, which means that about 50% of the variance in female desire to see the male date again can be explained by the male’s physicality alone. This is obviously in line with the findings of the 2017 study, meaning that this result has been replicated half a century later. The 1966 study also gave personality tests to the subjects: masculinity correlated with the female wanting to see the male again at r = 0.12, extroversion at r = 0.10, good manners at r = .12, and “self-acceptance” (confidence) at r = .14. In other words, variance in being a super-wacky extrovert, having good manners, acting “masculine”, and being confident account for essentially none of the variance in if the male is wanted by the female again. The study concluded that out of the metrics they scored, only physical attraviness predicted the women wanting to see the men again.
Another study from 2009 essentially replicated this finding (6). This study had the participants fill out tests to measure personality and then had them participate in a speed-dating event where each male met ten females and vice versa. Physique was pre-rated by each researcher with high reliability (intercorrelation = 0.86). These pre-rated scores correlated at r=0.88 (r2 = 0.77) with the extent to which the female wanted to see the male again after the date. Men were allowed to seduce, display IDGAF and abundance attitudes, and generally mog for five minutes. Still, “interest in sport activities” (r = 0.48, r2 = 0.23), which probably covaries with the physique pre-ratings (as I will explain), and physique were the only predictive variables. Big 5 traits correlated at most at r = 0.26 but were not statistically significant (p < 5%). One interesting thing to note is that the sample consisted of college students with an average age of 19; Interest in sportsball might have functioned as a serious reflector of status since women generally cannot gauge status based on jobs and money when it comes to 19 year old college students yet. Fresh out of high school, they were likely still influenced by propaganda that designates the sportsball players as high-status and popular.
As far as I have found, these studies are the cream of the crop when it comes to those which attempt to estimate the factors that predict male romantic success. Despite the field being quite barren, conclusions can still be drawn considering all of the studies have more than adequate statistical power and each agrees with one another. Physical attractiveness matters the most: each study estimates its predictive power at at least half the variance. Status matters, but less than physique. Direct behavior, or personality, explains little to none of the variance. This does not mean that a 5/10 trainwreck, anxious autist couldn’t get more girls if he somehow improved his social skills, but it indicates that game doesn’t work or is at least extremely rare within the samples. It does show that more natural differences in personality traits, ranging from extroversion to confidence, matter very little. Given that much of game consists of essentially telling guys to be more extroverted and confident, these studies suggest that that aspect of game is bogus.
Based on these results, I predict that if I were to run my ideal experiment and find how much variance physique, direct behavior, and status explain, I would see about 60%, 5%, and 35% respectively. Let us then apply the knowledge of this educated estimation on a number of hypothetical cases. Case 1: a man who is 5’8” with a 50th percentile face and a typical, skinnyfat body shape. He is somewhat introverted and has a few close friends, and is in university. He comes to me for my sage-like wisdom and asks, “O, wise one, what shall acquireth me the womb?” There are only two questions to ask him: “are you autistic?” and “do you have social anxiety?”. When he answers no to both, I give him my knowledge: “do thou worketh out and build thy muscle, and go on and gaineth thou status. Then the womb shall be for thee.” If his direct behavior is not an absolute trainwreck, if he is not a terrible autist, then no amount of confidence-game will help him. He already has sufficient confidence: if he didn’t, the variance in direct behavior would explain more of the variance in romantic success because a large number of men would be capitalizing off this easy “biohack”. Women don’t like him because he’s an overall 4/10 physically and has no status because he has few friends, no fame, and no money. Approaching 100 random women will most likely net 99 to 100 rejections by his looks alone. The ugly girls that go on one date with him will friendzone him when they find out he doesn’t like sports and he has 2 friends. And so Case 1 goes on, gets ripped, and makes some more friends and some notoriety and finally he finds a woman. Case 2: a 6’2” man who has been working out for a year and has something to show for it, with an average to above average face, approaches and says, trembling, “What do I do? I have been following the advice you gave Case 1 for a year and still I have no girlfriend.” I ask my questions, and he responds, “I-I have a lot of confidence issues and a lot of social anxiety with women.” He makes no eye contact and his voice is monotone. I tell him, “you are the one who is so rare that you do not even register in the variance in direct behavior in my studies of wisdom. You need to cure your autism, learn to make eye contact and stop turning off girls who would otherwise be into you by physically trembling when you approach them.” Later that night, he bangs 3 girls from the club because he took Xannies to control his shaking and MDMA to cure his autism. Finally, case three: the ghost of Elliot Rodger comes up from hell and asks me why no girls wanted him. I say to him: “You are physically a 4/10. You are an extreme malet who is half asian AND you have no status and who knows how autistic you were in your interaction with people. Surprisingly, despite constant propaganda telling them to race-mix, the innate urge against it is so strong that 90-95% of women date within their race, and if they do race-mix, you better know it’s a rich white male or at least a ripped black gangster with a BBC. It’s not a skinny, manlet happa. She can find a white manlet if that’s her thing.” He proclaims “Blackpilled Again!” as he descends back into hell.
Part II
I am going to justify the obvious: female physical preferences are dysgenic. You already knew this if your IQ is above 120, but nowhere have I seen this formally argued for. In fact, it is rather common for people on the forums I frequent to imply that selecting for muscles is eugenic. They are quite wrong. “By the age of 19, 80% of US males and 75% of women have lost their virginity, and 87% of college students have had sex. But this number appears to be much lower at elite colleges. Only 56% of Princeton undergraduates have had intercourse. At Harvard 59% of the undergraduates are non-virgins, and at MIT, only a slight majority, 51%, have had intercourse. Further, only 65% of MIT graduate students have had sex.” (17)
It has been clear since at least The Bell Curve that IQ is being selected against. The proposed causes for this phenomenon range from welfare checks to those with higher IQs acting more responsible. One overlooked cause is female mate preference: women care greatly about their partners physicality, and their physical preferences select against IQ and Need-For-Cognition (NFC). This is not to some great benefit in some other trait: outside of their preferences against the obese and the horrifically diseased, female physical preferences are stuck in 9000 BC. In other words, the trait they are selecting for is strength. Health is neutral or selected against, and intellect is certainly selected against due to the outdated, innate preferences of women.
In order to analyze the dysgenic effect of female physical preference, it would be helpful to know what exactly they are selecting for. One study indicates that above height and facial attractiveness, women appreciate large muscles (16). However, it is not necessary to derive a predictive model for physical attractiveness in men which assigns a percent of the variance explained to each trait, nor is it likely possible considering the current level of data. The reason why it is not necessary is because studies have already shown what factors women find physically attractive, and each can be shown to be dysgenic to some extent. These other factors are height and facial masculinity.
Having large muscles negatively correlated with intelligence and intellectual attitude. Having a higher NFC, or tendency to think deeply, strongly predicts spending less time in the gym compared to those with low to average NFC (8). Furthermore, time spent in the gym negatively correlates moderately with IQ (r ~ -0.30). Although some research indicates that muscle strength is linked to a longer life, this is likely flawed data due to obese subjects and the fact that most of it is collected on elderly people. Of course stronger elderly people are healthier, but why are they stronger? It is because they have not degenerated as much due to their genes. Even if it were to be accepted that strength correlates with health, the net effect of selecting for strong over nonobese, average men is still dysgenic because it selects against IQ. Furthermore, high IQ men that are selected against due to outdated female preferences are likely as healthy or healthier than resistance trainers because IQ is associated with longevity in itself (19), despite the fact that men with higher IQs exercise less. Next is the face. Facial attractiveness in men is associated with “perceived health” but not with real measures of health and virility (20). It is largely thought that women are attracted to faces of higher Testosterone men -- there is a negative or neutral correlation of testosterone with immune response (12,14). Testosterone is also negatively associated with longevity (21). Finally, there is no association between IQ and facial attractiveness on the genetic level according to twin data (11).
As for height: women like taller men and taller men are less healthy (18). A taller man in 9000 BC, however, is more likely to beat an equally healthy manlet in a fight. In 2020, the manlet will just pull a gun and the taller man will die.
As I previously wrote, physicality seems to explain more than half of the variance in male romantic success. Not only is physical attractiveness largely irrelevant to fitness in 2020, it is actually at least slightly unfit given its negative correlation with intelligence and need for cognition. Many healthy men are getting cheated out of children because in the eyes of women they are 4/10s, when in the reality of 2020 they are no less fit than an “attractive” man. Despite their face and their stature, they will probably live healthily to a ripe old age and they are likely to actually have a higher IQ than an “attractive” man. The solution is to enact what made Europe great from the beginning: enforced monogamy. Make average looking women settle for average looking men again. This model is both historically standard and has the benefit of not selecting against high IQ children like the fornication model of 2020 does.
Part III
I won’t say much on status and its dysgenic effects other than surveyed women say they actively prefer dumber guys than they could otherwise get. More specifically, when offered a choice between a 99th percentile IQ and a 90th percentile IQ man, they choose the latter (22). With other traits, such as kindness, they pick 99th percentile: as much as they can get.
The reason for this is probably mostly found in anti-intelligence propaganda like the nonexistent archetype of the “nerd”. Regardless, the only thing that saves high IQ men is money, but they’re often old if they get enough of it at all, and end up with a settled down 30 year old fresh off the cock carousel. IQ goes down every year, and women are to blame, at least in part. They choose every day to reproduce with dumber men due to their superior physique or status instead of reproducing with otherwise average high IQ men. This effect is dysgenic and female preference should be disregarded insofar as is required to correct the direction of our evolution.
Sources: https://oligarchicalneoformalism.blogspot.com/2020/02/part-i-few-questions-are-as-important.html
TLDR: Read it lazy. Or at least read paragraph 10 :)
submitted by AceTheBot to copypasta [link] [comments]


2020.09.20 09:38 Black_Lister Homecoming - Part 2

A/N: Man, the 40-thousand character limit on reddit is reeaaally forcing me to cut my chapters into pieces here. Oh well, c'est la vie. Enjoy!
Previous Chapter Next Chapter
---------------------------------------
Adam quietly tugged the cowl of his cloak over his face as he walked the paved streets of the fishing village, though perhaps that was an improper descriptor.
Búrin-Hér was small by normal standards: about six miles in circumference and situated on the coast of Lake Greenstills, named so for the emerald green stones at the bottom of the lake. The stones, while worth some value were ultimately not worth the effort to mine, particularly since the green light refracted from the sun through the water acted as a stimulant, improving the spawning rate of many species of fish, and encouraging the fish to grow to an enormous size. The city was well known for its carp analogues, though also sold other seafood such as largemouth bass and crayfish as well.
Honestly, he wouldn’t mind stealing a boat, grabbing a fishing pole and lingering on the lake for a day. Maybe even two.
Sadly though, that was not an option… Well, not this time. There was always next time though, right?
“That’s like the third time you’ve sighed since we got here, special agent Hill.”
He was brought out of his thoughts by the commanding and feminine voice of his companion.
“Was that out-loud?” he asked in surprise. He’d not thought he was that put out... Maybe he missed fishing more than he thought.
Lillith Bucannon looked at him through the opaque visor of her helmet, identical to his own, and he could imagine her glowing cyan eyes crinkling in amusement.
That was one thing (among many) he had to get used to. Ever since magic had first been discovered in this world, those exposed to the very ether of this place had begun to change. Magic, mana, prana, od, the energy of the world.... whatever you wanted to call it, would gradually, and without fail change a person in equally gradual though notable ways. For sergeant Bucannon, her changes were in her hair and eyes, both turning to a luminescent sky blue when she drew upon mana for her magic.
Despite his incessant curiosity, he never did have the guts to ask if the carpet matched the drapes…
“Keep it up, agent Hill and I’ll report you for sexual harassment.”
He felt a cold sweat on his neck. “What’d I do?”
She turned to him and he could swear he saw her eyes light up dimly behind her visor. “Oh?” She exclaimed. “Are you saying you weren’t thinking about something incredibly inappropriate right now?”
Adam frowned and leaned in to scrutinize her just as carefully. “And what would make you think I was? Last I checked, you weren’t a telepath."
She turned her head away with a dismissive snort. “Of course not. If I were, that would make me an Evader, and unlike you, I don’t buck the system because it suits my fancy. You know as well as I do that the consequences for possessing an unregistered ability are quite severe, special agent Hill. ”
“Oh, perish the thought!” Adam waved his hands exaggeratedly. “Lillith Bucannon break a rule? Armageddon cometh.”
He could feel her ire-filled gaze without even looking. Of course, he didn’t believe it himself. He was a realist, and the reality is that everyone is a liar. Humans justify their deceptions with one reason or another, but lies are lies all the same. He had no doubt the woman was hiding something. And he was pathological when it came to figuring out what people lie about. Lies protect secrets, and secrets are almost always dark. Learn a person’s secret, and you wield a power no one else on earth can.
But he was in no position to rush things.
Truth be told, though he had long been suspicious of what secrets the sergeant might be hiding, he was actually quite fond of her, not that any outsider might think so, given the frequency with which they traded barbed words. Even if he did find out, he was in no mind expose them. Besides, he wasn’t about to antagonize someone who could easily break his arm if he pissed her off; she was, after all, a superb close-quarters combatant.
“Oh please, I’ve broken my share of rules. But not all rules are equal, Hill. There are some lines you don’t cross.” She fixed him with a look, their gazes meeting behind opaque visors. “And I don’t need telepathy to feel your eyes on my ass.”
A small heat ran through his chest. He suppressed a nervous grin. Guilty or innocent, awkward situations always brought out an unbidden, mischievous smile. "'Fraid you're mistaken. I don’t have the balls to stare at your ass, ma’am.”
He felt sergeant Bucannon give him the silent, side-eye treatment for several seconds before huffing. “Hill, you’re an asshole.”
He raised an eyebrow. “Asshole? Yesterday I was a dumbass, and today I’m an asshole? I can't tell... Is that promotion or demotion?”
“It’s a keep-moving-motion, asshole,” she clarified as they moved along.
There was precious little security in the streets of Búrin-Hér. Contrary to popular opinion, not all elves and dwarves hated each other. Just… most of them… So with Búrin-Hér being a dwarven village not far from elf lands, it wasn’t so strange a thing to see two figures of elf-stature like them walking the town's streets. Even so, the less attention they drew the better.
The only problem was that while Lillith Bucannon had risen to the rank of sergeant on her own power before being assigned to the 3rd MagiCorp Division and developing her talents in the field of magecraft, Adam Hill had been specially assigned to her unit due to his unique skills. Command took one look at his skillset and said ‘I want that,’ and in their infinite wisdom felt they should hire the man without giving him a lick of military training first. Thus, she had to deal with an undisciplined man-child with no sense of propriety or concern for his or anyone else’s well-being.
…In her opinion, of course.
Truth be told, she was a little envious of his ability to feel so carefree and relaxed in tense situations. Maybe he was just too stupid to realize how serious the situation was? Not that that exactly boded well for this infiltration mission.
But despite herself, Bucannon had to be honest and admit it; when it came down to it (and differences aside) they really did make an excellent team.
“The contact's home should be on Ka-… Kan-dur…” She looked the piece of paper in her hand, angling it this way and that. “Kan-dúr-ak road? Ugh, I can’t pronounce this B.S. to save my life. Hey Hill, you’re a nerd. How do you pronounce it?”
He felt an eye twitch unbidden at her patronizing tone. “What makes you think I know how to speak dwarvish?”
She shrugged her shoulders. “…Because you’re a nerd?” As if it were the most obvious truth in the world.
Adam took a pausing breath and spoke in a satisfyingly irritated tone. “Listen here, sarge. Dwarves are a jealous, untrusting people and don’t teach ‘khuzdul’ to outsiders. Ever. So no one outside their race knows how to speak it. If you'd read Lord of the Rings before, you’d know that.”
She tried to suppress a snort, but failed to keep herself from laughing quietly. “Nerd.”
Adam’s eye narrowed at her. “Uncultured swine.”
“Sorry, what was that? I could have sworn I just heard you call me a pig.” She countered, her tone taking a turn for the dangerous.
He waved her off. “You must have heard wrong. That would be insulting… To the pig.”
Her simmering blood compelled a equally scathing response, which was on the very tip of her tongue when Hill’s arm shot out and stopped her in her tracks.
“We’re here,” he announced, all mirth vanished from his voice. She looked at the door frame and squinted. The language was written in common tongue for the benefit of the masses. The address was correct.
“So we are,” she agreed, tabling her grievances for the moment. The mission came first, always.
She gave a rhythmic knock and took a step back from the door. Hill kept a watchful, if casual, eye on the street. Several seconds passed before the door opened with a creak, a single eye peering from the darkness.
“Hello, sir. Interested in a slice of avocado toast?”
The door opened fully to reveal a stocky dwarf with a thick brown beard that almost eclipsed the shirt and coat beneath it. “Only every Tuesday. Come in.” The homeowner ushered them in quickly. Giving the street a last careful look, he closed the door behind them.
“Speak free here, friends,” the dwarf said as soon as the door was closed and he checked with a device in the corner of the room. “We are safe from prying eyes and ears.”
The woman fixed the creature with an all-business look that was lost behind her opaque visor. “Agent Khuzan, I’m sergeant Bucannon, this is special agent Hill. What do you have for us?”
The dwarf stroked his great beard and pulled from beneath it a stack of papers sewn at the spine with fine thread. “It’s all right here,” he said as he flung it onto the table between them with a satisfying slap. "Please, sit."
The sergeant turned the bundle around with her fingers and slid it in front of her, paging through the report with brief scrutiny as they sat as bidden.
The woman's resulting silence left Hill exchanging glances with the dwarf as he continued to stroke his long beard. At last she closed the report and handed it to her companion. “Page seven,” she directed simply.
Hill gave her a look before taking the thing and thumbing through to the page in question, spending some time reading before his eyebrows shot up behind his visor. “Command didn’t inform us of this,” he said, returning his attention to the packet and flipping to skim the proceeding page.
“No. They didn’t,” she confirmed gravely. She fixed the short creature with a look that this time was not lost on it. “When did you receive these orders, agent Khuzan?”
The stunted thing responded with a twinkle in his eye. “Some weeks ago… the twenty-sixth of March I think it was. I doubt they expected me to be so quick to complete their request.”
The two actors exchanged a glance, as if in silent discussion. The report indicated that Command had requested a sample of indigenous "human" life from this side of the portal, and so had ordered the dwarf to acquire it in as expedient and subtle a manner as was possible. And Khuzan son of Khubar had done just so. Now, without warning, they would need to escort said specimen from the city and back home, or else return and request a more specialized team to come and perform the retrieval.
But then, what would that say about their abilities?
“How long have you been in possession of the… uh, specimen,” Hill questioned.
“Three days. It is quite domesticated.”
They returned their eyes to each other, again communing in silence. Based on their limited knowledge of this world, it was incredibly common for a human, as all humans were considered enslaved from conception, to be found in the possession of an average citizen. Their next question was answered unbidden.
“If… erm, what’s the word your people used…” Khuzan mumbled thoughtfully. “Extraction isn’t possible today, it’s no inconvenience to me to keep it for a little longer. It's been taught to sew, and fishing nets always need mending around here.”
The sergeant let out a thoughtful breath. “What about you, agent Khuzan? Would people start talking if a slave you just bought suddenly disappeared?”
A hearty rumble escaped the dwarf’s chest and he pulled out a chair and sat. “Folk don’t pay much heed to a neighbor’s livestock unless it’s of particular pedigree. Besides, it would be no stretch to claim that it fell over and drowned while helping me fish. Most of their like don’t know how to swim, you see.”
“And people would buy that?” Hill asked. Khuzan’s brow wrinkled in confusion. Hill realized his error and rephrased. “People would believe that?”
Some colloquialisms just didn’t translate well.
“Ah, yes, I’m confident. Though if I were to perhaps buy another and it too went missing, then I’d be hard pressed to explain myself, except with supreme incompetence.”
Bucannon turned to her teammate and gave a slow nod, which he returned after some deliberation. “Fine. We’ll do it now.”
Khuzan gave a smile, a grunt, and got up. “Very good! A moment then, if you please,” and he stepped over to a doorway which when opened revealed a stairway to some lower level of the building. Perhaps a cellar? The Dwarf gave a call and from within came the soft pitter-patter of bare feet upon stone as they ascended the steps.
Khuzan stepped aside and beckoned into the main room. It was not the first time either of them had seen a Child of Marath, though this was the first time they'd had the privacy to unreservedly stare. It, or rather, she was a small girl by Child standards, as short as the dwarf actually. And no older than her middle teens perhaps. Her dirty blond hair was only barely kempt and her clothes were simple rough cloth, a beige shirt with snapped draw strings at the collar and a raggedy patchwork brown skirt that stopped just above her ankles. It wouldn’t surprise them if those two items were all she had to call her own, though even that might not be correct, since Children of Marath weren't allowed to own property.
The girl’s breath caught in her throat as her eyes fell on the two faceless and cloaked strangers staring at her from across the room.
The color almost drained from her face as she lowered her gaze and approached obediently.
“See? Quite docile. She shouldn’t be difficult to handle. But then, most aren’t anyway.”
“She’s small,” Hill said matter-of-factly. He'd seen plenty of adult Children before, but never a child Child... Which reminded him that they really needed to come up with a better moniker.
Another laugh rumbled from Khuzan’s belly. “Pardon the irony, but I think it’s rather that your kind are just so tall; elf-sized, as you know.”
They did. It was why they were able to walk around without too much trouble. The human’s they had seen in this world were at least one or two heads shorter than back home, though for what reason that was no one had been able to guess. Perhaps generations of malnourishment and abuse? Perhaps deliberate breeding on their captors’ part. Maybe they'd always been like that. They were called the Children of Marath after all.
“Now, how do you want to do this, sarge?” Hill asked his companion. “Wanna bolt now or wait until nighttime?”
“Oh, I wouldn’t wait until night,” Khuzan cautioned. “Security is lax during the day, but at night it’s much harder to enter or leave the town discreetly. Did your predecessors who’ve come before not tell you that?”
Well, if they had, it hadn’t been emphasized, but perhaps it was just an obvious observation. Of course the guard would be tighter at night when enemies could easily move in close under the cover of nightfall.
“However, if you’re interested, I might have a solution.” A twinkle returned to Khurzan’s dark eyes. “How are you on the water?”
---------------------------------------
Though the dwarf had warned against a nightly venture, that was only in the case they traveled by land. Boat was another matter entirely.
The midnight trip across the lake was so far uneventful. After climbing onto the dwarf’s fishing trawler and getting far enough from shore to climb out of their hiding spots, the four silently waited as the splashing water filled the silence. No lights were lit, and it seemed to Khuzan that the light of the waning moon went out of its way to avoid the two strangers, leaving them in perpetual shadow, unlike the slave girl who he could just make out in the darkness. He attributed it to their cloaks that seemed to absorb every morsel of luminescence.
Greenstills lake was quite large and very deep, though the water was never quite so dark as other similar bodies of water thanks do the iconic stones at its bed. It made night fishing an amusing game of cat and mouse, as a skilled fisherman could find its prey by spying the silhouette of the fish they were chasing. But now, smuggling these creatures, he felt like every shadow might be a trailing mer-soldier. Not that there were any such folk stationed in the village. Still, his heart beat hard in his chest even as he worked to steady his breathing.
“Don’t worry agent Khuzan,” the voice of Hill came from the dark void at the back corner of the boat. “If things go sideways, we’re authorized to protect our intelligence assets.”
Khuzan looked toward the voice with a quirked eyebrow and Hill chuckled.
“That’s you.”
Khuzan ventured a laugh, though he kept it at low volume. “Is that so? That is reassuring. Though I don’t suppose I’d be able to live here anymore if things go… sideways,” he said, repeating the strange turn of phrase.
“Quiet, both of you. Sound carries over water,” Bucannon cautioned with a hiss.
“Not this far out miss,” Khuzan assured as he directed the boat toward the distant shore. “We’re at least thirty minutes out by my reckoning. A few words, softly spoken, won’t reach anyone’s ears but the three of ours.”
But it wasn’t just the three of them, of course. The girl was quietly setting on the floor of the boat, knees drawn up to her chest as she silently stole glances between the three of them when she thought they weren’t looking. Unlike her master, who could be calmed with a few words of assurance, her heart felt like it would burst out of her chest.
After she’d been presented to the two strangers earlier in the day, she’d been largely forgotten amidst high minded conversation that she couldn’t possibly understand. But her master hadn’t dismissed her or given her a task, so she remained in the main room of the building. Not that she wanted to. She’d give anything to escape the hidden looks of the two guests. She felt her throat seize up and her heart skip multiple beats every time their helms turned her direction as if sizing her up.
What terrified her was that even behind their garb, she could tell they were elves. Only elves could be so tall and slender. And that they chose to hide their faces led her to believe they were some sort of evil people; she’d seen many elves walk the city streets in many different kinds of clothes, but never any that completely hid their skin. Didn’t only thieves and murderers hide their faces?
What business did her master have with elves that involved her, if not to perhaps sell her to them? She’d heard enough about the elves’ disdain for the Children of Marath to imagine a hundred foul ends for herself.
And out here on the water where she couldn’t swim… if they decided to throw her over for sport, there was nothing she could do. But though that didn’t make sense to her, since it was no crime to kill a Child of Marath in any nation, why did they come all the way out here? Maybe these were some of those cannibal elves that lived to feast on the meat of the still-living. Maybe she was their next meal.
Every second that passed felt like she was getting closer to some imagined doom.
But in the darkness, at least she could pretend they weren’t looking at her, and could just curl up and try to make herself as invisible to their senses as possible. She spoke no words, moved no muscles and made herself as small as she could. It was all she could do.
“So, Khuzan, what do they pay you?” Hill asked as he climbed up on top of the cabin to peer across the water.
“Oh, this and that,” the dwarf replied with a smile. “Solid gold ingots mostly. I have a smelter friend in another town that I trust who can craft them into spendable renna. Always at the end of the month according to my contribution. Though it seems to me I’m paid fairly, so I suppose I must be performing satisfactorily.”
“Yeah? And how exactly did you end up in our employ?”
“Apparently an acquaintance of mine in another city recommended me as a reliable individual who would be, ah, receptive to working with you.”
“And now, thanks to your repute, you get paid in solid gold. I guess you’re lucky no good deed goes unrewarded.”
Khuzan laughed. “I’ve heard something similar from you fellows before. Except I think it was, ‘no good deed goes unpunished.’ ”
Hill laughed as well. “That's also true.” Bucannon was quiet, her eyes on the horizon.
Time dragged on until the shining lake’s surface was bisected by the darkened shoreline up ahead, and the boat bounced as it gently struck the sandy beach.
“This as far as I go,” Khuzan announced as he left the steering wheel. Hill gave a nod and jumped off the bow, landing with a sandy splash.
Turning this way and that, Khuzan bent down and spoke to the cowering girl. “Listen carefully, Child,” he began, making sure that in the darkness her focus was on him. “You now belong to these two. You will go with them, understand?”
She gave a firm nod, stood up and tried to look like a good slave in front of the figures in black.
“Thanks for the lift, agent Khuzan.” Bucannon extended a hand, which he took with a smile.
“Safe and profitable travels, friends,” he replied. As the sergeant turned to leave the boat, the dwarf stopped her. “Oh, one more thing…” He bent down and opened a water-sealed compartment on the side of the boat and withdrew a series of papers and handed them to her.
Bucannon held them out against the pale moonlight and leafed through them. “A breed registry?”
Khuzan nodded. “She’s now officially your property. What you do with her is your business, but if anyone came across you and challenged your ownership of her, you would need these papers. If you can’t prove ownership, there’s a reclamation reward for finding stolen or escaped Children.”
“What if they’re free?” Hill asked, propping his chin over the side of the boat.
Khuzan blinked, silent for several seconds before laughing louder than he intended. “Oh dear, agent Hill. You should know by now as well as I do. There’s no such thing as a free Child of Marath. And if there were, don't trust the salesman!”
“Yeah, I guess so.” Hill snorted derisively and agreed, reaching over the railing to shake the dwarfs hand as well. With a lift, Bucannon hoisted the girl over the edge and deposited her into Hill’s arms as he took her to the dry shore. With a final farewell, the two gave the vessel a great shove and pushed it back out into the water, where the dwarf sped off to get back to town before dawn.
Bucannon handed Hill the documents which he leafed through before placing inside his satchel bag alongside the dwarf’s dossier. As he withdrew his hand, he brought out a black hood and a pair of bindings. He approached the slave girl and she stiffened. “For the remainder of this trip, I’m going to put these on you. Obey, and you’ll be done no harm. Understand?”
She gave a fervent nod, not because she was so willing to comply but because she didn’t want to be punished for sounding hesitant. Her hands trembled as he bound her wrists with a long cord that ran back to his waist. That done, he fit the hood over her head, and the dark of the night was blackened absolutely. Then with a sudden surprising movement, she felt her legs spread, her body lifted up, and her hands slipped over the hood of the male’s head as she was placed upon his back.
Bucannon pressed a spot on her helm and a glowing sigil flickered and disappeared. “You don’t have to be so grim, you know,” she told her partner, now speaking without the use of the translation mark. “You could just tell her the truth.”
Hill pressed the same sigil on his helm and shook his head. “Home first. As long as she cooperates until then, she can have all the truth she can stomach.”
He was right, of course; it was convenient to act the harsh master now to keep her from doing anything foolish. That didn't mean she had to like the taste it left in her mouth.
"Fine. Let’s go.” She pressed the other side of her helm and another sigil flickered, “This is Gamma team. We’ve passed checkpoint Hotel. Moving to extraction.”
submitted by Black_Lister to HFY [link] [comments]


2020.09.19 09:47 hughmcf [EVENT] Australian Voices

Much has been made of Australia’s return to the strategic fore in the Indo-Pacific, with Canberra pledging billions of dollars in fresh defence spending and regional economic investment. Yet as decisive as this newfound strategic resolve may appear, it will mean nothing if Australia’s partners in the Indo-Pacific are not meaningfully engaged at the same time. To that end, after years of budgetary cuts and inadequate attention, the Federal Government has at long last committed to a restoration of Australia’s media footprint in the Pacific region. Speaking to the press this afternoon, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced the creation of the ‘Pacific Voice’ network, in addition to significant reforms to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS).

Pacific Voice:

Fixing past mistakes:
In 2017, ABC decision makers made a fatal error when they triggered sweeping cuts to Radio Australia (RA), a Pacific-focused radio station run by the public broadcaster since the early 20th century. This brought an end to all shortwave radio transmissions outside of Australia and Fiji and was accompanied by a general reduction in the amount of content produced by RA. In one felled swoop, Australia had cleanly decapitated almost all of its soft power media capabilities in a region of critical strategic concern. A perfect own goal.
Seeking to reverse this error, the Federal Government has announced that Radio Australia will undergo two major changes. The first will see a return to shortwave radio transmissions in those areas of regional Australia which also relied on RA broadcasting (affected residents included cattle station owners, Indigenous ranger groups and fishermen). The second change, meanwhile, will see $30 million in funding pledged to RA’s Pacific broadcasting, with all Pacific-focused broadcasting being bundled into the new ‘Pacific Voice’ network.
Radio for all:
Under this new operating framework, with the permission of local regulators, Pacific Voice will resume RA shortwave transmissions in Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Nauru, Vanuatu, Tuvalu, Kiribati, Tonga, Samoa, New Caledonia, the New Zealand Pacific territories (Niue, Tokelau the Cook Islands and even New Zealand itself if Wellington approves), the Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Timor-Leste. As was previously the case, these transmissions will be made in English, French and Tok Pisin (PNG), with Portuguese also being offered in Timor-Leste. All foreign language broadcasting shall be produced with the assistance of SBS staff.
Beyond the radio set:
In addition to resumed shortwave radio transmissions, Pacific Voice will also leverage its new funding to increase its television-specific and digital media content. This is expected to include a large amount of social media content for consumption on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube and Snapchat. While most of this content will be produced in the organisation’s Australian offices, content will also be produced from the ABC’s PNG, New Zealand and Fiji offices, with additional offices set to be established in New Caledonia and Kiribati (with local permission). Naturally this effort will collectively demand a much larger personnel pool, and so Pacific Voice will aim to increase the size of its staff by 40% by 2025.

Domestic public broadcasting reforms:

ABC 用普通话!
While serious dilemmas face Australia’s public broadcasters abroad, the domestic situation also remains far from ideal. As an example, due to the unjustified expulsion of ABC correspondent, Bill Birtles, and Australian Financial Review correspondent, Mike Smith, from Beijing, Australia is left without a single mainstream media journalist in China.
But while Australia is without a single correspondent in China, Beijing maintains a large mainstream media apparatus in Australia, using broadcasters such as the CGTN to build a propaganda machine around the nation’s sizable Chinese-Australian community. Although there have been isolated calls from senior cabinet members to restrict or even expel “foreign journalists” working for networks such as CGTN, Prime Minister Scott Morrison has instead opted to openly compete with Beijing-sponsored media groups working in Australia, pledging $10 million towards the establishment of a Mandarin language wing within the ABC. Known in English as ‘Australian Heart’ (澳大利亚心脏), the wing will not only work to translate existing ABC content into Mandarin, but also to produce original Mandarin language content as a means of providing a more balanced and informative broadcasting stream as compared to Beijing-sponsored content. Speaking to the press, Prime Minister Morrison struck a defiant tone: “Australia will not race Beijing to the gutter on press freedom. We will not expel Chinese journalists from our country. That’s not the Australian way. The Australian way is to compete fairly and to be honest. This new language wing represents a fair go for Mandarin-speaking Australians, who deserve honest and fair media coverage as much as any other group of Australians.”
Quiet SBS reforms:
Finally, with the media fixated on reforms to the ABC and RA, foreign language broadcaster SBS will quietly make reforms to its Cantonese and Mandarin media content. As reported in Clive Hamilton’s 2018 book, ‘Silent Invasion’, state-controlled Chinese broadcasters play a significant role in producing the SBS’ Chinese language content, with many stories often being written in Beijing before being sent to the SBS for public release, and state journalists dispatched from Beijing maintaining an all-hours presence at Chinese language radio broadcasting sites. Under its new operating framework, however, the SBS will dismiss all state journalists from its broadcasting sites and will henceforth produce all its Chinese language content independently. Though these changes will be conducted quietly, they will have the effect of ejecting the Chinese Government from the SBS’ Chinese language media creation process, restoring journalistic integrity to the broadcaster after years of undue state influence.
submitted by hughmcf to GlobalPowers [link] [comments]


2020.09.19 09:12 Berabouman 38 [M4R] Singapore/Anywhere - Looking to explore possible connections

Hello all! I hope you all are having an absolutely wonderful day.

38 year old Chinese male here. Polyamory is not well known in this part of the world so I am casting my net farther afield. Looking for connections as stated above - don't want to put too much pressure on anyone so let's talk and see where it may lead? Open to joining existing couples/triads/quads. I have been poly for over 2 decades, so it's definitely not new to me and I have been part of a triad before.

I identify as hetero leaning bisexual. Interests include video games, anime, singing, and writing. I'm somewhere between working/studying/self-improvement at the minute. I enjoy meeting new people, talking about nearly everything, and learning more! Not necessarily in that order.

I am a hopeless (well, hopeful, I'm posting here aren't I?) romantic and have always been happier partnered rather than single. Being in love is the best feeling in the world! :) Video games perhaps coming a close second.

Other random facts : I speak 3 languages and have at various times been a singer, copywriter, teacher, translator and writer.

Given that Reddit is usually Westerners I'm open to online connections of course!

That's about it for now. I hope to hear from you.
submitted by Berabouman to polyamoryR4R [link] [comments]


2020.09.18 16:43 ARedHarvest Baltimore Sales and Special Round up Sept. 18 to Sept. 20

Hey folks!
Not shopping as much so this will be briefer than previous editions. If folks have things to share feel free to in the comments and I'll update the post.
Rather than just publish a post every time a sale pops up, I thought I would do a round-up of specials heading into the weekend/week. If folks noticed anything I missed, feel free to add it.
If possible, I'll try and update this list as things arrive, but feel free to post things as you see them over the next few days. If you're the last one to find an item on the shelf, post and let folks know it's sold out.
Heads up:
Events:
Tastings
Sales
Notable Releases
Other spirits
submitted by ARedHarvest to BmoreBourbonSociety [link] [comments]


2020.09.18 12:04 pearformancecoach Getting into Trance for Flow

Getting into Trance for Flow
https://preview.redd.it/cfvqbqp5rvn51.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f962604cb0baff697ae83cb3247f24629e5c32c3
Simply follow the following directions:
Make yourself comfortable either sitting or standing and focus on one small area out in front of you. Pick a spot that is above eye level. Maybe this is a small section on a wall or a tree outside, whatever you choose make sure it doesn’t move. Focus in on this one area, finding new detailed information the longer look. Keep your eyes on this one spot, staying fox all the time gaining as much information as used on the small detail you can see. Over a couple of minutes allow you vision to become very tunnelled as you go smaller and smaller, slowly becoming more and more aware of the detail in this small single point. When you have been transfixed on this one area for a couple of minutes, whilst keeping your eyes transfixed on this one spot, allow your periphery vision to widen. Start to see what is to the left and right of the spot you are staring on and keep widening you periphery vision until you can see the floor in front of you.
This is essentially what happens during our performances when we are focused on the task at hand whether that is looking at a tennis ball or our partners arm as we perform a complex dance move. We maintains fixed focus point, yet our periphery pick sup all the detail the body needs to know to do what it is doing. In examples see on the ball of playing tennis, whilst the focal point is focused on the ball, the periphery is taking in vital information such as how far away the net is, where the opponent is moving, where the line we are aiming for is positioned, and so on. The subconscious is busy digesting and adapting to this new information, so we can make the best shot available to us.
As take in the new visual information in your periphery, start to become aware of your other senses. Maybe, you can feel the wind against your face, the clothes against your skin, or the ground beneath your feet or bottom. Maybe you can hear noises around you both close and far aware. Allow all your senses to become heightened as you become fully connected to the moment. Turn up the senses like you turn up the volume button on a remote control. Become fully engaged as you experience the now, just as it is. Stay in this space for as long as you can, raining your mind to stay connected to the moment experiencing it without the grip of the conscious mind.
You may start to notice thoughts come in and out of your otherwise clear mind. When they do simply acknowledge them and let the flow out, as you would a leaf that floats past you in the wind. Simply be aware of them, and let the leave as quick as it came. Simply focus on connecting your senses to the moment. See if you can feel what is happening behind you, to the sides of you, below you and above you. Allow you presence to be all around you, almost as if I it exists outside of your body.
The above practice normally elicits a slight state of trance, a light state of hypnosis, our gateway to flow. The more we practice getting in and out of these states, the more we become aware of trance states already existing in our day to day lives. These trance states are very similar to the light trance states we experience when driving a car on auto pilot, or loosing time when we are engulfed in surfing the internet. We are doing what may seem a simple task without the conscious interference of stress, fear or other conscious thoughts. We do these task without ego and self image, we simply do them just as we breath, or pump blood round our body. Trance, like flow, has no identification with the ego, it does not dwell in the realm of the conscious mind, it simply exists and functions effortlessly and incredible efficiently, just as we want all our performances to be.
For more info please get in touch or purchase our book on flow.
Tags: Cameron Norsworthy , Peak Performance Coach , Speaker Peak Performance
submitted by pearformancecoach to u/pearformancecoach [link] [comments]


2020.09.18 10:55 HoldHerHand_4EVR The Love Bank: Negative Interactions

Previous posts have dealt with concepts, such as The Love Bank, Positive Interactions, and SPending Your Best Times Together.
Recall that the Golden Ratio is 5 positive interactions to 1 negative interactions. Or, it will take at least 5 positive interactions to make up for every negative interaction.
If you are here reading this, you probably aren't an expert at avoiding those negative interactions, whether wayward or betrayed. One thing that is helpful is figuring out what exactly those interactions may be.
The Gottman Institute largely focuses on what they call "The Four Horseman;"
The Four Horseman Animated Video
  1. Criticism
The first horseman is criticism. Criticizing your partner is different than offering a critique or voicing a complaint. The latter two are about specific issues, whereas the former is an ad hominem attack. It is an attack on your partner at the core of their character. In effect, you are dismantling their whole being when you criticize.
The important thing is to learn the difference between expressing a complaint and criticizing:
Complaint: “I was scared when you were running late and didn’t call me. I thought we had agreed that we would do that for each other.”
Criticism: “You never think about how your behavior is affecting other people. I don’t believe you are that forgetful, you’re just selfish. You never think of others! You never think of me!”
If you find that you and your partner are critical of each other, don’t assume your relationship is doomed to fail. The problem with criticism is that, when it becomes pervasive, it paves the way for the other, far deadlier horsemen to follow. It makes the victim feel assaulted, rejected, and hurt, and often causes the perpetrator and victim to fall into an escalating pattern where the first horseman reappears with greater and greater frequency and intensity, which eventually leads to contempt.
  1. Contempt
The second horseman is contempt. When we communicate in this state, we are truly mean—we treat others with disrespect, mock them with sarcasm, ridicule, call them names, and mimic or use body language such as eye-rolling or scoffing. The target of contempt is made to feel despised and worthless.
Contempt goes far beyond criticism. While criticism attacks your partner’s character, contempt assumes a position of moral superiority over them:
“You’re ‘tired?’ Cry me a river. I’ve been with the kids all day, running around like mad to keep this house going and all you do when you come home from work is flop down on that sofa like a child and play those idiotic video games. I don’t have time to deal with another kid. Could you be any more pathetic?”
Research even shows that couples that are contemptuous of each other are more likely to suffer from infectious illness (colds, the flu, etc.) than others due to weakened immune systems! Contempt is fueled by long-simmering negative thoughts about the partner—which come to a head when the perpetrator attacks the accused from a position of relative superiority.
Most importantly, contempt is the single greatest predictor of divorce. It must be eliminated.
  1. Defensiveness
The third horseman is defensiveness, and it is typically a response to criticism. We’ve all been defensive, and this horseman is nearly omnipresent when relationships are on the rocks. When we feel unjustly accused, we fish for excuses and play the innocent victim so that our partner will back off.
Unfortunately, this strategy is almost never successful. Our excuses just tell our partner that we don’t take their concerns seriously and that we won’t take responsibility for our mistakes:
Question: “Did you call Betty and Ralph to let them know that we’re not coming tonight as you promised this morning?”
Defensive response: “I was just too darn busy today. As a matter of fact, you know just how busy my schedule was. Why didn’t you just do it?”
This partner not only responds defensively, but they reverse blame in an attempt to make it the other partner’s fault. Instead, a non-defensive response can express acceptance of responsibility, admission of fault, and understanding of your partner’s perspective:
“Oops, I forgot. I should have asked you this morning to do it because I knew my day would be packed. That’s my fault. Let me call them right now.”
Although it is perfectly understandable to defend yourself if you’re stressed out and feeling attacked, this approach will not have the desired effect. Defensiveness will only escalate the conflict if the critical spouse does not back down or apologize. This is because defensiveness is really a way of blaming your partner, and it won’t allow for healthy conflict management.
  1. Stonewalling
The fourth horseman is stonewalling, which is usually a response to contempt. Stonewalling occurs when the listener withdraws from the interaction, shuts down, and simply stops responding to their partner. Rather than confronting the issues with their partner, people who stonewall can make evasive maneuvers such as tuning out, turning away, acting busy, or engaging in obsessive or distracting behaviors.
It takes time for the negativity created by the first three horsemen to become overwhelming enough that stonewalling becomes an understandable “out,” but when it does, it frequently becomes a bad habit. And unfortunately, stonewalling isn’t easy to stop. It is a result of feeling physiologically flooded, and when we stonewall, we may not even be in a physiological state where we can discuss things rationally.
If you feel like you’re stonewalling during a conflict, stop the discussion and ask your partner to take a break:
“Alright, I’m feeling too angry to keep talking about this. Can we please take a break and come back to it in a bit? It’ll be easier to work through this after I’ve calmed down.”
Then take 20 minutes to do something alone that soothes you—read a book or magazine, take a walk, go for a run, really, just do anything that helps to stop feeling flooded—and then return to the conversation once you feel ready.
The Four Horseman: Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, and Stonewalling
In the article, each section has hyperlinks for deeper dives into each subject.
The Marriage Builders program refers to negative interactions as "Love Busters."
I call all the ways that spouses are inconsiderate of each other's feelings Love Busters because that what they do — they destroy the love that a husband and wife have for each other.
I've found that the most common Love Busters in marriage fall into six categories: Selfish Demands, Disrespectful Judgments, Angry Outbursts, Dishonesty, Independent Behavior and Annoying Habits.
The first three of these Love Busters are instinctive, yet thoughtless, ways to try to get what you want from each other. When a request doesn't work, a spouse will often revert to a demand ("I don't care how you feel — do it or else!"). If that doesn't get the job done, a spouse will try disrespectful judgments ("If you had any sense, and were not so lazy and selfish, you would do it"). And then, when all of that fails, an angry outburst often represents the last ditch effort ("I'll see to it that you regret not having done it").
Of course, demands, disrespect and anger don't really get the job done. You generally don't do things for your spouse because of these Love Busters, you do them out of care and consideration. If your spouse is demanding, disrespectful and angry, you tend to be less caring and considerate, leading you to do less for your spouse. Instead of giving your spouse what he or she needs, demands, disrespect and anger cause you to resist. I want you to have what you need in your marriage, but demands, disrespect and anger will not get it for you. They will prevent you from having what you want if you revert to these destructive instincts.
But when you indulge in these three Love Busters, you do more than fail to get what you need — you also destroy the love your spouse has for you. All of these instincts, and the habits they help create, cause your spouse to be unhappy, and that causes Love Bank withdrawals.
The fourth Love Buster, Dishonesty, causes massive Love Bank withdrawals whenever it's discovered. And spouses usually discover each other's dishonesty because of their emotional closeness to each other. If you or your spouse have a tendency to lie or distort the truth, chase that bad habit out of your marriage before it ruins everything.
The fifth Love Buster is Independent Behavior, the conduct of one spouse that ignores the feelings and interests of the other spouse. If your decisions are made as if your spouse doesn't even exist, you will find yourself running roughshod over your spouse's feelings and your Love Bank account. Since it's usually scheduled and requires some thought to execute, the simplest way to overcome it is to take it off your schedule. And if you follow the Policy of Joint Agreement, Independent Behavior will never find itself on your schedule in the first place.
Finally, the sixth Love Buster, Annoying Habits, is behavior that is repeated without much thought that bothers your spouse. Marriage is a partnership of incredibly close quarters, where just about anything you or your spouse does is almost sure to affect the other. If you want to stay in love with each other, your habits, even the innocent ones, should make Love Bank deposits, not withdrawals.
Love Busters
In the right sidebar to the article, there are articles diving deeper into each Love Buster.
Also, linked in the article is a communication tool:
The Love Busters Questionnaire
This gives you a way to lay out which behaviors are the most bothersome to each other, and thus what you can target for elimination.
It is far easier to eliminate negative interactions than it is to "make up" for them with 5 additional positive interactions.
Hack the ratio; eliminate your bad relationship habits.
submitted by HoldHerHand_4EVR to AsOneAfterInfidelity [link] [comments]


2020.09.18 03:36 pgmcnerney A Treatise On Spin Overheads

Per JT-1978 request!
Spin overheads, my favorite topic!
My first piece of advice would be to focus on your push and waterfall overheads first. These shots will make up the majority of your arsenal and you will hit 100+ of these a match as opposed to ~10 spinner.
Boring disclaimer out of the way. Now completely clear your brain of any spin you may hit on a serve or overhead in tennis. The only exception is that a kick serve to the ad-side is still a very effective serve in paddle.
This video of the former National Champions Brian Uihlein and Dave Keevins was very helpful to me when learning how to hit spin.
Most important takeaways in order:
1) Getting the right lob - Someone asked the other day why it is easiest to pick on the ad player for right-handers. The reason is two-part. The boring part is that generally people's backhands are weaker than their forehands. It is very difficult to attack people in the middle of the court. Only a few players are capable of generating enough spin to hurt their opponents there. The much easier way is to use the nick/side screen or a short cut. The deuce player's forehand stands between you and the nick/side screen. The ad player has to make a major shift to get in that position, unless they are backhand dominant like a Parsons. The second part is that for right handed players it is much easier to generate spin on a lob where the ball is coming from right to left. The reason is because almost all spin in paddle is generated by hitting on the outside of the ball. It is very rare for a player to spin the ball hitting on the inside. Juan Arraya's cut backhand is one of the few shots hit from the inside, though he can hit it on any side he chooses. So if I want to hit on the outside of the ball, then I want the ball coming across my body from right to left. My perfect lob is medium height, short, and coming from the ad side screen diagonally towards the middle of the court. This angle then allows me swing across the ball aggressively. I can hit that lob short to the deuce, deep to both the deuce and ad, and if I have enough court back into the ad side screen. (Assuming my partner is kind enough to vacate his space and give me plenty of room to swing!)
2) Grip - If you do not have the proper grip it will be very difficult to generate a large amount of effective spin. Look at the grip Uihlein demonstrates in this video at 7:15 and try and copy it. If anything it is most similar to a semi-western one-handed backhand grip. Much more severe than your typical continental grip. The biggest downside with this grip is that it is very difficult to volley with this grip. Most important rule of paddle: Think about not losing a point before you think about winning it. So, that means it is very likely that you will have to switch grips on your volleys and overheads. I accomplish this by deciding based off of my previous overhead what shot my opponent will play next. So, if I sense a drive coming I will always wait in my continental grip. If I anticipate that I will get the right lob, like I mentioned earlier, then I will shift to my more aggressive grip. I actually hit my push overheads and waterfall overheads with a continental grip. So that means I am changing my grip back and forth on almost every single shot. This can be difficult for some people, so I will again reiterate that your primary goal is not to put yourself at a disadvantage on the next shot.
3) Swing Path - This is the weirdest part for a tennis player to get. The goal for a good spin overhead is to get the ball moving from side to side, not high to low. You want the ball to hit the court or screen and move violently the side. To accomplish this, you do not want to swing down on the ball like you would a slice serve or overhead. You actually want to have a very flat or horizontal swing path. (I would recommend not trying to spin the ball like Uihlein in the video I linked. Those spins he hits are incredibly difficult to hit and you have to hit the ball incredibly precisely with an incredibly aggressive swing to get the ball to drop down off the screen like he demonstrates. It is also not as effective at the top level anymore because of how great everyone has become at reading and reacting to spin in the backcourt) Keevins has the exact swing path that I would copy. Notice where his paddle finishes on the overhead he hits at 4:11, it is almost by his shoulder! This is because he his not swinging down on the ball, he is swinging across it. He can make that exact same swing and go short or deep. For the deep one he just lengthens the swing out towards his opponents. For the short one he keeps his paddle cocked higher and finishes much closer to his body with a shorter swing.
4) Body Position - A few keys here that Keevins highlights excellently in the video. First, a large shoulder turn is beneficial to generating more spin. Just like on a golf shot or a baseball swing. Now, it does require some flexibility and additionally the more that you turn the more can go wrong. You have to fire your hips and shoulder it sync and uncork aggressively into the ball. I would not recommend turning your back entirely to the net like Keevins does. I would recommend having your feet at a 45 degree angle and your front foot, left, pointed towards the ad side nick. It is important that you get in this shoulder turned position as the lob is being played. You will not have enough time to go from a neutral ready position into this position if you only decide to attempt a spin overhead after the lob as been hit. (Anticipation instead of reaction is one of the biggest factors that separates the club and tournament level players. Know what shot you want to hit before your opponent strikes the ball. If you are reacting to their shot selection it is too late and you are now much more likely to make an error.) Also, it helps to have a wide base here. The best spin shots occur when you shift your weight from your back to front foot aggressively just before you swing. Remember how we spoke about a flat swing path earlier? Well, the other reason a wide base is important is because you want to contact the ball as low to the ground as possible and out in front of your to enable that flat swing. You want to think of the swing like throwing a Frisbee back-handed. You are not going to be able to create that flow and long swing if you are contacting the ball too far above or behind your head. You need to contact the ball out in front with a nice straight arm.
The best example of each of these techniques can be seen watching the GOAT Johan du Randt. In this video watch how he: 1) turns his shoulder towards the ad screen, 2) Actually hops into the ball to get his weight moving forward, 3) creates a wide base with a deep knee bend to contact the ball at shoulder height and sent it deep and low. There are also some wicked overheads at 36:18 and 44:30.
5) Point of Contact - We mentioned earlier all the overheads we are hitting are side spin on the outside of the ball. That means we are hitting between 4 and 5:30 on the ball depending on the time of spin overhead we are hitting. This is tricky to explain, but I will try. A ball is round and a clock is flat. So 5:30 on the ball can actually refer to more than one point. To generate more side spin you want to hit as much on the side of the ball as possible. Not on the back. The violent side to side spin is generated by hitting very very fast on a tiny sliver of the side of the ball. The more of the ball you hit, the less violent the spin will be.
6) Different Shots - I think all aggressive spin overheads in paddle can be broken down into 2 shots: A deep slash and a short kill.
Deep Slash: - I have touched on the deep slash for most of this post and most of the advice I have given is applicable to this swing. The deep slash can be hit to both the Ad and deuce side. It can be hit to the back screen or to the ad side screen. When going to the back screen you want to aim the ball at your opponent's body. The goal is to force them to step out of the way and then chase it down as it kicks horizontally off the back screen. The overhead I linked in the Johan video above is a great example of the deuce version. You can hit that same overhead at the ad player's body as well. The ad side screen overhead is a little bit of fool's gold. Here is an example of Johan hitting this overhead in the same match. Amazing dig by Fraser btw. Resist the temptation to 'kick' this ball. Remember it is side spin you are going for here, not top spin. The problem with this overhead is that if you hit the back screen first instead of the side screen, the ball will come far off side screen and set your opponent up in a very advantageous position. Very easy shot to punish if misplaced.
Short Kill: If I am hitting the short kill shot, I will hit at 5:30 on the ball because I want to actually hit the ball slightly underneath and for it to come slightly up off my paddle with a ton of side spin. The short kill is the most effective shot in paddle, because if you hit it perfectly it is nonreturnable. Here is an example of yours truly hitting a nice little walk-away. Don't miss this shot in the net. The goal is to get the ball to move sideways off the deck. Try and feel like you are curving around the outside of the ball and finish with your palm facing the deuce side screen at your left shoulder. Really exaggerate the around motion.
7) Don't be afraid to miss! These shots take a lot of practice and you're going to miss a lot in the beginning. When you are just getting started don't aim for the lines. Safe target, check to make sure partner is not in danger zone and swing hard!
submitted by pgmcnerney to PlatformTennis [link] [comments]


2020.09.17 18:32 TheTipOff “Clippers Gonna Clip” — Can This Clippers Team Win an NBA Title?

This is a long read (about 12mins). There is a verdict (TLDR) at the bottom, but it'd be best if you could read the whole thing. Thank you.

How did this happen?

This was not supposed to happen. The Los Angeles Clippers (by their expectations and quite frankly, most of the NBA’s expectations) should be gearing up for an all Los Angeles duel with their “hallway” rival Lakers on Saturday. Instead, they find themselves on the next flight out of the bubble and watching the team that knocked them out, the Denver Nuggets, take their place. Speaking of those Nuggets, it is important to state that for as much as the Clippers blatantly choked their 3–1 series lead, all credit should be given to the Nuggets for not giving up and continuing to fight.
The Clippers just a year ago were considered “over performers”. They were the 8th seed in the West, and took the defending champion Golden State Warriors to six games, a series that featured a 31 point second half Clipper comeback in Oracle. At the same time, Kawhi Leonard put the city of Toronto on his back and carried them to their first NBA title. It seemed like a match made in heaven when Kawhi Leonard signed with them in free agency that summer. However, Leonard said he would only come to the Clippers if another star were to join him, so the Clippers sent a massive package to the Thunder (which included 3 first round picks, 3 pick swaps, promising guard Shai-Gilgeous Alexander and veteran forward Danilo Gallinari) in exchange for Paul George. Though it seemed like a very hefty price, the common notion at the time was that it was worth it for the Clippers. Without George, Leonard would not sign for them (and could have potentially signed with the Lakers) so they were effectively trading for both players. On top of that, the Clippers were receiving the reigning Finals MVP and Paul George, who had just finished third in regular season MVP voting. Things seemed to be trending up for the Clippers, they now had two superstars who could close out games alongside a promising core group of players and an excellent head coach in Doc Rivers.
Fast forward over a year later, and Kawhi Leonard and Paul George combined for 0 fourth quarter points in a Game 7. They shot a combined 10 for 38 from the field and attempted 1 free throw between them for 24 total points. The Clippers as a whole did not register a single field goal in the fourth quarter until the 4:54 mark (at that point they were already down 15). At the start of the fourth quarter, the Nuggets held an 82–74 lead. Jokic started that quarter on the bench with 4 fouls and Kawhi Leonard and Paul George were both on the floor. To most NBA fans, this would have been the point where the Clippers should have imposed their will and made a run. Instead, Jokic checks back into the game with 7:27 left and the Clippers were outscored 7–2 and the Nuggets lead by 15. Paul George and Kawhi Leonard were brought to Los Angeles to help get out of situations just like this, yet they both seem to do more harm than good on the court (they were a combined -41 in the box score). This Clippers performance vs Denver will undoubtedly go down as one of the most embarrassing performances and biggest collapses in NBA playoff history. The Clippers could not have been more lifeless and seemingly uninterested in the court than what they put out there in Game 7.

Who is to blame?

It is tough to signal out just one person to blame for such an awful collapse, because there were so many minor mistakes that Denver just exploited in this series.
The Coaching Staff: Doc Rivers
On one hand, the coaching staff has to shoulder a large portion of the blame. Doc Rivers is the face of the Clippers coaching staff, and it was clear he made little to no adjustments throughout the series to try and slow the Nuggets down. And this was okay through the first 4 games, the Clippers were up 3–1 and looked comfortable. But after seeing your team get killed on bad rotations and poor communication, surely it must have crossed Doc’s mind to stop double teaming Jokic and just let him beat you, but refuse to let the other players get involved. A lot of the Clipper rotations were very poor and it looked like the players had no idea where to go on some of them.
Jokic destroying Clippers defense
On this double team, Kawhi Leonard does a good job tracking the cut of Jerami Grant. But for some reason he just switches off and goes towards Gary Harris, leaving Grant wide open for the dump off pass. He could have been trying to read Jokic’s pass, as he does like to skip it to an open shooter, or he could have been expecting Zubac to slide up and tag Grant (though Zubac correctly was still on his man Milsap). Neither of this happens and Kawhi Leonard just leaves a guy wide open next to the basket. This surely had to have been a coaching adjustment because Kawhi Leonard is too good of a defensive player (he has two Defensive Player of the Year trophies) to make a mistake like that. However, if Kawhi Leonard is to blame for something like this, it would not seem surprising considering how poor he was all night.
The Big Guns: Kawhi Leonard and Paul George
As aforementioned, Kawhi Leonard and Paul George were nowhere near their normal selves in Game 7. However, with that being said, both of them did end up averaging close to what it is expected of them through the first six games. Leonard averaged 24.3 points, 8.6 rebounds, and 5.9 assists on 44% while Paul George averaged 21.7 points, 5.4 rebounds, and 3.6 assists on 43% shooting. But at the same time, if the Clippers stood any chance of keeping pace with the Nuggets superstars (Jamal Murray and Nikola Jokic), they were going to need some bigger performances from their stars, especially in Game 7. Jamal Murray alone almost outscored the whole Clippers starting lineup, 48 to 40. Those two along with the rest of the Clippers just continued to miss open shot after open shot, and the Nuggets continued to put on offensive pressure until eventually, the Clippers folded.
An ideology: Load Management
Right after the Clippers lost Game 7, Marc Spears of ESPN broke the story that Doc Rivers was “never comfortable” and that “conditioning wise, we had no guys who could play minutes”. This brings into question the “load management” tactic the Clippers employed throughout the season and whether or not it impacted the performance of the team (most notably Kawhi Leonard).
Clippers fatigue excuse
Of course, this could all just be an excuse made up by the Clippers to try and justify such a momentous choke job, but it is still intriguing to look into. From the very first game of the season, it was clear the Clippers would employ the same tactic the Raptors used in order to keep Kawhi Leonard fit throughout the year; load management. When the Toronto Raptors signed Kawhi in the summer of 2018, it was documented that he had a chronic tendinopathy injury that causes him discomfort and pain from time to time. Because of this, he rested 22 games in the regular season and did not play in back to backs, so that the Raptors could preserve him to the playoffs. And it worked, Kawhi won Finals MVP while the Raptors won their first title.
Kawhi Leonard this year did not play in any back to backs and only played in 57 of a possible 72 games. However, if what Doc Rivers is saying is true, evidently the load management strategy did not work for them if Kawhi was gassed in the fourth quarter. On top of this, the Clippers only load managed Kawhi Leonard, so it seems inexcusable for a whole professional basketball team to be that tired in the most critical game of the season. Especially when you consider every single game is being played in the same location and there is no travel time.
Though the Clippers didn’t explicitly load manage Paul George, they were very cautious with his game time throughout the season. This makes sense, however, because he missed the first 11 games of the year recovering a rotator cuff injury, as well as missing a period in January due to a hamstring injury. In that regard, it does make sense that George would only feature in 48 games in the regular season and play just 29.6 minutes per game. However, considering that these players had essentially a 4 month break in the middle of the season where they could have kept up their conditioning (though no conditioning can fully mimic game like speed), it seems unfathomable to think how the Clippers could be so gassed. On top of this, the Nuggets already had played in a Game 7 in the series prior, and they seemed more than capable of handling the heavy minutes down the stretch. In this case, load management has not seemed to have served its purpose, but rather exasperate the problem. But it does beg the question of how much worse it could have been for the Clippers if they did not load manage at all. For now, it is impossible to tell.

Where do the Clippers go from here?

There’s no denying the talent on this Clippers roster. They could very well run it back with the same core group of guys and give it another swing. If what Paul George said in his press conference was true, and that the Clippers need more time to gel, maybe another year with the same guys is what they need to challenge for a title.
Clippers payroll from 2019-2024
Looking at their salary sheet, the only notable free agents on their roster are Marcus Morris, Montrezl Harrell, and Reggie Jackson. Both Morris and Jackson in theory would be relatively easy to bring back on similar 1 year deals, or in a worse case scenario, easy to replace. There is a surplus of shooting bigs in the NBA now that could easily take Morris’ minutes. In fact, the Clippers have a similar player already on their roster in JaMychal Green. With Reggie Jackson, if his asking price becomes too high, this could be an opportunity for young guards Amir Coffey and Terance Mann to take those minutes and develop.
The one true potential issue may come with Montrezl Harrell. The current Sixth Man of the Year would most likely be looking for a pay increase from the 6 million dollar contract he is currently on and considering the Clippers have the fourth highest payroll in the NBA and are almost 20 million over the salary cap, they may not be willing to pay Harrell as much as he wants. On top of all this, if the Denver series proved anything about the Clippers, it is that their bigs are not up to championship level standard; especially on the defensive end. This is especially concerning considering all the talented bigs in the Western Conference (namely Nikola Jokic and Anthony Davis).
It seems more likely than not the Clippers will resign Harrell to a bigger contract rather than moving on from him. The Clippers are in win now mode, so taking a hit into the luxury tax may not be that much of an issue for owner Steve Balmer, if it can net them a championship. However, an interesting option to explore is if the Clippers sign and trade Harrell for a different big.
Potential Clippers trade for Steven Adams
In this hypothetical scenario, the Clippers package Harrell with Landry Shamet to the Thunder in exchange for a more defensively sound center in Steven Adams. There is no denying the offense impact Montrezl Harrell has on the court but he may not be the best fit in this Clippers team that lacks a true defensive center. Ivica Zubac has the potential to be that center but if the Clippers want to challenge now, they’re going to need more than just the potential to compete, they’re going to need already developed players. From the Thunder’s perspective, they get another young shooter in Shamet and more frontcourt offense in the form of Harrell.
Potential Clippers trade for with Mavericks
Another hypothetical scenario would be the Dallas Mavericks. The Clippers would end up getting a more athletic center in Dwight Powell (though he is recovering from a long term injury right now) as well as a potential Reggie Jackson replacement in backup point guard Delon Wright, on probably a cheaper deal than what Jackson would ask for. Wright is someone who can create his own shot from time to time, something the Clippers really need whenever Leonard and George cannot get themselves going (ala Game 7 vs Denver). From Dallas’ side, they get a potential frontcourt partner to Kristaps Porzingis who could also work really well in the pick and roll with Luka Doncic, considering Harrell’s success in the pick and roll with Lou Williams the past couple seasons.
It seems more likely than not the Clippers run it back with the same group, as there is a lot of untapped potential with them that could propel them further into the playoffs. Another question people have been asking since the loss is whether or not to fire Doc Rivers. It would seem quite preemptive to fire such a decorated coach, especially one who has been with the team for so long. On top of that, if Rivers was one of the main reasons why Kawhi Leonard decided to sign there, it would seem silly to upset him, especially when he and Paul George can both opt out of their contracts at the end of next season. For now, it would be safe to assume Doc Rivers’ job is relatively safe in Los Angeles, though it would not be entirely shocking if he did get fired.

The Verdict

At the end of the day, this Clippers team is still immensely talented. They have a 2 time Finals MVP, a player who finished 3rd in MVP voting a couple of years ago, 2 Six Man of the Year winners, and a great coach to go along with more solid complementary pieces.
Did the Clippers choke this series? Yes. Did the lack of adjustment and over reliance on star power cost them? 100%. But is it smart to just dismiss them completely as title contenders? No. The Clippers will be back next year, ready to challenge for a title. For the number of picks and players they gave up to assemble this team, it would be unfathomable to think they would blow it up so soon. However, if the Clippers are not able to win a title in 2021, and Kawhi Leonard and Paul George leave, they may run the risk of becoming one of the worst franchises in the NBA for a long time. The Clippers do not have a single first round pick until 2026, so if this group does leave, they will undoubtedly become the new “Brooklyn Nets” of the NBA.
Though, to answer the question if the Clippers can win a title with this group, they most certainly can. But it is going to take a better coaching job from Doc Rivers’ staff as well as more accountability on the players if they ever want to compete not just with their hometown rival Lakers, but with the rest of the elite in the NBA.
Thank you for reading. Feedback is much appreciated. Let me know if there are any other topics I should go indepth into.
submitted by TheTipOff to nbadiscussion [link] [comments]


2020.09.17 14:21 anonextra To the anti-blackpill lurkers out there, how do you argue against the idea that relationships and sex are important for life satisfaction?

First of all, I don’t think anyone’s entitled to relationships or sex. Some might disagree with me (but probably less than you think. People who believe in the entitlement to sex usually post on incels.co, and even there not everyone is in agreement).
I just want more people to acknowledge that you’re less likely to lead a satisfying life without sex and relationships.
So, I’m going to link a few studies to back up my point.

“Orientations to Happiness and the Experience of Everyday Activities”
https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/8040/thesis_fulltext.pdf;sequence=1
Quote:
“Sex/making love was the highest rated behavior on all dimensions in this dataset, consistent with several other daily activity studies (Kahneman et al., 2004; Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010; Robinson & Godbey, 1997).”

“The emotional cost of poor mating performance”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328095576_The_emotional_cost_of_poor_mating_performance
Quotes:
“Consistent with our original hypothesis, we found that people who indicated poor mating performance experienced more negative emotions such as sadness and loneliness, and fewer positive emotions such as happiness and excitement, and they were less satisfied with their lives.”
“To put it differently, a substantial part of poor emotional state observed in the population may be due to poor mating performance. This being the case, research in this area can potentially have important implications for improving well-being—poor mental state could be improved by devising ways to improve mating performance. In turn, this has implications that go beyond the realm of psychology.”
“Alleviating poor mating performance, in most instances, requires external to the individual assistance.”

“Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review”
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691614568352
Quotes:
“Actual and perceived social isolation are both associated with increased risk for early mortality.”
“Across studies in which several possible confounds were statistically controlled for, the weighted average effect sizes were as follows: social isolation odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, loneliness OR = 1.26, and living alone OR = 1.32, corresponding to an average of 29%, 26%, and 32% increased likelihood of mortality, respectively.”
“Results also differ across participant age, with social deficits being more predictive of death in samples with an average age younger than 65 years.”
“Overall, the influence of both objective and subjective social isolation on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality.”

“Gender differences in depression in 23 European countries. Cross-national variation in the gender gap in depression”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953610002844?via%3Dihub
Quote:
“Moreover, men seem to suffer more from the loss of a partner, especially since their wife is often also their closest confidant, while women often have confidants that are outside the family. This is partly reflected in our results, with widowhood as well as single-hood being a more significant risk factor for depression in men.”

“Predictors of Early Recovery From Major Depression Among Persons Admitted to Community-Based Clinics”
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/206644
Quotes:
“Being married (OR = 2.4;95% CI = 1.1-5.3; P = .03) was the only other baseline characteristic or treatment variable that remained significant in the logistic regression.”
“Less severe depression, having received adequate antidepressant treatment, female sex, and being married independently predicted early recovery”

“Warm Partner Contact Is Related to Lower Cardiovascular Reactivity”
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08964280309596065
submitted by anonextra to IncelsWithoutHate [link] [comments]


2020.09.17 02:00 MarkLCM Maintenance Magazine #23: PES2020 IMs and Legends Round-up

Hello again my dear readers, it's been a while! Hope all of you are well and safe!
PES2020 had been a downward slope for me overall, with the lack of offline event variety and legend releases being the real deal-breakers that almost prompted me to quit the game outright. Thankfully KONAMI fixed the latter half of the problem at the end of the season, sparked a wave of excitement for me and I got my hands on a few good legend players. To give credit where it's due, IMs were a touch of genius from KONAMI, as I believe they bring a nice balance between the dynamics of F2P and P2P. Moreover, permanently setting the conditions of legends and IMs to B is simply fantastic. Some of you in the sub believe legends have hidden stats; well, that's your hidden stats right there.
With PES2020 coming to a close, I think it's the time again to re-re-review every legend in my collection (I really hope you guys don't find these boring tbh, but I do really enjoy reviewing my legends) and give proper recognition to the new legends/IMs I gained. The departing Inter / Milan legends also deserve a proper send-off.
To those unfamiliar with my work, my review is purely subjective and your mileage may vary. The effectiveness of a player depends highly on the playstyle, formation and his teammates. Nevertheless, I rate players using a tier system (S > A > B > C etc.). I've also included reference ratings of popular base players for comparison and calibration. Anyone can compare stats on PESDB; in contrast, I try to focus less on the stats and convey how the player feels in actual gameplay.
For my regular followers, I'll avoid repeating myself as much as possible, keeping it short for old players unless I have new opinions about them. Some of you might find my reviews and ratings of certain players to have changed quite significantly this time, mostly due to difference in gameplay of PES2020 vs. previous iterations (e.g. nerfed skill moves, rise of finesse dribbling, nerfed passes etc). Here's a tiny tease to treat the fans: previously exclusive to Cruyff and Vieira, the S+ tier club now tentatively has 5 members! What are their identities? What's with the "tentativeness"? Read on to find out!
An important caveat is that I am a largely F2P & offline player. This means I have very limited access to coins and thus I do not own many IMs / coin-exclusive new legends. Needless to say I have not been lucky in the European legends free pulls, but I've emptied the latest box draws to get the most out of them. Sorry for the incomplete list but that's just the way I roll.
Just to be clear on my stance, I am all for the P2P exclusivity of IMs. In fact, let P2P have coin-exclusive box draws to make sure people get what they want without having to spend a mortgage. I just wish KONAMI can allow the use of GP in legend agents (non-guaranteed draws), so the F2P population has limited but farmable access to any future new legends released.
And without further ado, let the reviews begin!
Unless stated otherwise, all players reviewed below are legends and the reference players are base players. IMs will be explicitly stated. All players are rated by their performances at max level.
GK (reference - - Alisson: A)
TOLDO: A
I used to think of him quite poorly, and quite honestly he still sucked for me earlier this year. Not until recently when I played him again for this review when he finally started to play quite well, using his towering height to his full advantage. As if a last hurrah before getting removed.
Despite all that, I'm not unhappy to see him go, especially since I've got three copies of him waiting to Digivolve into Casillasmon. By the way, KONAMI, I have 3 Toldos and 4 Kahns in my squad. Can I have other non-dupe outfield players instead?
CECH: S- (tentative)
I got Cech, along with several others on this list, very recently in the current box draw. Due to my limited experience of these players, I felt uneasy assigning a definitive rating to them. On the other hand, I didn't want to leave them out as I wanted to help players make their decision on whether to go for them or not. Hence I settled on the tentative rating and review, which should be treated more appropriately as my first impressions.
Cech has been stopping all kinds of shots for me. Powerful long rangers, point-blank first-timers, crosses, he's got them all covered. He's not the best when it comes to rushing out in one-on-ones, he manages to react in about half of those instances. Also he's dreadful against free kicks. His Low Punt skill, quite rare among legend GKs, come in handy quite often.
KAHN: S-
Der Titan has considerably improved compared to PES19, thanks to the buff to defensive GK playstyle. He has been my starting GK for almost all-year. From experience he makes around two-thirds of shots on target against Superstar COM by my estimation, which is not bad at all! Kahn's strength lies in the fact that he's equally good staying on the line and rushing out (he charges at an astonishing pace too!), but the player has to consciously make the right decision. The more I use him, the better I get at noticing the subtle differences between shots that require rushing and shots that don't.
CB (reference - - Koulibaly: A; VVD: S-)
SAMUEL: C+
In this day and age, where you find featured Mbappes, Ronaldos and Rashfords in more teams than they are not, ol' Samuel is simply too slow to keep up. Pairing him with a defensively minded (non build-up) & fast CB might help slightly, or he might work with triple/quadruple CB formations, but that just goes to show how independently unreliable he is.
Adieu, Samuel. Unfortunately you will not be missed.
CAMPBELL: S-
This ex-GB may be upgraded to BB, but his in-game performance seems slightly worse than PES19, when he used to be nigh unstoppable in the air. Again, this may be due to the opponents he's against (looking at you featured Ronaldo/Lewa). That said, with his decent speed and tackling, he's still one of the better defenders in the game.
BERGOMI: S
Got this underrated gem in the European legends draw and has grown quite attached. His skillset is frankly quite extraordinary. He is one of the fastest CBs out there, which makes him excellent in tracking back and covering for the defence. It also makes him an excellent full back as well. His defensive ability is solid, with strong positioning and physicality. He scores additional points for breathtaking long-rangers, even netting several match-winners for me which I'd never forget. Tackles are not first-rate, which is his major setback.
Despite my short time with him, he is one of the three players whose departure greatly saddens me. And the saddest part? I already own all the possible replacements that we know of so far.
MALDINI: S
Still remember getting him in PES18 and he single-handedly revolutionized my defence. The most all-rounded and versatile out of all my defenders, he always finds a place in any defensive line-up. You can literally pair him with any other CB and he'll play well. I was scared af by the thought of losing him but thankfully he survives the snap.
PUYOL: S
This is the second (and final) player I managed to get from the free European legends agents. He's the only player I hoped to get and I was lucky to get him for free. Growing up watching invincible Barca made me respect him as a player. He's also the closest I can get to legendary Chelsea captain Terry, both in terms of playing style and aura of captaincy.
Digressions aside, Puyol is magnificent in the game. He has one of the highest accelerations among CBs, and together with his positioning he is rarely off his mark. His tackles, particularly his standing tackles, are absolutely the best, even ahead of Maldini. Practically steals the ball anywhere near him. He is also majestic in the air and a constant corner threat. Could not have been more happy with him.
BECKENBAUER: S+ (tentative)
Before I go on, I should really stress that I only obtained him for a week, but what I've seen so far has already convinced me to place him in the S+ tier.
In defence, he is performing at the same level as Maldini. Clean tackles, majestic headers and plenty of interceptions due to his masterful ability to read the game. His speed is top-notch among CBs, and he's been showcasing his ability to track back and defend. He's also surprisingly good in the air.
What makes him unique is his offensive capabilities. Even when playing as CB, he charges forward aggressively, with a frequency unmatched by any other so-called offensive CBs like Pique or Ramos. The CB closest to him in offence is perhaps Bergomi, in terms of their finishing and speed, but that's where the similarities end. He has an acute positional sense, pinpoint passing and reliable goalscoring. To put it simply, Beckenbauer has the complete skill set of an AMF.
His 85-rated stamina is often drained around the 80-minute mark, but that is just a testament to the amount of ground he covers. Like his German compatriot Matthaus, his Fighting Spirit skill also helps keeping his performance consistent until the final whistle. I suppose the only problem with Der Kaiser is that playing him in CB is putting his attacking talent to waste, and when he joins the attack there's no guarantee he can make it back in time to defend every threat. For these reasons, he is exceptional at DMF/CMF. I've yet to experiment playing him in other positions like RB/AMF, but I'm pretty sure he excels in whatever position he's being deployed.
LB/RB (reference - - TAA: A)
LIZARAZU: A (tentative)
So far he has been fairly consistent in defence, despite his unimpressive defensive stats; his pace and stamina makes up for his lack of tackling and interception abilities. Nothing to complain about his offensive game either. A solid alternative to Carlos given the limited choice of legendary full-backs.
CARLOS: A
The Brazillian full-back has been solid for me. His work-rate has been excellent, but lately he's been the sort of silent contributor that's hard to notice or appreciate. A tackle here, a run there, but he's not really doing a lot in terms of attacking and crosses. His presence is noticeable but not dazzling. He is also a quality LMF. As for free kick takers, I have better choices.
ZANETTI: S
He is a rock-solid defender who actively charges forward when there's space available, but also knows when to fall back and cover defensive gaps. His endless stamina befits his nickname of El Tractor. His crossing is also impeccable.
I'll likely be getting Cafu as a replacement, but Zanetti's imminent departure from the franchise leaves a gaping hole in my squad and in my heart.
DMF (reference - - Busquets: B+)
PETIT: B-
An average player for all intents and purposes. Interestingly, he positions himself like an Anchor Man despite his playstyle, meaning he stays at the back more often, which suits me just fine. His tackling is merely average; it's sometimes frustrating with him as I find him in good positions more often than most DMFs on this list, but he does so little when given the chance.
PIRLO: B+
Pirlo, Pirlo, why do you pains me so? I really, really liked Pirlo irl. So much so that I've written a long piece about him (and if you haven't done so already, I recommend giving it a read, as it is the piece of work I'm most proud of).
Months have passed and my review of him is largely the same. His defense sucks just as his stats suggest, and his passes and dribbles are not as perfect as his stats seem to suggest. On the other hand, he charges forward quite often and his runs are great. As a result, he's been scoring consistently in open play in addition to his deadly free kicks. His long range curlers from the edge of the box has also been a regular source of goals.
The Italian Maestro is an enigma. He is not your typical DMF. He contributes more offensively than defensively, so bear that in mind when you balance your squad. I would say he functions like a CMF/AMF in terms of offence vs defence.
IM PIRLO: A-
Apparently KONAMI must have read my article of base Pirlo and rewards me with an IM, coz that's the only IM I've got from the recent free draws so far.
Stats-wise, his IM version is nearly identical to his regular version when maxed. In play, IM Pirlo is visibly better at his defensive duties, although still way behind the usual standards of a typical DMF. Offensively, his long range power shots now find the target more often than they did before. Overall the way he plays feel the same, and the IM is just a minor upgrade. You're not missing out if you have the legend version.
CAMBIASSO: A-
A very defensive-minded player who arguably plays better as a CB. He's simply great at defending, very all-rounded in most defensive aspects. The problem with him lies in his lack of contributions to the build up play. He's usually unwilling to move, and that makes me feel I'm missing a midfielder to link up my play, consistently missing one passing option. Also when he decides to involve himself, his low passes (especially through balls) are nowhere as accurate as his stats would make you believe. Similar to Pirlo, he nails one half of the prerequisites for a great DMF, only to absolutely flop the other half.
As solid as he his, there are better DMFs out there so I'm not too sad to say goodbye to the Argentine.
INAMOTO: A
I was initially skeptical when KONAMI gifted me a GB legend; when I tried him out, I only regretted not having done so sooner. He's got a very balanced skill set that enables him to contribute in both defending and attacking. He's got good marking and tackling, can pass the ball well, and can score bangers from range. One of the main duties of my DMFs is to scoop up the loose ball after the opponent defence heads the ball clear in corners, and I notice Inamoto does this extremely reliably. His main drawback is his unimposing stature, meaning he gets outmuscled quite often and concedes possession.
VIEIRA: S+
If you have been in this sub for a while, you would have seen everyone sing praises about him, myself included. This legend deserves every bit of praise he gets, and he simply cannot be better. An absolute monster in defence, with an often overlooked eye for long rangers. The man once scored a hat trick during the first half of a campaign game. This truly extraordinary player proudly retains his position in the S+ tier club.
CMF (reference - - S.M.Savic / Kante: A)
SCHOLES: C+
In stark contrast to the next player on the list, Scholesy is often nowhere to be seen. Sometimes I even forget he's on the pitch. You read his stats and you think, I could do with a complete player like him, and then he turns out to be a complete....disaster. With his playstyle he hangs in the back, but he's terrible at tackling, man marking and headers. Passing play with him is a nightmare, he's either too slow or unwilling to move when he's on the receiving end of a pass. Even his trademark cannonballs are gone; I tried three shots with him just at the edge of the box and none of them ended up on target, and that was during an exhibition match at Regular difficulty. I was thrilled to see him in a GP box draw, and could not be more disappointed.
Despite my one-sided rants above, I'm perhaps in the minority among the sub when it comes to opinions on Scholes. u/big_rom9 once commented he also had problems playing IM Scholes at CMF, but eventually playing him well as SS. Personally yet to try this out, and if anyone has done so please share your experience in the comments! I've also read there's a rather large disparity between his IM and legend versions.
MATTHAUS: S-
The German has always been one of my top players, but his performance this year slightly dipped compared to previous years. His positioning seems a bit off, and his inability to withhold the ball under pressure has never been more apparent. Despite all that, he's still covering miles like the Kante meme, and his interceptions, passes and assists are still top-notch.
LMF/RMF (reference - - Asensio: A)
PIRES: B+
The Frenchman makes good runs, but does very little with it. His finishing is good but not great, and he can't really cross with his weaker left foot. He took a big hit when skill moves were nerfed, and he lost the means of cutting into the middle and score, like a reverse Robben in the left wing.
IM PIRES: A
The IM stat boost here really shows! His runs are much more effective thanks to the hefty boost in offensive awareness, and his finishing is considerably improved by his swerve and kicking power. Unlike his legend counterpart, Pires has become a real goalscoring threat, and defenders will be punished for leaving him alone.
NEDVED: A
I've always held Nedved in very high regard but lately his renowned long rangers have been lacking in accuracy. It is funny how most of his contribution is tied to his goalscoring; take that away and I'm still left with a versatile midfielder with an incredible workrate, but he's just not the same. He's an omnipresent passing option when your team has the ball, but he does little to help win possession back, so basically he's Matthaus halved.
BECHKAM (aged 27): A
Becks is a textbook example of a classic winger: he runs into wide spaces and crosses with pinpoint accuracy. Conversely, play him as a left CMF or left AMF (not many formations have those though), and be amazed by the accuracy of his curlers from range. I still get mad when I see him at DMF just for his OVR though. I toy around him when I see him at DMF in campaign matches. Not even Superstar COM can make him good there, and you know something's gone wrong.
PARK JI-SUNG: A+
The South Korean legend is undoubtedly the best Asian player in the game! He has so much in common with Nedved in PES18: endless stamina (I'm almost convinced his stamina is around 150, judging from his stamina bar at the end of a match), quick on his feet, close ball control, strong passing game, and incredible versatility. Don't let his measly finishing stats fool you too. I've been shooting with him from 20 - 25 yards from goal and getting used to see them fly in untouched. It really goes to show how unreliable stats are; or to look at it another way, how the performance of legends can really catch you by surprise!
AMF (reference - - Mount: B; featured Messi (no.10 campaign): S) (sorry I haven't been using a lot of base players as AMF)
VAN DER VAART: C
Dude's slow. Like, REEEEALLY SLOWWWW. His terrible attacking positioning also does not help at all. Despite his decent passing and goalscoring ability, Van der Vaart is a beaming symbol of a old-fashioned playstyle that has been rendered powerless by the current, physical footballing climate.
DECO: C+ (tentative)
Another AMF with terrible offensive positioning that I did not enjoy using. Deco's slowness is less prominent as he can dribble past defenders, yet that same defender will rapidly catch up and force Deco to pass the ball away. His passing and finishing is slightly worse than Van der Vaart. Notably, he is a rare AMF with the Creative Playmaker style rather than CN10. If you are a fan of that style you might want to check him out, but he's a hard no for me.
ONO: B-
I was surprised to see KONAMI releasing a 94-rated legend for free, but his stats wildly overestimates his ability on the pitch. He's just a normal midfielder that has above average dribbling, passes decently and nothing really impressive up his sleeve.
DJORKAEFF: B-
I used to think highly of him due to his excellent dribbling, but that aspect of him has been nerfed to the ground. Marseille Turn is like an open invitation for tackles, and finess dribbling without physicality to back it up is often disastrous. He remaining strength lies in his surprisingly clinical finishing.
You can probably guess I'm perfectly fine with him getting replaced. The problem is I already own every single legend AMF (I believe), so hopefully KONAMI releases somebody new straight at launch!
GULLIT: B+
If Gullit was just an AMF, I would rate him a B at most. Gullit's biggest strength is his versatility. He's a strong CF with a powerful right foot and great in the air. He's a good CMF/DMF with a strong tackling and intercepting game, coupled with highly effective finesse dribbling thanks to his physical strength. His performance is surprisingly consistent at CB, making tackles ably and great in the air. Did I mention he's great in the air?
NAKATA: B+
Nakata is a surprisingly effective attacker. For me, he plays his best games on either wing. If you have access to one of those rare triple AMF formations, play him on either side; otherwise, he's decent at LMF/RMF, but not as great in central AMF. The timing of his runs are excellent, and he can finish from range. His stamina also keeps him effective for the entire game.
IM NAKAMURA: A-
I recall seeing him in a box draw, and with mountains of GP to spare I decided to go all-in, only to get him in my second try. The renowned free-kick specialist is just as deadly in the game; not quite as godly as Becks or Pirlo, but still comparable with Messi in that regard. His finishing is quite strong in open play, and he's a technically gifted playmaker.
RONALDINHO (GB, aged 39): A
I originally thought of including him as a bit of a joke, and spent the cash to get him fully expecting him to be quite useless (look at what I'll do for you guys!). Turns out, Grandpa Dinho with the Nike headband is not to be messed with. In a world where Busquets can outrun Messi (a.k.a. campaigns), Ronaldinho still manages to outpace defenders with his speed bursts at a ripe old age of thirty-nine and sporting a rather large belly (irl). His long rangers are absolutely lethal. Unsurprisingly, his main drawback is his stamina not lasting the entire match, which is very understandable, to say the least. During the limited time he's on the pitch, his impact is quite remarkable.
ZICO: A+
I notoriously criticized Zico in one of my earlier entries, and since then the White Pele has been consistently improving. Like Nakata, he is most effective on the wing (wide AMF or SS), where his devastating runs and finesse shots are in full effect, and he avoids the amount of pressure he faces when he is deployed in the center.
RONALDINHO: S
If Ronaldinho way past his prime is that good, surely he should be great in his prime? Indeed he is unstoppable, being one of the best finesse dribblers in the game and a deadly eye for goal. He plays as well on the wings as he does in the middle, and when it comes to beating defenders, he has a vast array of options to choose from, be it dazzling dribbles or sudden bursts of speed. In terms of offensive skills, he is the complete package.
If I have one reservation about him, it is his inability to transform the players around him. He shines brightly on his own, but there's only so much a single player can do. He's not a gamechanger, if that makes any sense.
RIVALDO: S+
As someone once said, "Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get". And in the Brazillian's case, what I got was a perfect offensive player comparable to Cruyff, which are words I never thought I would attribute to a CN10.
Rivaldo is another example that demonstrates the inadequacy of stats in measuring player quality. Contrary to all common stereotypes of CN10s, Rivaldo charges forward all the time, whenever he gets the chance, and always with impeccable timing. His long rangers find the back of the net nine times out of ten. His amazing first touch is reminiscent of Cruyff, where he switches from the receiving end of a pass to a playmaking position in one swift, fluid motion. For those who are complaining about Cruyff being absent in the recent draws, Rivaldo was the next best thing.
Compared to the Dutch grandmaster, Rivaldo is definitely slower, but he makes it up with superior powerful shots. Either way, both S+ tier players have the transformative property that revitalizes the entire offence, bringing out the best in every attacker.
LWF/RWF (reference - - Sterling / Sancho: A; Messi / Ronaldo: S)
GIULY: B- (tentative)
In the short time since I've got him, he has yet to impress me. His picture shares an uncanny resemblance with the ex-Chelsea player Pedro, and the same can be said for his play. He's just a fairly average winger with decent speed and crossing, but he doesn't make intelligent runs as often as I would expect from a Hole Player.
He's another player to be replaced that I probably won't miss. Since the only eligible replacement so far is Figo, I'd say it's worth it to go for Guily if you haven't got Figo yet.
FIGO: S
Now that I've established how players like Nedved and Scholes, experts of their craft, can mess up their long range shooting all the time, the ability to reliably score from outside the box suddenly seem all the more valuable, and Figo does that masterfully with either foot. His long rangers (both power and finesse) are a joy, and his dribbling is elegant and effective. His versatility among the offensive ranks is remarkable. His movement off the ball and accurate passing also allows solid buildup play. He's a breath of fresh air in contrast to speedsters like Sane and Sancho, but this also means I had to adjust my play style to get the best out of him. Overall the Portuguese is a phenomenal winger.
SS (reference - - Dybala: A; Joao Felix: A+)
RECOBA: B+
A striker with a deadly left foot and incredible curl. Unfortunately, his passing is below average for an SS, and he has to be subbed after an hour or so.
I've had a decent time with him, but I'm not at all unhappy to see him get replaced. Several top-tier SSs are still missing in my squad and I'd be thrilled to get my hands on any one of them.
TOTTI: A
The Italian genius plays unlike any other SS on the list. He is considerably stronger than the rest, while his speed and dribbling is sub-par. To use him well, I had to rely on my passing game, which hasn't been the most reliable in PES2020.
BEBETO: A+
Bebeto wrecks havoc in dangerous areas with his runs, sensational dribbles and low centre of gravity. His ambidexterity makes him highly effective on either wing. He is also a great assister thanks to his One-touch Pass ability. His celebration never gets old.
MARADONA: S
I feel like I don't have to elaborate on the strengths of Diego Maradona. The reason he's not S+ is similar to Ronaldinho: the brilliance is in himself and himself only.
IM MARADONA: S
Maradona's free IM version is the most generous guaranteed player KONAMI has ever gifted for free. Despite inferior stats, his ranged shots curl right into the net reliably like his older counterpart. The increased pace and stamina of IM Maradona also balances out his weaker dribbling and passing. Overall the two players are similarly effective in my opinion.
CRUYFF: S+
Again, it feels silly to explain why the Dutch legend is S+ tier. He is simply the most complete attacker in the game with no apparent weaknesses. The kind of player to build a squad around and can turn the tide of a game.
CF (reference - - Auba: A-, Jovic/Kane: A; Haaland: A+; Aguero: S-; Mbappe: S)
YORKE / COLE: B-
The Man Utd twins play so similarly I've decided to group them together. "Adequate" is the word that describes them most adequately, pun intended. Both players are moderately strong, mildly clinical, somewhat quick and position themselves quite well. They have a bit of everything in a typical CF's skillset, but nothing stands out at all.
KLUIVERT: B
At least some clear strengths on this one. The Dutchman is splendid in the air. He's also one of the better dribblers among CFs. On the flip side, he seldom makes useful runs so he's almost restricted to the crossing playstyle.
MASSARO: B+
An often overlooked CF due to his low OVR of 89. His finishing is clinical, positioning is surprisingly solid and he has the strength to withhold the ball. He plays like an ambidextrous Giroud, though weaker in the air.
Since I've got most of the GB CFs, I'm not sure how I feel to see him go. It would be great if I get Inzaghi in exchange, but I believe I've already got all the other good ones.
KOLLER: B+ (tentative)
Aerially dominant just as one would expect of a 2-metre forward. He reminds me of playing PES on the console back in the old days in 2004-05, when crossing was basically OP with Chelsea/Inter. Any cross that reaches Koller basically guarantees a header on target, although the Superstar GKs nowadays tend to save most of those. His right-footed finish isn't half bad either. The best thing about him is his Super-Sub skill, which makes him a great player on the bench and nearly always in top form when subbed in.
SALAS: B+
Salas resembles a SS more than a CF. He's a great retainer and passer of the ball, and his finishing is exceptional; yet, he falls back to support the build up quite often, and he's usually not the one who makes the mazing runs that tear across defences. He mostly scores from one-twos or back passes from a holding forward, someone like his devastating Chilean partner irl. He excels in double CF formations, but don't expect him to perform well on his own.
ZAMORANO: A
Zamorano is an exemplary predator. There's nothing flashy about him, he just gets into the right position and scores. His finishing is top-notch with either power or finesse, despite his stats heavily leaning into the former. The reason he's not higher up on the tier list is occasionally he can be completely contained by a top-tier defender (e.g. Featured Koulibaly).
OWEN: A
You don't have to look hard to notice his uncanny similarity with Aguero. Both men are deadly strikers with low centres of gravity, devastating runs and clinical finishes. Owen's blinding speed looks good on paper, but in reality often does not work when he's being marked by a quick CB. He is often outmuscled during his runs and dispossessed by the slightest of tackles, so he desparately needs another CF / hole player / dummy runner to draw away pressure from him. However, with his top-notch finishing, he converts reliably when he's free from his mark. He is also a surprisingly strong assister.
ADRIANO: A+
The archetypal power forward with beastly strength, speed and shot power. Sadly, Adriano will never be S tier material when he consistently runs out of steam near the hour mark.
He's probably the closest to Ronaldo Nazario we'll ever get, and he will be sorely missed alongside Zanetti and Bergomi. I do hope I get a nice non-duplicate as replacement though.
BATISTUTA: S-
Among all the forwards on the list, Batigol is the most complete player and my go-to choice in single CF formations. He's like the Swiss army knife of CFs, he can do everything extremely well: he can score with power or finesse with either feet, he is a threat in the air, he has strength to retain the ball under pressure, he makes great runs and has enough stamina to last an entire match.
LAW: S
Law is OP in very specific areas: spatial awareness, runs and finishing. Basically like an ambidextrous Zamorano on steroids. What he does have is a very particular set of skills. Skills that make him a nightmare for all defenders alike. If there's a space in the defence or a loose ball around, he will look for it, he will find it, and he will score a goal out of it.
Like Zamorano, his playstyle is atypical and there's a bit of a learning curve. But when you eventually get past it, boy you are in for a ride.
Annoyingly, the AI often auto-subs him off for no apparent reason during half time despite he's still full of stamina. This only happens to Law and I'm still yet to figure out why.
ROMARIO: S+
A lot of people on the sub have recently got hold of Romario in the box draw, and have finally recognized the beauty of this endgame striker. He is simply the best at putting the ball into the net. His incredible speed, unyielding strength and remarkable finishing makes him the most consistent goalscoring threat in my entire legends squad. The more CFs I got, the more I appreciated how rare his remarkable goalscoring ability is. It's unfair but true that goalscoring is the first and foremost way a player can impact the results of a match, so I felt the best player in this department deserves a place in the prestigious S+ club.
And that is the end of my lengthy review! Hopefully this gives an idea of whether to go all-in for a box draw or not. Thanks for sticking with me to the very end! Cheers everyone!
...........Sad to see this end? Well let's keep it going with a bonus feature! The top 5 released legends on my wishlist!
  1. Del Piero
A potentially endgame attacker who's just as good at creating goals as scoring them. Looking forward to his amazing curved shots!
  1. Van Basten
Probably the best CF alongside Romario according to this sub, Van Basten's stats certainly live up to his hype, but we all know how dangerously unreliable stats are...
  1. Inzaghi
Surprised to see him ahead of MVB? Inzaghi is one of the rare legends, alongside Koller, to have the Super-Sub skill, and together with his permanent B condition he'll be constantly in top-form. His 99 attacking awareness and finishing also sounds like pure gold.
  1. Rummenigge
Hailed by the sub as the next Cruyff, I certainly had a hard time defending against him. He seems to be another true all-round attacker which can strengthen any squad.
  1. Lampard
Can you blame me as a Chelsea fan? He will always be a true legend close to my heart, and I am dying to experience his incredible goalscoring ability (please don't mess this up KONAMI, although from what I've heard on this sub he seems to be fineeeeeee). I once predicted him to be worse than Matthaus, but upon release Lampard seems even better! His Hole Player playing style and complete stats looks like my dream come true.
Having said all that, KONAMI wil likely stick to their trend of releasing new legends in 2021. There's already a plethora of attackers in the pool, so I desperately hope to see more representation among CBs (e.g. Terry, Cannavaro, Nesta, Ferdinand, Vidic), keepers (Yashin, Zoff, Banks, Schmeichel), full-backs (Lahm, Thuram, Neville, Cole) and CMFs (Charlton, Keane, Gerrard, Seedorf). It's also sad to notice not a single African have joined the ranks of Legends, even though there's a literal gold mine out there (Weah, Drogba, Essien, Eto'o, Toure).
And this really is the end of this piece, everyone. Not gonna lie, feeling a bit nervous as this is my first full post in months, but it's been fun writing once again. To new members of the sub, if you liked my content, there are more entries of the Maintenance Magazine just one search away. For now, my friends, stay safe, be well, and have a lovely maintenance day.
EDIT: if the data miners are right, looks like I'm getting no. 2 and 5 on my wishlist!
submitted by MarkLCM to pesmobile [link] [comments]


2020.09.16 17:05 DamnDam Meta: Congratulations! You just won millions of dollars in the lottery!

Congratulations! You just won millions of dollars in the lottery! That's great.
Now you're fucked.
No really.
You are.
You're fucked.
If you just want to skip the biographical tales of woe of some of the math-tax protagonists, skip on down to the next comment. To see what to do in the event you win the lottery.
You see, it's something of an open secret that winners of obnoxiously large jackpots tend to end up badly with alarming regularity. Not the $1 million dollar winners. But anyone in the nine-figure range is at high risk. Eight-figures? Pretty likely to be screwed. Seven-figures? Yep. Painful. Perhaps this is a consequence of the sample. The demographics of lottery players might be exactly the wrong people to win large sums of money. Or perhaps money is the root of all evil. Either way, you are going to have to be careful. Don't believe me? Consider this:
Large jackpot winners face double digit multiples of probability versus the general population to be the victim of:
1. Homicide (something like 20x more likely)
2. Drug overdose
3. Bankruptcy (how's that for irony?)
4. Kidnapping
And triple digit multiples of probability versus the general population rate to be:
1. Convicted of drunk driving
2. The victim of Homicide (at the hands of a family member) 120x more likely in this case, ain't love grand?
3. A defendant in a civil lawsuit
4. A defendant in felony criminal proceedings
Believe it or not, your biggest enemy if you suddenly become possessed of large sums of money is... you. At least you will have the consolation of meeting your fate by your own hand. But if you can't manage it on your own, don't worry. There are any number of willing participants ready to help you start your vicious downward spiral for you. Mind you, many of these will be "friends," "friendly neighbors," or "family." Often, they won't even have evil intentions. But, as I'm sure you know, that makes little difference in the end. Most aren't evil. Most aren't malicious. Some are. None are good for you.
Jack Whittaker, a Johnny Cash attired, West Virginia native, is the poster boy for the dangers of a lump sum award. In 2002 Mr. Whittaker (55 years old at the time) won what was, also at the time, the largest single award jackpot in U.S. history. $315 million. At the time, he planned to live as if nothing had changed, or so he said. He was remarkably modest and decent before the jackpot, and his ship sure came in, right? Wrong.
Mr. Whittaker became the subject of a number of personal challenges, escalating into personal tragedies, complicated by a number of legal troubles.
Whittaker wasn't a typical lottery winner either. His net worth at the time of his winnings was in excess of $15 million, owing to his ownership of a successful contracting firm in West Virginia. His claim to want to live "as if nothing had changed" actually seemed plausible. He should have been well equipped for wealth. He was already quite wealthy, after all. By all accounts he was somewhat modest, low profile, generous and good natured. He should have coasted off into the sunset. Yeah. Not exactly.
Whittaker took the all-cash option, $170 million, instead of the annuity option, and took possession of $114 million in cash after $56 million in taxes. After that, things went south.
Whittaker quickly became the subject of a number of financial stalkers, who would lurk at his regular breakfast hideout and accost him with suggestions for how to spend his money. They were unemployed. No, an interview tomorrow morning wasn't good enough. They needed cash NOW. Perhaps they had a sure-fire business plan. Their daughter had cancer. A niece needed dialysis. Needless to say, Whittaker stopped going to his breakfast haunt. Eventually, they began ringing his doorbell. Sometimes in the early morning. Before long he was paying off-duty deputies to protect his family. He was accused of being heartless. Cold. Stingy.
Letters poured in. Children with cancer. Diabetes. MS. You name it. He hired three people to sort the mail. A detective to filter out the false claims and the con men (and women) was retained.
Brenda, the clerk who had sold Whittaker the ticket, was a victim of collateral damage. Whittaker had written her a check for $44,000 and bought her house, but she was by no means a millionaire. Rumors that the state routinely paid the clerk who had sold the ticket 10% of the jackpot winnings hounded her. She was followed home from work. Threatened. Assaulted.
Whittaker's car was twice broken into, by trusted acquaintances who watched him leave large amounts of cash in it. $500,000 and $200,000 were stolen in two separate instances. The thieves spiked Whittaker's drink with prescription drugs in the first instance. The second incident was the handiwork of his granddaughter's friends, who had been probing the girl for details on Whittaker's cash for weeks.
Even Whittaker's good-faith generosity was questioned. When he offered $10,000 to improve the city's water park so that it was more handicap accessible, locals complained that he spent more money at the strip club. (Amusingly this was true).
Whittaker invested quite a bit in his own businesses, tripled the number of people his businesses employed (making him one of the larger employers in the area) and eventually had given away $14 million to charity through a foundation he set up for the purpose. This is, of course, what you are "supposed" to do. Set up a foundation. Be careful about your charity giving. It made no difference in the end.
To top it all off, Whittaker had been accused of ruining a number of marriages. His money made other men look inferior, they said, wherever he went in the small West Virginia town he called home. Resentment grew quickly. And festered. Whittaker paid four settlements related to this sort of claim. Yes, you read that right. Four.
His family and their immediate circle were quickly the victims of odds-defying numbers of overdoses, emergency room visits and even fatalities. His granddaughter, the eighteen year old "Brandi" (who Whittaker had been giving a $2100.00 per week allowance) was found dead after having been missing for several weeks. Her death was, apparently, from a drug overdose, but Whittaker suspected foul play. Her body had been wrapped in a tarp and hidden behind a rusted-out van. Her seventeen year old boyfriend had expired three months earlier in Whittaker's vacation house, also from an overdose. Some of his friends had robbed the house after his overdose, stepping over his body to make their escape and then returning for more before stepping over his body again to leave. His parents sued for wrongful death claiming that Whittaker's loose purse strings contributed to their son's death. Amazingly, juries are prone to award damages in cases such as these. Whittaker settled. Again.
Even before the deaths, the local and state police had taken a special interest in Whittaker after his new-found fame. He was arrested for minor and less minor offenses many times after his winnings, despite having had a nearly spotless record before the award. Whittaker's high profile couldn't have helped him much in this regard.
In 18 months Whittaker had been cited for over 250 violations ranging from broken tail lights on every one of his five new cars, to improper display of renewal stickers. A lawsuit charging various police organizations with harassment went nowhere and Whittaker was hit with court costs instead.
Whittaker's wife filed for divorce, and in the process froze a number of his assets and the accounts of his operating companies. Caesars in Atlantic City sued him for $1.5 million to cover bounced checks, caused by the asset freeze.
Today Whittaker is badly in debt, and bankruptcy looms large in his future.
But, hey, that's just one example, right?
Wrong.
Nearly one third of multi-million dollar jackpot winners eventually declare bankruptcy. Some end up worse. To give you just a taste of the possibilities, consider the fates of:
So, what the hell DO you do if you are unlucky enough to win the lottery?
This is the absolutely most important thing you can do right away: NOTHING.
Yes. Nothing.
DO NOT DECLARE YOURSELF THE WINNER yet.
Do NOT tell anyone. The urge is going to be nearly irresistible. Resist it. Trust me.
1. IMMEDIATELY retain an attorney.
Get a partner from a larger, NATIONAL firm. Don't let them pawn off junior partners or associates on you. They might try, all law firms might, but insist instead that your lead be a partner who has been with the firm for awhile. Do NOT use your local attorney. Yes, I mean your long-standing family attorney who did your mother's will. Do not use the guy who fought your dry-cleaner bill. Do not use the guy you have trusted your entire life because of his long and faithful service to your family. In fact, do not use any firm that has any connection to family or friends or community. TRUST me. This is bad. You want someone who has never heard of you, any of your friends, or any member of your family. Go the the closest big city and walk into one of the national firms asking for one of the "Trust and Estates" partners you have previously looked up on http://www.martindale.com from one of the largest 50 firms in the United States which has an office near you. You can look up attornies by practice area and firm on Martindale.
2. Decide to take the lump sum.
Most lotteries pay a really pathetic rate for the annuity. It usually hovers around 4.5% annual return or less, depending. It doesn't take much to do better than this, and if you have the money already in cash, rather than leaving it in the hands of the state, you can pull from the capital whenever you like. If you take the annuity you won't have access to that cash. That could be good. It could be bad. It's probably bad unless you have a very addictive personality. If you need an allowance managed by the state, it is because you didn't listen to point #1 above.
Why not let the state just handle it for you and give you your allowance?
Many state lotteries pay you your "allowence" (the annuity option) by buying U.S. treasury instruments and running the interest payments through their bureaucracy before sending it to you along with a hunk of the principal every month. You will not be beating inflation by much, if at all. There is no reason you couldn't do this yourself, if a low single-digit return is acceptable to you.
You aren't going to get even remotely the amount of the actual jackpot. Take our old friend Mr. Whittaker. Using Whittaker is a good model both because of the reminder of his ignominious decline, and the fact that his winning ticket was one of the larger ones on record. If his situation looks less than stellar to you, you might have a better perspective on how "large" your winnings aren't. Whittaker's "jackpot" was $315 million. He selected the lump-sum cash up-front option, which knocked off $145 million (or 46% of the total) leaving him with $170 million. That was then subject to withholding for taxes of $56 million (33%) leaving him with $114 million.
In general, you should expect to get about half of the original jackpot if you elect a lump sum (maybe better, it depends). After that, you should expect to lose around 33% of your already pruned figure to state and federal taxes. (Your mileage may vary, particularly if you live in a state with aggressive taxation schemes).
3. Decide right now, how much you plan to give to family and friends.
This really shouldn't be more than 20% or so. Figure it out right now. Pick your number. Tell your lawyer. That's it. Don't change it. 20% of $114 million is $22.8 million. That leaves you with $91.2 million. DO NOT CONSULT WITH FAMILY when deciding how much to give to family. You are going to get advice that is badly tainted by conflict of interest, and if other family members find out that Aunt Flo was consulted and they weren't you will never hear the end of it. Neither will Aunt Flo. This might later form the basis for an allegation that Aunt Flo unduly influenced you and a lawsuit might magically appear on this basis. No, I'm not kidding. I know of one circumstance (related to a business windfall, not a lottery) where the plaintiffs WON this case.
Do NOT give anyone cash. Ever. Period. Just don't. Do not buy them houses. Do not buy them cars. Tell your attorney that you want to provide for your family, and that you want to set up a series of trusts for them that will total 20% of your after tax winnings. Tell him you want the trust empowered to fund higher education, some help (not a total) purchase of their first home, some provision for weddings and the like, whatever. Do NOT put yourself in the position of handing out cash. Once you do, if you stop, you will be accused of being a heartless bastard (or bitch). Trust me. It won't go well.
It will be easy to lose perspective. It is now the duty of your friends, family, relatives, hangers-on and their inner circle to skew your perspective, and they take this job quite seriously. Setting up a trust, a managed fund for your family that is in the double digit millions is AMAZINGLY generous. You need never have trouble sleeping because you didn't lend Uncle Jerry $20,000 in small denomination unmarked bills to start his chain of deep-fried peanut butter pancake restaurants. ("Deep'n 'nutter Restaurants") Your attorney will have a number of good ideas how to parse this wealth out without turning your siblings/spouse/children/grandchildren/cousins/waitresses into the latest Paris Hilton.
4. You will be encouraged to hire an investment manager. Considerable pressure will be applied. Don't.
Investment managers charge fees, usually a percentage of assets. Consider this: If they charge 1% (which is low, I doubt you could find this deal, actually) they have to beat the market by 1% every year just to break even with a general market index fund. It is not worth it, and you don't need the extra return or the extra risk. Go for the index fund instead if you must invest in stocks. This is a hard rule to follow. They will come recommended by friends. They will come recommended by family. They will be your second cousin on your mother's side. Investment managers will sound smart. They will have lots of cool acronyms. They will have nice PowerPoint presentations. They might (MIGHT) pay for your shrimp cocktail lunch at TGI Friday's while reminding you how poor their side of the family is. They live for this stuff.
You should smile, thank them for their time, and then tell them you will get back to them next week. Don't sign ANYTHING. Don't write it on a cocktail napkin (lottery lawsuit cases have been won and lost over drunkenly scrawled cocktail napkin addition and subtraction figures with lots of zeros on them). Never call them back. Trust me. You will thank me later. This tactic, smiling, thanking people for their time, and promising to get back to people, is going to have to become familiar. You will have to learn to say no gently, without saying the word "no." It sounds underhanded. Sneaky. It is. And its part of your new survival strategy. I mean the word "survival" quite literally.
Get all this figured out BEFORE you claim your winnings. They aren't going anywhere. Just relax.
5. If you elect to be more global about your paranoia, use between 20.00% and 33.00% of what you have not decided to commit to a family fund IMMEDIATELY to purchase a combination of longer term U.S. treasuries (5 or 10 year are a good idea) and perhaps even another G7 treasury instrument. This is your safety net. You will be protected... from yourself.
You are going to be really tempted to starting being a big investor. You are going to be convinced that you can double your money in Vegas with your awesome Roulette system/by funding your friend's amazing idea to sell Lemming dung/buying land for oil drilling/by shorting the North Pole Ice market (global warming, you know). This all sounds tempting because "Even if I lose it all I still have $XX million left! Anyone could live on that comfortably for the rest of their life." Yeah, except for 33% of everyone who won the lottery.
You're not going to double your money, so cool it. Let me say that again. You're not going to double your money, so cool it. Right now, you'll get around 3.5% on the 10 year U.S. treasury. With $18.2 million (20% of $91.2 mil after your absurdly generous family gift) invested in those you will pull down $638,400 per year. If everything else blows up, you still have that, and you will be in the top 1% of income in the United States. So how about you not fuck with it. Eh? And that's income that is damn safe. If we get to the point where the United States defaults on those instruments, we are in far worse shape than worrying about money.
If you are really paranoid, you might consider picking another G7 or otherwise mainstream country other than the U.S. according to where you want to live if the United States dissolves into anarchy or Britney Spears is elected to the United States Senate. Put some fraction in something like Swiss Government Bonds at 3%. If the Swiss stop paying on their government debt, well, then you know money really means nothing anywhere on the globe anymore. I'd study small field sustainable agriculture if you think this is a possibility. You might have to start feedng yourself.
6. That leaves, say, 80% of $91.2 million or $72.9 million.
Here is where things start to get less clear. Personally, I think you should dump half of this, or $36.4 million, into a boring S&P 500 index fund. Find something with low fees. You are going to be constantly tempted to retain "sophisticated" advisers who charge "nominal fees." Don't. Period. Even if you lose every other dime, you have $638,400 per year you didn't have before that will keep coming in until the United States falls into chaos. Fuck advisers and their fees. Instead, drop your $36.4 million in the market in a low fee vehicle. Unless we have an unprecedented downturn the likes of which the United States has never seen, should return around 7.00% or so over the next 10 years. You should expect to touch not even a dime of this money for 10 or 15 or even 20 years. In 20 years $36.4 million could easily become $115 million.
7. So you have put a safety net in place.
You have provided for your family beyond your wildest dreams. And you still have $36.4 million in "cash." You know you will be getting $638,400 per year unless the capital building is burning, you don't ever need to give anyone you care about cash, since they are provided for generously and responsibly (and can't blow it in Vegas) and you have a HUGE nest egg that is growing at market rates. (Given the recent dip, you'll be buying in at great prices for the market). What now? Whatever you want. Go ahead and burn through $36.4 million in hookers and blow if you want. You've got more security than 99% of the country. A lot of it is in trusts so even if you are sued your family will live well, and progress across generations. If your lawyer is worth his salt (I bet he is) then you will be insulated from most lawsuits anyhow. Buy a nice house or two, make sure they aren't stupid investments though. Go ahead and be an angel investor and fund some startups, but REFUSE to do it for anyone you know. (Friends and money, oil and water - Michael Corleone) Play. Have fun. You earned it by putting together the shoe sizes of your whole family on one ticket and winning the jackpot.
submitted by DamnDam to PromptsJustforMe [link] [comments]


2020.09.16 16:08 Nestledrink GeForce RTX 3080 Review Megathread

GeForce RTX 3080 Review Megathread

GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition reviews are up.

Image Link - GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition

Reminder: Do NOT buy from 3rd Party Marketplace Seller on Ebay/Amazon/Newegg (unless you want to pay more). Assume all the 3rd party sellers are scalping. If it's not being sold by the actual retailer (e.g. Amazon selling on Amazon.com or Newegg selling on Newegg.com) then you should treat the product as sold out and wait.

Below is the compilation of all the reviews that have been posted so far. I will be updating this continuously throughout the day with the conclusion of each publications and any new review links. This will be sorted alphabetically.

Written Articles

Anandtech - No Anandtech review today. Will be added next week

Arstechnica

Instead, I'm confident in saying that the $699 RTX 3080 has handily dethroned the GTX 1080 Ti as the market's best expensive-but-attainable GPU. Its specific performance profile, achieved with serious hunger (320W) and a large-but-not-epic pool of RAM (10GB, albeit in the efficient GDDR6X profile), will let you rip and tear in 4K resolutions and in high-performing VR scenarios without requiring buy-in from game developers to toggle Nvidia's proprietary systems.
Simultaneously, this card's advances on the ray-tracing front make that realm's "medium" settings a no-brainer in applicable software, even without having to toggle Nvidia's DLSS upscaling system. So far, we haven't seen any software take advantage of Nvidia's newly advertised "RTX I/O" system, which is meant to more efficiently funnel 3D assets through the GPU without wasting CPU cycles. It's a proprietary Nvidia tech, limited only to its newest GPUs, so I'm not holding my breath expecting RTX I/O to make industry-wide waves in the immediate future.
But much of that proprietary "RTX" stuff from Turing, particularly ray tracing, will soon become an industry-wide standard, thanks to factors like the upcoming Windows 10 standard of DirectX 12 Ultimate and AMD's own aggressive entry into ray tracing (fueled in part by both major next-gen consoles this holiday season). What I once called the "RTX lottery ticket" is now a given, and the RTX 3080 is proof that you can have your 60fps-at-4K cake and eat your ray traced frosting, too.
Verdict: If you're itching to build a desktop PC in the $1,500-and-up range, you can finally expect proper bang for your $699 GPU buck. Buy.

Babeltechreviews

We are impressed with the Founders Edition of the RTX 3080 which has exceptional performance at Ultra 4K and at 2560×1440. For now, it stands alone as the fastest video card in the world and it has launched at $699 – the same price the RTX 2080 SUPER FE launched at, and $100 less expensive than the RTX 2080 at launch – and much less expensive compared to the $1199 RTX 2080 Ti FE which launched two years ago.
The Founders Edition of the RTX 3080 is well-built, solid, and good-looking, and it stays cool and quiet even when overclocked. The only nitpicks we have are that the shipping/display box is almost impossible to open after the card is removed, and that the 12-pin adapter cable is bulky and it looks out of place on such a great-looking card. Fortunately, EVGA has stepped up with a much less bulky cable that will aid meticulous builders for cable management.
If you currently game on an GTX 1080 Ti, you will do yourself a big favor by upgrading to a RTX 3080. For the same launch price, the RTX 3080 will give much better visuals for ray tracing, much higher overall performance, and DLSS 2.0 will allow for better performance for the games that use it. The RTX 3080 is a true 4K/60 FPS video card for most modern games. It well deserves BabelTechReviews Editor’s Choice Award.

Digital Foundry Article

Digital Foundry Video

The RTX 3080 is an important product. For two years now, the pinnacle of PC graphics technology has been defined by the Turing-based RTX 2080 Ti. It's fast, very fast. It's so fast in fact, that there's a strong argument that any resolutions below ultra HD or high resolution ultrawide won't see the GPU horsepower fully utilised on anything other than the fastest gaming CPU. And yet the RTX 3080 takes everything to the next level - you're looking at an average range of 65 to 80 per cent more performance up against 2080, and around 24 to 37 per cent more grunt than 2080 Ti. With ray tracing factored into the equation, the boosts can be even more significant.
And in a world where the console manufacturers have been bashful about telling us how much the next generation is actually going to cost, Nvidia coming straight out of the gate with $699/£650 pricing for a product so powerful is a massive statement - and delivering an upcoming RTX 3070 with 2080 Ti-level performance at Series X money may also give many pause: should they buy a new console or upgrade the PC they may already own?
There's a lot more to the RTX offering we've not looked at in this review either - the firm's commitment to streamers and broadcasting with bespoke tools is significant. We use the RTX voice tool all of the time to provide cleaner voiceovers in our video work, but it's clear that Nvidia is looking to push its AI hardware to deliver much more functionality both inside and outside of gaming. Software is often a value-added extra we don't consider, but there's a lot of interesting work happening here. My only criticism? Extra features are very, very welcome but the Nvidia GPU control panel is well past its sell-by date and really needs a fresh lick of paint and a ginormous speed-up.
It's unlikely that paying a bit more for electricity is likely to worry the kind of user willing to spend so much on a graphics card - and the 220W TDP for the upcoming RTX 3070 suggests that Nvidia knows that, throwing everything it possibly can at the more premium 3080 and 3090 where the kind of user likely to buy in at this level won't mind the 'performance at all costs' approach to the products. Certainly, I really enjoy using this card - I like using RTX 2080 Ti for 4K gaming and the RTX 3080 doesn't feel like an iterative upgrade. I can do more with it, I can feel the difference. Side-by-side with RTX 2080, it's almost a night and day improvement in many regards. But with that said, I still think the 20-series cards have much to offer: they don't become obsolete overnight, they're still strong performers and they have the complete next-gen feature set. And I suspect the real audience for this card lies elsewhere: there's still a lot of folks out there with a 10-series Pascal cards and as the graphs across these pages demonstrate, those products are starting to show their age - and in that respect, the new Ampere line looks like a highly compelling upgrade.

Guru3D

We feel it is safe to say that it's been worth the wait. Ampere as an architecture is nothing short of impressive. Combined with hyper-fast GDDR6X memory and a radical new cooling design, a new trend is set, as this product is seriously competing with the board partner cards. I mean, all registers are green, including rendering performance, cooling, and acoustic performance as well as the simple yet so crucial aesthetic feel. I do worry a little about the open fin structure versus dust. Next to that, you are going to yearn for a dedicated 12-pin power connector leading from the PSU and there is some coil whine going on. Of course, overall power consumption has increased really significantly. How important these things are to you, is for you to decide. The flipside of the coin is that you'll receive a product that will be dominant in that Ultra HD space. Your games average out anywhere from 60 to 100+ FPS, well, aside from Flight Simulator 2020 :)
Dropping down in resolutions does create other challenges; you'll be far less GPU bound, but then again, we do not expect you to purchase a GeForce RTX and play games at 1920x1080. Arbitrarily speaking, starting at a monitor resolution of 2560x1440, that's the domain where the GeForce RTX 3080 will start to shine. The raw Shading/rasterizer (read: regular rendered games) performance is staggering as this many Shader cores make a difference. The new generational architecture tweaks for ray-tracing and Tensor also is significant. Coming from the RTX 2080, the RTX 3080 exhibited a roughly 85% performance increase and that is going to bring Hybrid Ray-tracing tow higher resolutions. DX-R will remain to be massively demanding, of course, but when you can play Battlefield V in ultra HD with ray-tracing and DLSS enabled at over 70 FPS, well hey, I'm cool with that. Also, CUDA compute performance in Blender and V-Ray, OMG! The asking price for all this render performance is $699 USD, and that is the biggest GPU bottleneck for most people, especially with the upcoming consoles in the vicinity. However, there always has been a significant distinction between PC and console games; I suspect that will not be any different this time around. We bow to the Ampere architecture as it is impressive as, for those willing to spend the money on it, it's wholeheartedly recommended and eas an easy top pick.

Hexus

Nvidia latest Ampere architecture arrives in consumer graphics card space as the GeForce RTX 30-series GPUs. Initially comprised the RTX 3070, RTX 3080 and RTX 3090, debuting at different times over the course of the next month, they are primed to set new benchmark standards at the premium end of the market.
The largest, most powerful Ampere die is known as GA102, and it goes much bigger on floating-point cores yet ironically reduces the relative amount of silicon devoted to RT and Tensor cores when they've been firmly in the marketing headlights since being amalgamated into last-gen Turing two years ago.
Floating-point muscle is supported by oodles of bandwidth and general efficiencies across the chip. GA102 is a veritable monster with capability of pushing close to 40 TFLOPS of compute performance in unbridled form, clearly hinting at its datacentre provenance, from which Nvidia moulds gaming graphics.
GeForce RTX 3080 takes GA102 as its performance base but retains approximately 85 percent of its throughput potential through the use of 68 out of a possible 84 SMs. The backend, meanwhile, sacrifices width and a modicum of speed compared to a full-fat layout, but be in no doubt, RTX 3080 is a supremely fast card in its own right.
Fast enough, actually, to smash the last-gen GeForce RTX 2080 Super with which, for now, it shares a $699/£649 price tag. It's typically over 50 percent speedier, rising to 80 percent in a best-case scenario, and there's enough silicon artillery to roundly defeat the $1,199 RTX 2080 Ti in every game. RTX 3080 heralds a step-change in performance at the $699 price point.
More pragmatically, RTX 3080 delivers on the promise of 4K gaming at a fluid 60fps and, equally important for Nvidia's ambitions, for the first time, the ability to render at the same level with raytracing and DLSS turned on. That's a big deal.
The new GPU's frequency/voltage sweetspot occurs at a higher wattage than we're accustomed to in the consumer space, most likely resulting from using 8nm Samsung instead of 7nm TSMC. 320W requires a new FE cooler - and pretty it is - and again speaks to the high-performance datacentre characteristics baked into Ampere. The wattage isn't a problem for any premium gaming PC, of course, but it's worth knowing that availing oneself of excellent performance requires extra wick. Even so, RTX 3080 tops the bang4buck and energy efficiency charts.
There is plenty to like here. GeForce RTX 3080 represents true 4K60 max-your-settings gameplay at an unexpectedly low $699. It's hard to argue against performance or value, so we won't. All that's left to say is that if you want the fastest GPU money can currently buy, at least for the next week, GeForce RTX 3080 provides it with alarmingly good value.

Hot Hardware

Summarizing the new GeForce RTX 3080's performance is as simple as could be -- it is the fastest GPU we have tested to date, across the board, period. Regardless of the game, application, or benchmark we used, the GeForce RTX 3080 put up the best scores of the bunch, often more than doubling the performance of AMD's current flagship Radeon RX 5700 XT. Despite its much lower introductory price, the GeForce RTX 3080 even skunked the Titan RTX and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti by relatively large margins. The bottom line is, NVIDIA's got an absolutely stellar-performing GPU on its hands, and the GeForce RTX 3080 isn't even the best Ampere has to offer -- the upcoming GeForce RTX 3090 is bigger and burlier across the board.
We have been hearing rumblings of Ampere's monster performance for months. Even before CES, a couple of board partners hinted that NVIDIA had lofty goals for Ampere and the company has delivered in spades. The GeForce RTX 3080 is a beast. We suspect peak power consumption is going to be a concern for some users, but in practice, for us at least, it is a non-issue. Thanks to the newly engineered cooling solution, the GeForce RTX 3080 runs cool and quiet in real-world conditions. Sure, your rig might put out a bit more heat, but we suspect most users aren't going to care with a GPU that performs as well as the RTX 3080 does.
Of course, we have yet to see what the GeForce RTX 3090 can do and AMD has announced that is RDNA2-based Radeon RX 6000 series will be unveiled in a few weeks. Looking back through our numbers, "Big Navi" will have to offer more than 2X the performance of a Radeon RX 5700 XT to be in the same class as the GeForce RTX 3080. Could AMD do it? Sure, it's possible. But based on the company's somewhat conservative decisions of the last few generations, we don't think its targets are quite that aggressive. We'll know for sure soon enough though.
Today, the spotlight shines on NVIDIA. The GeForce RTX 3080 is nothing short of impressive. At its expected $700-ish price point (depending on the model), there is nothing that can come even close to touching it. The new NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is an easy Editor's Choice. If you're buying a new GPU in its price range, there is no other choice currently.

Igor's Lab

It should not be an advertising sales event, but a test that is as objective and fair as possible, even if the results are still so solid that you have to fight a bit with the “want to have” factor in the gaming sector. Especially at higher resolutions, this card is a real board, because even if the lead over the GeForce RTX 2080 Super doesn’t always turn out to be in high double digits, it’s always enough to virtually reach the next quality level in playability. Right stop of many quality controllers included. Particularly if the games of the GeForce RTX 3080 and the new architecture lie, are also sometimes up to 80% increase compared to the RTX 2080 super in it and a RTX 2080 Ti is beaten with almost 40%. This too must be noted if one wants to be fair. But it is only the beginning and not generally enforceable with the game engines, unfortunately.
It is also exactly the increase, because you can, for example. has always demanded when playing in Ultra-HD. Here you go, here’s an offer for it. The fact that the RAM with its 10 GB could become scarce from time to time, at the latest in Ultra-HD, is due to the design by NVIDIA and also by many game manufacturers, who fill up with data exactly what can be filled up. Which of course would not be a blanket apology and thus the only point of criticism. It should have been doubled by now, price point or no price point.

KitGuru Article

KitGuru Video

There’s no two ways about it. Nvidia’s RTX 3080 is a stunning return to form for the manufacturer, delivering hugely impressive gen-on-gen gains compared to the RTX 20-series that debuted two years ago. The 3080 is the fastest graphics card we have ever tested (though the RTX 3090 will have something to say about that next week), and it is delivered at almost half the price of last generation’s flagship, the RTX 2080 Ti.
The most disappointing aspect of the RTX 20-series was its marginal improvements in terms of traditional raster performance. Ray tracing aside, unless you were willing to pay the big bucks for the 2080 Ti, we didn’t get any GPUs that delivered a big generational jump in performance. It seems Nvidia took that disappointment as a challenge; with the RTX 3080, Nvidia has delivered a huge jump forward.
That’s because, on average, the RTX 3080 improves on the RTX 2080 by 68% at 4K resolution, while it’s also 31% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti and 58% faster than the 2080 Super. Anyone who held onto a GTX 1080 Ti will also see performance increases to the tune of 90%, again at 4K. Across the aisle, AMD is now in real need of Big Navi to deliver the goods when it arrives on October 28, as the 3080 crushes the Radeon VII by 86% and it’s over twice as fast as the RX 5700 XT, again at 4K.
The margins of victory for the RTX 3080 do change as we step down in resolution – it’s 31% faster than a 2080 Ti at 4K, 25% faster at 1440p and 18% faster at 1080p. The latter resolution proved a significant problem on a number of occasions due to CPU bottlenecks. Even with an i9-10900K running at 5.1GHz, the CPU was holding the 3080 back by a significant margin in at least 5 of the 11 titles we tested today. Even where the bottlenecks weren’t as significant, relative gains versus the 2080 Ti were lower at 1080p than 1440p or 4K, in every single game we tested. Gamers looking to buy this GPU will certainly get the most out of it at 4K, though a 55% increase in performance over the RTX 2080 at 1440p shows high refresh rate WQHD users will also get their money’s worth.
However you slice it, RTX 3080 is a huge step forward from Turing. Of course, it is easy to be cynical and point out the fact that Turing hardly improved on Pascal in terms of traditional raster performance at this price point, and that does make Ampere look more attractive than it should. There may be an element of truth there, but even the gains versus Pascal look impressive considering the GTX 1080 Ti came out three and a half years ago. The 3080 is 90% faster on average at 4K, but over 120% faster in certain titles like Control and The Division 2.
It’s also good to see RTX performance taking a significant stride forward. The improvements to the RT cores and overall architecture mean relative performance with RT on scales slightly better than with it off – gains of around 35-40% compared to the 2080 Ti were typical in our testing. Of course, enabling the technology still results in a significant hit to performance, but as 3080 has pushed things so far forward, the end result isn’t nearly as bad as it was with Turing. In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, for instance, we saw average frame rates hitting nearly 90FPS at 1440p with RTX set to Ultra, while Metro Exodus was averaging over 110FPS at the same resolution, again with RTX set to Ultra.

OC3D

The performance of Nvidia's RTX 3080 is unquestionably impressive. Even making allowances for the fact that a few of our games get a bit grumpy about both ray tracing and DLSS in various combinations, preferring an everything on or everything off approach (it is true for pre-DLSS 2.0 titles). Another factor that's worth considering is that Nvidia's current pre-release drivers are missing some elements that allow us to overclock things properly. Regardless, the amount of performance available from the card in a simple plug-and-go form is so great that anyone who has recently purchased any of the RTX 2xxx cards will be left green with envy.
We all knew that the RTX 2080 set were supremely good, but they were always stupidly expensive. Here you have a card which is, right now, the fastest card on the planet and yet is so affordable that you could grab a 2TB M.2 NVMe drive and still save on the price of an RTX 2080 Ti. Or, if you're running an X570 system like we are, it is enough of a saving that if you'd budgeted for a Ryzen 3 3300X and RTX 2080 Ti setup you could upgrade that CPU to a Ryzen 9 3950X without needing to spend any extra money. That's bananas.
DLSS is massively impressive too. Just cast your eye across our DLSS off and DLSS on results, it's clear that you can gain massive FPS boosts yet without compromising image quality. If like us, you're old enough to remember the early days of 3D games, you'll know that lowering your game resolution is the easiest way to improve FPS, but turning everything blurry in the process. DLSS 2.0 gives you higher frame rates and higher image quality. It's witchcraft.
Thus, as we said at the start, the RTX 3080 FE is RTX 2080 Ti besting performance for the price of an RTX 2080 Super, and why you haven't already left to buy one, we don't know. You owe it to yourself. If the graphics card is outside of your price range, we know for a fact that cheaper Ampere cards are on the horizon.

PC Perspective

NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition is the fastest graphics card I’ve ever tested, and it’s an amazing product for the money. Now, actually buying one for $699 might require devine intervention, but we don’t really know until they go on sale.
We know demand will be there because performance is just so damn impressive with this card. No, the leap in performance isn’t 2x over the RTX 2080 outside of certain testing scenarios, but it’s always significant – often 60% or greater. The RTX 2080 was soundly beaten in these benchmarks.
I’ll be honest here. The RTX 2080 was a letdown. The Turing launch left a lot of gaming frustrated, and Pascal continued to be the architecture of choice for most GeForce gamers. RTX made for an awesome demo, but outside of a few titles that was about it. DLSS took time to improve, and without it full native rendering with real-time ray tracing was too expensive from a performance standpoint.
I feel like the ray tracing story has changed, if the RTX 3080 is any indication. Suddenly I’m really interested in games that use more RTX features, and excited about the prospect of the RTX 3090’s performance in this department. Frame rates – even without DLSS – are suddenly playable even at very high settings, and the visuals in some of the games and demos are stunning.
With the RTX 3080 we finally have a graphics card that redefines the $699 performance level in a way that eclipses even the GTX 1080 Ti. It’s an exciting time to be an enthusiast, and I can’t wait to get my hands on the RTX 3070 – and (fingers crossed) the RTX 3090 as well.

PC World

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said that Ampere is GeForce’s greatest generational leap ever, and he wasn’t kidding. Remember being blown away when the GTX 1080 was 60 to 70 percent faster than the GTX 980, even with its slightly higher price? The GeForce RTX 3080 spits out frames up to 80 percent faster in several games, and 60 percent higher in the others. It’s roughly 30 percent faster than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, the $1,200 previous-gen flagship, and a ridonkulous 100 to 160 percent faster than the older GeForce GTX 1080. All at the exact same $700 price tag as the RTX 2080.
The promises were true. This thing is an absolute monster. Sometimes it’s faster at 4K than the RTX 2080 is at 1440p. Ludicrous.
There are no games where the GeForce RTX 3080 fails to clear a 60-frames-per-second average at 4K resolution with all possible visuals effects turned on. The exception is the ridiculously strenuous Total War: Troy, which averages 56 fps (and feels just fine at even lower speeds as a strategy game). Most games go significantly faster than that. Other than Troy, again, no games fall below 100 fps at 1440p resolution with everything maxed out. Again, Total War again falls just shy, at 98 fps, and again, most games go significantly faster than that. If you’re fine bumping graphics down to high, games fly along even faster in our off-the-cuff tests. No graphics card has come close to this level of performance before.
The “worst” (but still massive) results come in CPU-bound or older DX11 titles. The Ampere architecture screams when unleashed on properly optimized games that were built for DirectX 12 or Vulkan. More and more of those are being published these days, and all ray-traced games require DX12. The impact of ray tracing and DLSS doesn’t appear to be lessened despite the next-gen RT and tensor cores, but the RTX 3080 is so fast, it doesn’t matter. You can play ray traced games at 1440p, and even 4K now.

TechGage

As we saw across most of these results, the performance gains seen with the new generation Ampere GeForces is simply incredible. There’s no other way to say it. The strong performance seen because of the RT cores makes AMD’s next move an important one. We’ve already known for ages that the new consoles all use ray tracing, and those are of course built with AMD Radeon GPUs. How that will all carry over to the desktop, we’re not sure, but we will gain a better understanding in late October when AMD makes its RDNA2 “Big Navi” announcement.
Even in the most modest of cases, the RTX 3080 outperformed the last-gen TITAN RTX by around 10%, and that’s not even the comparison card we should be choosing. That wouldn’t even be the 2080 Ti, which NVIDIA has said the RTX 3080 would easily beat out. The best comparison would be the 2080 SUPER, which also cost $699 ahead of this launch. Compared to that card, the RTX 3080 simply slays. We do not see gains like these come around to GPUs all too often.
As mentioned before, the only limitation we can think of with this card on the creator side is the 10GB frame buffer, but we don’t see that being a common complaint anytime soon. For those with the biggest needs, the 24GB frame buffer on the RTX 3090 should solve your quandary. Hopefully NVIDIA has other SKUs planned that will help fill that 10GB~24GB void (of course it does).
While this article took care of the ProViz aspect of the new GeForce RTX 3080, a forthcoming article will take an in-depth look at gaming, which will include a number of new RTX-infused titles. Stay tuned.

Techpowerup

Averaged over our whole benchmarking suite, at 4K resolution, the GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition is 66% faster than the RTX 2080 that it replaces (both launched at $699). NVIDIA's new card even beats last generation's flagship the RTX 2080 Ti, by a whopping 31%! AMD's Radeon RX 5700 XT is half as fast as the RTX 3080. Yup, 3080 is +100% 5700 XT performance—AMD better get things right with RDNA2. If you've held out on a GTX 1080 Ti until now, congrats, now is the right time to upgrade. RTX 3080 Ti will double your FPS, and give you all the latest techs and features like raytracing and DLSS.
When looking at lower resolutions, the lead of the RTX 3080 shrinks considerably, +51% over RTX 2080 at 1440p, +35% at 1080p. The reason is that with so much GPU horsepower, games are becoming increasingly CPU limited. A posterchild for that is Anno 1800—at lower resolution all cards are bunched up against an invisible performance wall, around 68 FPS in this case, that's the CPU limit. We're already on a very fast CPU, Ryzen won't run any faster either. We've tested this extensively in our RTX 3080: 10900K vs 3900XT review that just went up, too. Back to Anno 1800, 1080p is totally CPU limited on all high-end cards, after switching to 1440p, most comparison cards fall back in FPS, because their GPU isn't fast enough, so they become GPU limited. The only exception are RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 3080, which both achieve 67 FPS at 1440p—still CPU limited. When switching to 4K, RTX 2080 Ti falls back to 46 FPS, RTX 3080 still seems quite CPU limited at 63 FPS. While unfortunate, CPU limits are a reality of gaming—RTX 3080 will not magically give you 360 FPS in all games—no graphics card can. CPU power, game engines and developers have to catch up with the new performance first.
GeForce RTX 3080 is perfect for 4K gaming. It's able to exceed 60 FPS in nearly all titles, the only exception in our test suite is Control, which runs at 48 FPS. NVIDIA does have one ace up their sleeve: DLSS, which renders the game at lower resolution and upscales the frame to your native monitor resolution. While traditional upscaling comes with blurriness and artifacts, NVIDIA DLSS uses AI to improve the scaling. The algorithm has improved over the years, but the basic concept remains. Machine learning is used to train a model to excel at upscaling of game content. While only few games support DLSS at this time, the numbers are growing quickly.
NVIDIA has always been criticized for high pricing in the past, it seems they listened to feedback. The RTX 3080 Founders Edition retails at $699, which an extremely competitive price. Remember, RTX 3080 is twice as fast as RX 5700 XT ($370), 31% faster than RTX 2080 Ti ($1000+). It seems that NVIDIA is concerned mostly with the new consoles, which will bring high-fidelity gaming to the masses at prices around $500. Charging $1000 for a graphics card will be tough sell for many, when they can have a whole gaming console for $500. At the RTX 3080's price point there really is no alternative, maybe a used RTX 2080 Ti at bargain prices? Not sure, definitely nothing that AMD offers at this time. We are working on several reviews of RTX 3080 custom-designs from board partners, the reviews will be up very soon. It will be interesting to see if their cards will be able to match or exceed the RTX 3080 Founders Edition. NVIDIA set the bar very high.

The FPS Review

Compared to the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 1440p the GeForce RTX 3080 FE averages an increase in performance of 20% over the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE. The Far Cry 5 and FS 2020 numbers bring that average down a lot, if we remove those two then the average is 24%. At 4K the GeForce RTX 3080 FE averages 25% faster than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE video card was a $1200 video card, now for $500 less at $699 you can have performance that is 20-25% faster than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE, for less money. That is advancement, again, all without including Ray Tracing or DLSS into the mix, pure rasterization.
Point being? Rasterization Performance improvement is there on the GeForce RTX 3080 FE, the facts speak the truth.
As you can see, with Ray Tracing Enabled the performance advantages with GeForce RTX 3080 FE are even higher than without Ray Tracing. The average performance increase at 1440p compared to the RTX 2080 FE is 77%. The average performance increase at 4K compared to the RTX 2080 FE is 84%. The GeForce RTX 3080 FE has a very large leap over the GeForce RTX 2080 FE with Ray Tracing turned on. Compared to the RTX 2080 Ti FE the RTX 3080 FE at 1440p averages 33% faster and at 4K it is 32% faster. This proves that Ray Tracing performance is vastly improved.
At the end of the day, the NVIDIA Ampere architecture is superior to last generation’s Pascal architecture. The node has improved from the last generation, and the architecture is now keyed more specifically to floating-point performance, Ray Tracing performance, and machine learning/AI performance via Tensor Cores. The architecture also supports some interesting new technologies we are looking forward to such as RTX I/O. It has future bandwidth support in mind with PCI-Express 4.0.
Rasterization, Ray Tracing, and Machine Learning are all aspects of modern-day GPUs, and they all matter moving forward for gaming. In traditional gaming (rasterized performance) the GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition gives us a big upgrade in performance compared to the GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition it is replacing. We see benefits depend on the game, with some as high as 80+% and most averaging around 50-60% advantage, depending on the resolution. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3080 FE also provides 20-25% faster performance than the previous fastest video card, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. When you apply Ray Tracing, the advantages in performance grow even more. Apply DLSS on top of that and Ray Tracing is playable in games at 4K now, and most definitely 1440p.
At $699 the GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition video card offers gamers a lot of gaming performance and features that will improve the gameplay experience. At the end of the day the gameplay experience is most important, and the GeForce RTX 3080 FE has the ability to transform that gameplay experience with features like Ray Tracing and DLSS. With the performance it brings, those features are playable. It also offers the fastest performance around, and even provides better performance than the fastest video card of the last generation. Whether you play games without Ray Tracing and DLSS, or you play games with, this video card will provide the best gameplay experience.

Tomshardware

The GeForce RTX 3080 is here, right now, and priced pretty reasonably considering the performance it offers. Last month, you could have spent $2,500 on dual RTX 2080 Ti cards hooked up via NVLink, only to find that multi-GPU support in games is largely dead, particularly in new releases. Now, for $700, you get 30% better performance than the outgoing RTX 2080 Ti and pocket $500 in savings. That's assuming you can find an RTX 3080 in stock.
Let's also be clear that the RTX 3080 is primarily for high-resolution gaming. Yes, you can run 1440p with RTX effects, and it will be a good fit. It's a better fit for 4K gaming. Don't bother with it if you're using a 1080p display, as you could get nearly the same level of performance with a lesser GPU. Which brings us to the next option: Wait for the RTX 3070 or RX 6800 XT (whatever AMD's $400-$500 option ends up being called).
The RTX 3070 should still be plenty fast for 1440p gaming, and more than fast enough for 1080p — just like the RTX 2080 Ti. Nvidia says it will perform "better than the 2080 Ti," though we take that marketing-speak with a scoop of salt. Out of all the benchmarks we ran, there was only one (Doom Eternal) where the 3080 actually doubled the 2080's performance.
Anyway, saving $200 and buying a 3070 could make a lot of sense. It's interesting to note that the RTX 3070 is a substantial step down from the RTX 3080, however. The 3080 has 48% more GPU, RT, and Tensor cores, it has 20% more memory, and the memory is clocked 36% higher. That's a big enough gap that we could see an RTX 3070 Ti down the road, but at what price? Alternatively, wait and see what AMD's Navi 2x / RX 6000 GPUs can do, which we'll hear about more on October 28.
The bottom line is that the RTX 3080 is the new high-end gaming champion, delivering truly next-gen performance without a massive increase in price. If you've been sitting on a GTX 1080 Ti or lower, waiting for a good time to upgrade, that time has arrived. The only remaining question is just how competitive AMD's RX 6000, aka Big Navi, will be. Even with 80 CUs, on paper, it looks like Nvidia's RTX 3080 may trump the top Navi 2x cards, thanks to GDDR6X and the doubling down on FP32 capability. AMD might offer 16GB of memory, but it's probably going to be paired with a 256-bit bus and clocked quite a bit lower than 19 Gbps, which may limit performance.

Computerbase - German

HardwareLuxx - German

PCGH - German

Video Review

Bitwit

Digital Foundry Video

Gamers Nexus Video

Hardware Canucks

JayzTwoCents

Linus Tech Tips

Optimum Tech - TBD

Paul's Hardware

Tech of Tomorrow - TBD

Tech Yes City

submitted by Nestledrink to nvidia [link] [comments]


2020.09.16 04:49 RobotRedfish AVCT: The Girl Next Door of Cloud Computing

AVCT is basically Velma from Scooby Doo. She's no Daphne but she's the smart choice and you like orange sweaters.
What is AVCT: American Virtual Cloud Technologies. In their own words, “AVCtechnologies makes comprehensive and innovative cloud-based UCaaS (United Communications as a Service), Cybersecurity, and IT solutions simple for over 900 enterprise customers, including 350+ managed service clients.” Their mission is to be the best single destination partner for the white-glove delivery of reliable and secure managed cloud services, hardware, and software.
What makes AVCT special?
• Their executive team includes former executives from AT&T, Panasonic, NSORO, Vonage, MasTech, Compass, and Motorola
• As of 2019, AVCT now owns Computex, the Houston metropolitan area's top cloud and managed services provider and the top cybersecurity player. They have been around for the past 30 years and have grown their reputation steadily while boasting a customer retention rate of over 90%.
• Computex has its own multimillion dollar (NOC) network operations centers in Houston and Minneapolis along with a security operations center (SOC) in Houston, a solutions lab for testing complex technology solutions, and three integration centers.
• They have focused their efforts on capturing the work from home movement. AVCT offers their clients a private cloud. This enables a company’s employees to access sensitive work-specific programs and data from home while offering easy interpersonal communication on a platform built with cybersecurity in mind.
• As of 8/5/2020 AVCT has acquired the Kandy platform as well as its accompanying team from Ribbon Communications. In their own words, “Kandy is a cloud-based, real-time communications platform offering proprietary UCaaS, CPaaS, and CCaaS capabilities. Kandy enables service providers, enterprises, software vendors, systems integrators, partners and developers to enrich their applications and services with real-time contextual communications, providing a more engaging user experience. With Kandy, companies of all sizes and types can quickly embed real-time communications capabilities into their existing applications and business processes.
Why is now a good entry point to invest in AVCT long term?
In early 2019, a blank check company named Pensare was on the hunt for established cloud companies with significant room to grow. In July 2019 the acquisition of a 30 year old cloud service company named Computex DID happen but it wasn’t finalized until April 2020. At the time Computex was bought for 65 million but in a recent job posting they described themselves as a “150 million+ cloud UCaaS and cybersecurity company.” So as of July 2019, Pensare became AVCT, the owner of Computex. On 8/5/2020, AVCT shared that they will be acquiring Kandy along with its team. This led to a temporary hype which drove the roughly 4 dollar stock price to over 11. However, the stock price plummeted on 8/14/2020 when many who had high hopes for AVCT’s first meaningful earnings date were disappointed when AVCT showed lackluster earnings. AVCT is now trading lower than it was before the Kandy news was released, which I have a hard time making sense of.
The Bull Case: This could be an opportunity to get in early on a company with a proven executive team that wants to capitalize on the work from home movement. The executive team has stated publicly that aggressive expansion and acquisition of cloud computing companies will be intrinsic to their vision of becoming the best partner for the white-glove delivery of reliable and secure managed cloud services, hardware, and software. The recent Kandy acquisition is a testament to that.
The Bear Case: The recent 10Q (Quarterly Report) on 8/14/2020 was disappointing to say the least. As of June 30, AVCT only boasted 101 million in total assets and total liabilities of 88 million with 46 million of that being current liabilities. This means AVCT will be fighting the headwinds of substantial debt and share dilution.
Conclusion: If you are interested, I encourage you to look at the following links to get a better idea of the current state of the company as well as the competency of the executive team. Please due your own due diligence. I have also included the link to the last earnings report. Personally, I see AVCT as a company with all the ingredients to explode upwards in the next few years. I don’t think it’d be a great candidate for day trading but since I am bullish on it long term, I have been accumulating shares twice a month since its share price was at 2.25 and warrants were .22. I have absolutely no plans to sell and I will be steadily accumulating even more warrants before the next earnings report in November.
How can I Invest? AVCT share price is currently trading at 3.96 and warrants are trading at .28 (can be exercised at 11.50 with expiration in 2025). I am investing aggressively in warrants but I advise caution to others who might be thinking of doing the same since AVCT has not officially submitted the document to the SEC needed to register the shares for the warrants.
TLDR: AVCT has the makings of a cloud computing/UCaaS company with a great future ahead of it. They want to be the at the helm of the work from home transition. It has a proven executive team and now might be a good time to accumulate for the long term since many investors (including myself) were hoping for more from it too quickly last quarter.
LINKS
Last 10-Q Form: https://dd7pmep5szm19.cloudfront.net/2444/0001213900-20-022051.htm
AVCT About Us Page: https://www.ir.avctechnologies.com/
Good Article with Executive’s Describing their Vision: : https://www.crn.com/news/channel-programs/computex-looks-to-grow-acquire-during-covid-19-crisis?itc=refresh
Press Release for Kandy acquisition: https://www.ir.avctechnologies.com/news-releases/avctechnologies-announces-agreement-to-buy-ribbons-kandy-communications-business/
submitted by RobotRedfish to RobinHoodPennyStocks [link] [comments]


2020.09.16 04:44 RobotRedfish AVCT: The Girl Next Door of Cloud Computing

AVCT is basically Velma from Scooby Doo. She's no Daphne but she's the smart choice and you like orange sweaters.
Disclaimer: This post is similar to my last post about AVCT but with a brief summary of current updates. I know many of you have kept up to date with this one, so if you see any mistakes, please let me know.
What is AVCT: American Virtual Cloud Technologies. In their own words, “AVCtechnologies makes comprehensive and innovative cloud-based UCaaS (United Communications as a Service), Cybersecurity, and IT solutions simple for over 900 enterprise customers, including 350+ managed service clients.” Their mission is to be the best single destination partner for the white-glove delivery of reliable and secure managed cloud services, hardware, and software.
What makes AVCT special?
• Their executive team includes former executives from AT&T, Panasonic, NSORO, Vonage, MasTech, Compass, and Motorola
• As of 2019, AVCT now owns Computex, the Houston metropolitan area's top cloud and managed services provider and the top cybersecurity player. They have been around for the past 30 years and have grown their reputation steadily while boasting a customer retention rate of over 90%.
• Computex has its own multimillion dollar (NOC) network operations centers in Houston and Minneapolis along with a security operations center (SOC) in Houston, a solutions lab for testing complex technology solutions, and three integration centers.
• They have focused their efforts on capturing the work from home movement. AVCT offers their clients a private cloud. This enables a company’s employees to access sensitive work-specific programs and data from home while offering easy interpersonal communication on a platform built with cybersecurity in mind.
• As of 8/5/2020 AVCT has acquired the Kandy platform as well as its accompanying team from Ribbon Communications. In their own words, “Kandy is a cloud-based, real-time communications platform offering proprietary UCaaS, CPaaS, and CCaaS capabilities. Kandy enables service providers, enterprises, software vendors, systems integrators, partners and developers to enrich their applications and services with real-time contextual communications, providing a more engaging user experience. With Kandy, companies of all sizes and types can quickly embed real-time communications capabilities into their existing applications and business processes.
Why is now a good entry point to invest in AVCT long term?
In early 2019, a blank check company named Pensare was on the hunt for established cloud companies with significant room to grow. In July 2019 the acquisition of a 30 year old cloud service company named Computex DID happen but it wasn’t finalized until April 2020. At the time Computex was bought for 65 million but in a recent job posting they described themselves as a “150 million+ cloud UCaaS and cybersecurity company.” So as of July 2019, Pensare became AVCT, the owner of Computex. On 8/5/2020, AVCT shared that they will be acquiring Kandy along with its team. This led to a temporary hype which drove the roughly 4 dollar stock price to over 11. However, the stock price plummeted on 8/14/2020 when many who had high hopes for AVCT’s first meaningful earnings date were disappointed when AVCT showed lackluster earnings. AVCT is now trading lower than it was before the Kandy news was released, which I have a hard time making sense of.
The Bull Case: This could be an opportunity to get in early on a company with a proven executive team that wants to capitalize on the work from home movement. The executive team has stated publicly that aggressive expansion and acquisition of cloud computing companies will be intrinsic to their vision of becoming the best partner for the white-glove delivery of reliable and secure managed cloud services, hardware, and software. The recent Kandy acquisition is a testament to that.
The Bear Case: The recent 10Q (Quarterly Report) on 8/14/2020 was disappointing to say the least. As of June 30, AVCT only boasted 101 million in total assets and total liabilities of 88 million with 46 million of that being current liabilities. This means AVCT will be fighting the headwinds of substantial debt and share dilution.
Conclusion: If you are interested, I encourage you to look at the following links to get a better idea of the current state of the company as well as the competency of the executive team. Please due your own due diligence. I have also included the link to the last earnings report. Personally, I see AVCT as a company with all the ingredients to explode upwards in the next few years. I don’t think it’d be a great candidate for day trading but since I am bullish on it long term, I have been accumulating shares twice a month since its share price was at 2.25 and warrants were .22. I have absolutely no plans to sell and I will be steadily accumulating even more warrants before the next earnings report in November.
How can I Invest? AVCT share price is currently trading at 3.96 and warrants are trading at .28 (can be exercised at 11.50 with expiration in 2025). I am investing aggressively in warrants but I advise caution to others who might be thinking of doing the same since AVCT has not officially submitted the document to the SEC needed to register the shares for the warrants.
Good luck my brothers
TLDR: AVCT has the makings of a cloud computing/UCaaS company with a great future ahead of it. They want to be the at the helm of the work from home transition. It has a proven executive team and now might be a good time to accumulate for the long term since many investors (including myself) were hoping for more from it too quickly last quarter.
LINKS
Last 10-Q Form: https://dd7pmep5szm19.cloudfront.net/2444/0001213900-20-022051.htm
AVCT About Us Page: https://www.ir.avctechnologies.com/
Good Article with Executive’s Describing their Vision: : https://www.crn.com/news/channel-programs/computex-looks-to-grow-acquire-during-covid-19-crisis?itc=refresh
Press Release for Kandy acquisition: https://www.ir.avctechnologies.com/news-releases/avctechnologies-announces-agreement-to-buy-ribbons-kandy-communications-business/
submitted by RobotRedfish to SPACs [link] [comments]


Descendants 2 Real Age and Life Partners 2018 - YouTube How to Log in to Net Partner 0 10 Solo Volleyball Drills To Try At Home - YouTube Big Sean - Single Again (Extended Version) - YouTube Best place to find a weekend fwb or partner in Singapore ... 3.1.4 Draw and label a diagram showing the structure of ... Being Single Is Not Your Fault  Dating Advice for Singles My Pretty Husband. Wife Accepts Crossdressing Transgender ... MacGyver ... and their real life partners - YouTube h&r Single Shot Detailed Reassembly (part 1) - YouTube

JICS Single Sign-On

  1. Descendants 2 Real Age and Life Partners 2018 - YouTube
  2. How to Log in to Net Partner 0
  3. 10 Solo Volleyball Drills To Try At Home - YouTube
  4. Big Sean - Single Again (Extended Version) - YouTube
  5. Best place to find a weekend fwb or partner in Singapore ...
  6. 3.1.4 Draw and label a diagram showing the structure of ...
  7. Being Single Is Not Your Fault Dating Advice for Singles
  8. My Pretty Husband. Wife Accepts Crossdressing Transgender ...
  9. MacGyver ... and their real life partners - YouTube
  10. h&r Single Shot Detailed Reassembly (part 1) - YouTube

Descendants 2 cast Real Age and Life Partners In this video I will show you the actors of the disney channel movie: Descendants 2, I will show you their age ... 10 at-home volleyball drills you can do with just a ball and a wall! Don't let being stuck at home stop you from getting your volleyball training in! ☆ SUBSC... Water (H2O) should be drawn as two hydrogen atoms connected to one oxygen atom by a bond known as a polar covalent bond. There are two lone pairs of electron... What happens when a wife discovers her husband crossdresses?Have you been caught crossdressing? Please let us know. Film from http://tranisa.com . http://cro... Learn how to Log in to your Net Partner Account. If you have any questions contact the Emmanuel College Financial Aid department at (706) 245-2844. A brand new pickup guide on easy dating and finding a weekend fwb/partner on this small sunny Island. This guide will introduce you to the hunting ground tha... https://BigSean.lnk.to/SingleAgain Watch Official Video Here: https://BigSean.lnk.to/SingleAgainVid https://www.instagram.com/bigsean/ https://twitter.com/Bi... Who is Lucas Till Dating? Who is Lucas Till's girlfriend? Who is Lucas Till's wife? Is Lucas Till single? Who is Lucas Till married to? Who is Richard Dean A... Why I’m single, relationship advice for women, relationship advice for men, I'm comfortable Being Single, The Added Benefits of The D.I.V.A. University Journey, relationship advice, # ... DO AT YOUR OWN RISK. This is a job gunsmiths only do not attempt. I do not take any responsibility for your mistakes.